At What Levels Are Freehand Pedicle Screws More Frequently Malpositioned in Children?

Mark Heidenreich, Yaser M K Baghdadi, Amy L. McIntosh, William J. Shaughnessy, Mark B. Dekutoski, Anthony Stans, A. Noelle Larson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective case series. Background: Previous studies report that 5% to 17% of pedicle screws placed in children are malpositioned. Knowledge of the long-term effects of malpositioned screws is limited. We sought to further characterize risk factors for malpositioned pedicle screws in order to establish a more proactive role in limiting future complications. Objective: We undertook this study to answer the following: 1) Is the rate of freehand pedicle screw malpositioning higher in children with spinal deformity, particularly at the apical concavity? 2) At what vertebral levels do freehand pedicle screws have the highest rates of malpositioning? 3) In which direction (medial or lateral) do freehand pedicle wall violations occur most often? Methods: Incidental postoperative computed tomographic (CT) exams were retrospectively reviewed in 85 pediatric patients (605 screws) treated with posterior spinal fusion using freehand pedicle screw technique. Of the screws imaged, 355 were in patients without deformity and 250 in patients with deformity. Breaches were categorized as mild (<2 mm), moderate (2-4 mm), or severe (>4 mm). Results: Screws in pediatric deformity patients were more frequently malpositioned by 2 mm or more than were screws in patients without deformity (26% vs. 19%, p =.02). In patients with deformity, no higher rate of screw malposition was detected at the apical region. Overall, the highest rates of severe screw malposition were between T3 and T8. Pedicle breaches were more commonly in a medial direction compared with lateral (74% vs. 26%, p <.0001). However, severe breaches within the T3-T8 region were more often directed lateral than medial (92% vs. 8%, p ≤.0001). Conclusions: The clinical significance of asymptomatic pedicle screw breaches in children has not yet been determined. In this study, screws at the apical concavity were no more likely to be malpositioned than those at other sites. Efforts to reduce pedicle screw malposition would likely be most effective at the T3-T8 levels. Level of Evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of the levels of evidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)332-337
Number of pages6
JournalSpine Deformity
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

Pediatrics
Spinal Fusion
Pedicle Screws
Retrospective Studies
Guidelines
Direction compound
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Malposition
  • Pediatric
  • Pedicle screws

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Heidenreich, M., Baghdadi, Y. M. K., McIntosh, A. L., Shaughnessy, W. J., Dekutoski, M. B., Stans, A., & Larson, A. N. (2015). At What Levels Are Freehand Pedicle Screws More Frequently Malpositioned in Children? Spine Deformity, 3(4), 332-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2014.12.003

At What Levels Are Freehand Pedicle Screws More Frequently Malpositioned in Children? / Heidenreich, Mark; Baghdadi, Yaser M K; McIntosh, Amy L.; Shaughnessy, William J.; Dekutoski, Mark B.; Stans, Anthony; Larson, A. Noelle.

In: Spine Deformity, Vol. 3, No. 4, 01.07.2015, p. 332-337.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Heidenreich, M, Baghdadi, YMK, McIntosh, AL, Shaughnessy, WJ, Dekutoski, MB, Stans, A & Larson, AN 2015, 'At What Levels Are Freehand Pedicle Screws More Frequently Malpositioned in Children?', Spine Deformity, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 332-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2014.12.003
Heidenreich, Mark ; Baghdadi, Yaser M K ; McIntosh, Amy L. ; Shaughnessy, William J. ; Dekutoski, Mark B. ; Stans, Anthony ; Larson, A. Noelle. / At What Levels Are Freehand Pedicle Screws More Frequently Malpositioned in Children?. In: Spine Deformity. 2015 ; Vol. 3, No. 4. pp. 332-337.
@article{a5ca4cce471c4a29ad5cb960da941f80,
title = "At What Levels Are Freehand Pedicle Screws More Frequently Malpositioned in Children?",
abstract = "Study Design: Retrospective case series. Background: Previous studies report that 5{\%} to 17{\%} of pedicle screws placed in children are malpositioned. Knowledge of the long-term effects of malpositioned screws is limited. We sought to further characterize risk factors for malpositioned pedicle screws in order to establish a more proactive role in limiting future complications. Objective: We undertook this study to answer the following: 1) Is the rate of freehand pedicle screw malpositioning higher in children with spinal deformity, particularly at the apical concavity? 2) At what vertebral levels do freehand pedicle screws have the highest rates of malpositioning? 3) In which direction (medial or lateral) do freehand pedicle wall violations occur most often? Methods: Incidental postoperative computed tomographic (CT) exams were retrospectively reviewed in 85 pediatric patients (605 screws) treated with posterior spinal fusion using freehand pedicle screw technique. Of the screws imaged, 355 were in patients without deformity and 250 in patients with deformity. Breaches were categorized as mild (<2 mm), moderate (2-4 mm), or severe (>4 mm). Results: Screws in pediatric deformity patients were more frequently malpositioned by 2 mm or more than were screws in patients without deformity (26{\%} vs. 19{\%}, p =.02). In patients with deformity, no higher rate of screw malposition was detected at the apical region. Overall, the highest rates of severe screw malposition were between T3 and T8. Pedicle breaches were more commonly in a medial direction compared with lateral (74{\%} vs. 26{\%}, p <.0001). However, severe breaches within the T3-T8 region were more often directed lateral than medial (92{\%} vs. 8{\%}, p ≤.0001). Conclusions: The clinical significance of asymptomatic pedicle screw breaches in children has not yet been determined. In this study, screws at the apical concavity were no more likely to be malpositioned than those at other sites. Efforts to reduce pedicle screw malposition would likely be most effective at the T3-T8 levels. Level of Evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of the levels of evidence.",
keywords = "Malposition, Pediatric, Pedicle screws",
author = "Mark Heidenreich and Baghdadi, {Yaser M K} and McIntosh, {Amy L.} and Shaughnessy, {William J.} and Dekutoski, {Mark B.} and Anthony Stans and Larson, {A. Noelle}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jspd.2014.12.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "332--337",
journal = "Spine Deformity",
issn = "2212-134X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - At What Levels Are Freehand Pedicle Screws More Frequently Malpositioned in Children?

