Asymmetric bias in user guided segmentations of brain structures

Martin Styner, Rachel G. Smith, Michael M. Graves, Matthew W. Mosconi, Sarah Peterson, Scott White, Joe Blocher, Mohammed El-Sayed, Heather C. Hazlett

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Brain morphometric studies often incorporate comparative asymmetry analyses of left and right hemispheric brain structures. In this work we show evidence that common methods of user guided structural segmentation exhibit strong left-right asymmetric biases and thus fundamentally influence any left-right asymmetry analyses. We studied several structural segmentation methods with varying degree of user interaction from pure manual outlining to nearly fully automatic procedures. The methods were applied to MR images and their corresponding left-right mirrored images from an adult and a pediatric study. Several expert raters performed the segmentations of all structures. The asymmetric segmentation bias is assessed by comparing the left-right volumetric asymmetry in the original and mirrored dataseis, as well as by testing each sides volumetric differences to a zero mean standard t-tests. The structural segmentations of caudate, putamen, globus pallidus, amygdala and hippocampus showed a highly significant asymmetric bias using methods with considerable manual outlining or landmark placement. Only the lateral ventricle segmentation revealed no asymmetric bias due to the high degree of automation and a high intensity contrast on its boundary. Our segmentation methods have been adapted in that they are applied to only one of the hemispheres in an image and its left-right mirrored image. Our work suggests that existing studies of hemispheric asymmetry without similar precautions should be interpreted in a new, skeptical light. Evidence of an asymmetric segmentation bias is novel and unknown to the imaging community. This result seems less surprising to the visual perception community and its likely cause is differences in perception of oppositely curved 3D structures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProgress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE
Volume6512
EditionPART 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007
EventMedical Imaging 2007: Image Processing - San Diego, CA, United States
Duration: Feb 18 2007Feb 20 2007

Other

OtherMedical Imaging 2007: Image Processing
CountryUnited States
CitySan Diego, CA
Period2/18/072/20/07

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Styner, M., Smith, R. G., Graves, M. M., Mosconi, M. W., Peterson, S., White, S., ... Hazlett, H. C. (2007). Asymmetric bias in user guided segmentations of brain structures. In Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE (PART 1 ed., Vol. 6512). [65120K] https://doi.org/10.1117/12.709049