Association of surgical specialty and processes of care with patient outcomes for carotid endarterectomy

Edward L. Hannan, A. John Popp, Paul Feustel, Ethan Halm, Gary Bernardini, John Waldman, Dhiraj Shah, Mark R. Chassin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

90 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose - Because there is considerable variation in practice patterns and outcomes for carotid endarterectomy (CE), there is a need to study the processes of care that are associated with adverse outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of processes of care and surgical specialty on adverse outcomes for CE. Methods - A retrospective cohort study based on a voluntary CE registry containing 3644 patients undergoing CE between April 1, 1997, and March 31, 1999, in New York hospitals was used in the study. A multivariable statistical model was used to identify significant independent patient risk factors and to examine the association of processes of care and surgical specialty with outcomes after adjustment for differences in patient risk factors. Results - The overall adverse outcome (in-hospital death or stroke) rate was 1.84%. After adjustment for differences in 7 patient risk factors that were significantly related to adverse outcomes, the use of ≥ 1 specific processes of care (eversion endarterectomy, protamine, or shunts) was found to be associated with lower odds of an adverse outcome relative to patients undergoing CE without the processes (OR=0.42, P=0.006). Similarly, patients undergoing surgery performed by vascular surgeons had lower odds of experiencing an adverse outcome (OR=0.36, P=0.009). Processes of care and surgical specialty were highly correlated with one another. Conclusions - Processes of care and surgical specialty are significant interrelated determinants of adverse outcome for CE.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2890-2897
Number of pages8
JournalStroke
Volume32
Issue number12
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Surgical Specialties
Carotid Endarterectomy
Patient Care
Endarterectomy
Protamines
Statistical Models
Blood Vessels
Registries
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Stroke

Keywords

  • Carotid endarterectomy
  • Surgical treatment
  • Treatment outcome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Hannan, E. L., Popp, A. J., Feustel, P., Halm, E., Bernardini, G., Waldman, J., ... Chassin, M. R. (2001). Association of surgical specialty and processes of care with patient outcomes for carotid endarterectomy. Stroke, 32(12), 2890-2897.

Association of surgical specialty and processes of care with patient outcomes for carotid endarterectomy. / Hannan, Edward L.; Popp, A. John; Feustel, Paul; Halm, Ethan; Bernardini, Gary; Waldman, John; Shah, Dhiraj; Chassin, Mark R.

In: Stroke, Vol. 32, No. 12, 2001, p. 2890-2897.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hannan, EL, Popp, AJ, Feustel, P, Halm, E, Bernardini, G, Waldman, J, Shah, D & Chassin, MR 2001, 'Association of surgical specialty and processes of care with patient outcomes for carotid endarterectomy', Stroke, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 2890-2897.
Hannan EL, Popp AJ, Feustel P, Halm E, Bernardini G, Waldman J et al. Association of surgical specialty and processes of care with patient outcomes for carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 2001;32(12):2890-2897.
Hannan, Edward L. ; Popp, A. John ; Feustel, Paul ; Halm, Ethan ; Bernardini, Gary ; Waldman, John ; Shah, Dhiraj ; Chassin, Mark R. / Association of surgical specialty and processes of care with patient outcomes for carotid endarterectomy. In: Stroke. 2001 ; Vol. 32, No. 12. pp. 2890-2897.
@article{f5e1c93a88f641d8a893fb4e27fa8307,
title = "Association of surgical specialty and processes of care with patient outcomes for carotid endarterectomy",
abstract = "Background and Purpose - Because there is considerable variation in practice patterns and outcomes for carotid endarterectomy (CE), there is a need to study the processes of care that are associated with adverse outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of processes of care and surgical specialty on adverse outcomes for CE. Methods - A retrospective cohort study based on a voluntary CE registry containing 3644 patients undergoing CE between April 1, 1997, and March 31, 1999, in New York hospitals was used in the study. A multivariable statistical model was used to identify significant independent patient risk factors and to examine the association of processes of care and surgical specialty with outcomes after adjustment for differences in patient risk factors. Results - The overall adverse outcome (in-hospital death or stroke) rate was 1.84{\%}. After adjustment for differences in 7 patient risk factors that were significantly related to adverse outcomes, the use of ≥ 1 specific processes of care (eversion endarterectomy, protamine, or shunts) was found to be associated with lower odds of an adverse outcome relative to patients undergoing CE without the processes (OR=0.42, P=0.006). Similarly, patients undergoing surgery performed by vascular surgeons had lower odds of experiencing an adverse outcome (OR=0.36, P=0.009). Processes of care and surgical specialty were highly correlated with one another. Conclusions - Processes of care and surgical specialty are significant interrelated determinants of adverse outcome for CE.",
keywords = "Carotid endarterectomy, Surgical treatment, Treatment outcome",
author = "Hannan, {Edward L.} and Popp, {A. John} and Paul Feustel and Ethan Halm and Gary Bernardini and John Waldman and Dhiraj Shah and Chassin, {Mark R.}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "2890--2897",
journal = "Stroke",
issn = "0039-2499",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association of surgical specialty and processes of care with patient outcomes for carotid endarterectomy