AU - Heidenreich, Mark

AU - Baghdadi, Yaser M K

AU - McIntosh, Amy L.

AU - Shaughnessy, William J.

AU - Dekutoski, Mark B.

AU - Stans, Anthony

AU - Larson, A. Noelle

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Study Design: Retrospective case series. Background: Previous studies report that 5% to 17% of pedicle screws placed in children are malpositioned. Knowledge of the long-term effects of malpositioned screws is limited. We sought to further characterize risk factors for malpositioned pedicle screws in order to establish a more proactive role in limiting future complications. Objective: We undertook this study to answer the following: 1) Is the rate of freehand pedicle screw malpositioning higher in children with spinal deformity, particularly at the apical concavity? 2) At what vertebral levels do freehand pedicle screws have the highest rates of malpositioning? 3) In which direction (medial or lateral) do freehand pedicle wall violations occur most often? Methods: Incidental postoperative computed tomographic (CT) exams were retrospectively reviewed in 85 pediatric patients (605 screws) treated with posterior spinal fusion using freehand pedicle screw technique. Of the screws imaged, 355 were in patients without deformity and 250 in patients with deformity. Breaches were categorized as mild (<2 mm), moderate (2-4 mm), or severe (>4 mm). Results: Screws in pediatric deformity patients were more frequently malpositioned by 2 mm or more than were screws in patients without deformity (26% vs. 19%, p =.02). In patients with deformity, no higher rate of screw malposition was detected at the apical region. Overall, the highest rates of severe screw malposition were between T3 and T8. Pedicle breaches were more commonly in a medial direction compared with lateral (74% vs. 26%, p <.0001). However, severe breaches within the T3-T8 region were more often directed lateral than medial (92% vs. 8%, p ≤.0001). Conclusions: The clinical significance of asymptomatic pedicle screw breaches in children has not yet been determined. In this study, screws at the apical concavity were no more likely to be malpositioned than those at other sites. Efforts to reduce pedicle screw malposition would likely be most effective at the T3-T8 levels. Level of Evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of the levels of evidence.

AB - Study Design: Retrospective case series. Background: Previous studies report that 5% to 17% of pedicle screws placed in children are malpositioned. Knowledge of the long-term effects of malpositioned screws is limited. We sought to further characterize risk factors for malpositioned pedicle screws in order to establish a more proactive role in limiting future complications. Objective: We undertook this study to answer the following: 1) Is the rate of freehand pedicle screw malpositioning higher in children with spinal deformity, particularly at the apical concavity? 2) At what vertebral levels do freehand pedicle screws have the highest rates of malpositioning? 3) In which direction (medial or lateral) do freehand pedicle wall violations occur most often? Methods: Incidental postoperative computed tomographic (CT) exams were retrospectively reviewed in 85 pediatric patients (605 screws) treated with posterior spinal fusion using freehand pedicle screw technique. Of the screws imaged, 355 were in patients without deformity and 250 in patients with deformity. Breaches were categorized as mild (<2 mm), moderate (2-4 mm), or severe (>4 mm). Results: Screws in pediatric deformity patients were more frequently malpositioned by 2 mm or more than were screws in patients without deformity (26% vs. 19%, p =.02). In patients with deformity, no higher rate of screw malposition was detected at the apical region. Overall, the highest rates of severe screw malposition were between T3 and T8. Pedicle breaches were more commonly in a medial direction compared with lateral (74% vs. 26%, p <.0001). However, severe breaches within the T3-T8 region were more often directed lateral than medial (92% vs. 8%, p ≤.0001). Conclusions: The clinical significance of asymptomatic pedicle screw breaches in children has not yet been determined. In this study, screws at the apical concavity were no more likely to be malpositioned than those at other sites. Efforts to reduce pedicle screw malposition would likely be most effective at the T3-T8 levels. Level of Evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of the levels of evidence.

KW - Malposition

KW - Pediatric

KW - Pedicle screws

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931827617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84931827617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.12.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 27927478

AN - SCOPUS:84931827617

VL - 3

SP - 332

EP - 337

JO - Spine Deformity

JF - Spine Deformity

SN - 2212-134X

IS - 4

ER -