Away rotations and matching in integrated plastic surgery residency: Applicant and program director perspectives

Brian C. Drolet, Jonathan P. Brower, Scott D. Lifchez, Jeffrey E. Janis, Paul Y. Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Although nearly all medical students pursuing integrated plastic surgery residency participate in elective rotations away from their home medical school, the value and costs of these "away" rotations have not been well studied. Methods: The authors surveyed all integrated plastic surgery program directors and all applicants in the 2015 National Residency Matching Program. Results: Forty-two program directors and 149 applicants (64 percent and 70 percent response rate, respectively) completed the survey. Applicants reported 13.7 weeks spent on plastic surgery rotations during medical school, including a mean of 9.2 weeks on away rotations. Average reported cost for away rotations was $3591 per applicant. Both applicants and program directors most commonly reported "making a good impression" (44.6 percent and 36.6 percent, respectively) or finding a "good-fit" program (27.7 percent and 48.8 percent, respectively) as the primary goal for away rotations. Almost all applicants (91.1 percent) believed an away rotation made them more competitive for matching to a program at which they rotated. Program directors ranked a strong away rotation performance as the most important residency selection criterion. Twenty-seven percent of postgraduate year-1 positions were filled by an away rotatorm and an additional 17 percent were filled by a home medical student. Conclusions: Away rotations appear to be mutually beneficial for applicants and programs in helping to establish a good fit between students and training programs through an extended interaction with the students, residents, and faculty. In addition, making a good impression on a senior elective rotation (home or away) may improve an applicant's chance of matching to a residency program.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1337-1343
Number of pages7
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume137
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Plastic Surgery
Internship and Residency
Medical Schools
Medical Students
Students
Costs and Cost Analysis
Patient Selection
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Away rotations and matching in integrated plastic surgery residency : Applicant and program director perspectives. / Drolet, Brian C.; Brower, Jonathan P.; Lifchez, Scott D.; Janis, Jeffrey E.; Liu, Paul Y.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 137, No. 4, 2016, p. 1337-1343.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Drolet, Brian C. ; Brower, Jonathan P. ; Lifchez, Scott D. ; Janis, Jeffrey E. ; Liu, Paul Y. / Away rotations and matching in integrated plastic surgery residency : Applicant and program director perspectives. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 137, No. 4. pp. 1337-1343.
@article{f670c702f5eb4ecb86864ec83be1a973,
title = "Away rotations and matching in integrated plastic surgery residency: Applicant and program director perspectives",
abstract = "Background: Although nearly all medical students pursuing integrated plastic surgery residency participate in elective rotations away from their home medical school, the value and costs of these {"}away{"} rotations have not been well studied. Methods: The authors surveyed all integrated plastic surgery program directors and all applicants in the 2015 National Residency Matching Program. Results: Forty-two program directors and 149 applicants (64 percent and 70 percent response rate, respectively) completed the survey. Applicants reported 13.7 weeks spent on plastic surgery rotations during medical school, including a mean of 9.2 weeks on away rotations. Average reported cost for away rotations was $3591 per applicant. Both applicants and program directors most commonly reported {"}making a good impression{"} (44.6 percent and 36.6 percent, respectively) or finding a {"}good-fit{"} program (27.7 percent and 48.8 percent, respectively) as the primary goal for away rotations. Almost all applicants (91.1 percent) believed an away rotation made them more competitive for matching to a program at which they rotated. Program directors ranked a strong away rotation performance as the most important residency selection criterion. Twenty-seven percent of postgraduate year-1 positions were filled by an away rotatorm and an additional 17 percent were filled by a home medical student. Conclusions: Away rotations appear to be mutually beneficial for applicants and programs in helping to establish a good fit between students and training programs through an extended interaction with the students, residents, and faculty. In addition, making a good impression on a senior elective rotation (home or away) may improve an applicant's chance of matching to a residency program.",
author = "Drolet, {Brian C.} and Brower, {Jonathan P.} and Lifchez, {Scott D.} and Janis, {Jeffrey E.} and Liu, {Paul Y.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0000000000002029",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "137",
pages = "1337--1343",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Away rotations and matching in integrated plastic surgery residency

T2 - Applicant and program director perspectives

AU - Drolet, Brian C.

AU - Brower, Jonathan P.

AU - Lifchez, Scott D.

AU - Janis, Jeffrey E.

AU - Liu, Paul Y.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Background: Although nearly all medical students pursuing integrated plastic surgery residency participate in elective rotations away from their home medical school, the value and costs of these "away" rotations have not been well studied. Methods: The authors surveyed all integrated plastic surgery program directors and all applicants in the 2015 National Residency Matching Program. Results: Forty-two program directors and 149 applicants (64 percent and 70 percent response rate, respectively) completed the survey. Applicants reported 13.7 weeks spent on plastic surgery rotations during medical school, including a mean of 9.2 weeks on away rotations. Average reported cost for away rotations was $3591 per applicant. Both applicants and program directors most commonly reported "making a good impression" (44.6 percent and 36.6 percent, respectively) or finding a "good-fit" program (27.7 percent and 48.8 percent, respectively) as the primary goal for away rotations. Almost all applicants (91.1 percent) believed an away rotation made them more competitive for matching to a program at which they rotated. Program directors ranked a strong away rotation performance as the most important residency selection criterion. Twenty-seven percent of postgraduate year-1 positions were filled by an away rotatorm and an additional 17 percent were filled by a home medical student. Conclusions: Away rotations appear to be mutually beneficial for applicants and programs in helping to establish a good fit between students and training programs through an extended interaction with the students, residents, and faculty. In addition, making a good impression on a senior elective rotation (home or away) may improve an applicant's chance of matching to a residency program.

AB - Background: Although nearly all medical students pursuing integrated plastic surgery residency participate in elective rotations away from their home medical school, the value and costs of these "away" rotations have not been well studied. Methods: The authors surveyed all integrated plastic surgery program directors and all applicants in the 2015 National Residency Matching Program. Results: Forty-two program directors and 149 applicants (64 percent and 70 percent response rate, respectively) completed the survey. Applicants reported 13.7 weeks spent on plastic surgery rotations during medical school, including a mean of 9.2 weeks on away rotations. Average reported cost for away rotations was $3591 per applicant. Both applicants and program directors most commonly reported "making a good impression" (44.6 percent and 36.6 percent, respectively) or finding a "good-fit" program (27.7 percent and 48.8 percent, respectively) as the primary goal for away rotations. Almost all applicants (91.1 percent) believed an away rotation made them more competitive for matching to a program at which they rotated. Program directors ranked a strong away rotation performance as the most important residency selection criterion. Twenty-seven percent of postgraduate year-1 positions were filled by an away rotatorm and an additional 17 percent were filled by a home medical student. Conclusions: Away rotations appear to be mutually beneficial for applicants and programs in helping to establish a good fit between students and training programs through an extended interaction with the students, residents, and faculty. In addition, making a good impression on a senior elective rotation (home or away) may improve an applicant's chance of matching to a residency program.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964057220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964057220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002029

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002029

M3 - Article

C2 - 27018690

AN - SCOPUS:84964057220

VL - 137

SP - 1337

EP - 1343

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 4

ER -