AU - Hannan, Edward L.

AU - Popp, A. John

AU - Feustel, Paul

AU - Halm, Ethan

AU - Bernardini, Gary

AU - Waldman, John

AU - Shah, Dhiraj

AU - Chassin, Mark R.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Background and Purpose - Because there is considerable variation in practice patterns and outcomes for carotid endarterectomy (CE), there is a need to study the processes of care that are associated with adverse outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of processes of care and surgical specialty on adverse outcomes for CE. Methods - A retrospective cohort study based on a voluntary CE registry containing 3644 patients undergoing CE between April 1, 1997, and March 31, 1999, in New York hospitals was used in the study. A multivariable statistical model was used to identify significant independent patient risk factors and to examine the association of processes of care and surgical specialty with outcomes after adjustment for differences in patient risk factors. Results - The overall adverse outcome (in-hospital death or stroke) rate was 1.84%. After adjustment for differences in 7 patient risk factors that were significantly related to adverse outcomes, the use of ≥ 1 specific processes of care (eversion endarterectomy, protamine, or shunts) was found to be associated with lower odds of an adverse outcome relative to patients undergoing CE without the processes (OR=0.42, P=0.006). Similarly, patients undergoing surgery performed by vascular surgeons had lower odds of experiencing an adverse outcome (OR=0.36, P=0.009). Processes of care and surgical specialty were highly correlated with one another. Conclusions - Processes of care and surgical specialty are significant interrelated determinants of adverse outcome for CE.

AB - Background and Purpose - Because there is considerable variation in practice patterns and outcomes for carotid endarterectomy (CE), there is a need to study the processes of care that are associated with adverse outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of processes of care and surgical specialty on adverse outcomes for CE. Methods - A retrospective cohort study based on a voluntary CE registry containing 3644 patients undergoing CE between April 1, 1997, and March 31, 1999, in New York hospitals was used in the study. A multivariable statistical model was used to identify significant independent patient risk factors and to examine the association of processes of care and surgical specialty with outcomes after adjustment for differences in patient risk factors. Results - The overall adverse outcome (in-hospital death or stroke) rate was 1.84%. After adjustment for differences in 7 patient risk factors that were significantly related to adverse outcomes, the use of ≥ 1 specific processes of care (eversion endarterectomy, protamine, or shunts) was found to be associated with lower odds of an adverse outcome relative to patients undergoing CE without the processes (OR=0.42, P=0.006). Similarly, patients undergoing surgery performed by vascular surgeons had lower odds of experiencing an adverse outcome (OR=0.36, P=0.009). Processes of care and surgical specialty were highly correlated with one another. Conclusions - Processes of care and surgical specialty are significant interrelated determinants of adverse outcome for CE.

KW - Carotid endarterectomy

KW - Surgical treatment

KW - Treatment outcome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035214920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035214920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11739992

AN - SCOPUS:0035214920

VL - 32

SP - 2890

EP - 2897

JO - Stroke

JF - Stroke

SN - 0039-2499

IS - 12

ER -