Barriers to cognitive behavioral therapy homework completion scale-depression version

Development and psychometric evaluation

Judith A. Callan, Jacqueline Dunbar-Jacob, Susan M. Sereika, Clement Stone, Amy Fasiczka, Robin B. Jarrett, Michael E. Thase

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We conducted a two-phase study to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of an instrument to identify barriers to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) homework completion in a depressed sample. In Phase I, we developed an item pool by interviewing 20 depressed patients and 20 CBT therapists. In Phase II, we created and administered a draft instrument to 56 people with depression. Exploratory Factor Analysis revealed a two-factor oblique solution of "Patient Factors" and "Therapy/Task Factors." Internal consistency coefficients ranged from .80 to .95. Temporal stability was demonstrated through Pearson correlations of.72 (for the therapist/task subscale) to.95 (for the patient subscale) over periods of time that ranged from 2 days to 3 weeks. The patient subscale was able to satisfactorily classify patients (75% to 79%) with low and high adherence at both sessions. Specificity was.66 at both time points. Sensitivity was.80 at session B and.77 at session C. There were no consistent predictors of assignment compliance when measured by the Assignment Compliance Rating Scale (ACRS; Primakoff, Epstein, & Covi, 1986). The Rating Scale and subscale scores did, however, correlate significantly with assignment noncompliance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-235
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Cognitive Therapy
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Cognitive Therapy
Psychometrics
Depression
Compliance
Statistical Factor Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Barriers to cognitive behavioral therapy homework completion scale-depression version : Development and psychometric evaluation. / Callan, Judith A.; Dunbar-Jacob, Jacqueline; Sereika, Susan M.; Stone, Clement; Fasiczka, Amy; Jarrett, Robin B.; Thase, Michael E.

In: International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2012, p. 219-235.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Callan, Judith A. ; Dunbar-Jacob, Jacqueline ; Sereika, Susan M. ; Stone, Clement ; Fasiczka, Amy ; Jarrett, Robin B. ; Thase, Michael E. / Barriers to cognitive behavioral therapy homework completion scale-depression version : Development and psychometric evaluation. In: International Journal of Cognitive Therapy. 2012 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 219-235.
@article{3c879a12f95643ef84d9db147624d154,
title = "Barriers to cognitive behavioral therapy homework completion scale-depression version: Development and psychometric evaluation",
abstract = "We conducted a two-phase study to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of an instrument to identify barriers to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) homework completion in a depressed sample. In Phase I, we developed an item pool by interviewing 20 depressed patients and 20 CBT therapists. In Phase II, we created and administered a draft instrument to 56 people with depression. Exploratory Factor Analysis revealed a two-factor oblique solution of {"}Patient Factors{"} and {"}Therapy/Task Factors.{"} Internal consistency coefficients ranged from .80 to .95. Temporal stability was demonstrated through Pearson correlations of.72 (for the therapist/task subscale) to.95 (for the patient subscale) over periods of time that ranged from 2 days to 3 weeks. The patient subscale was able to satisfactorily classify patients (75{\%} to 79{\%}) with low and high adherence at both sessions. Specificity was.66 at both time points. Sensitivity was.80 at session B and.77 at session C. There were no consistent predictors of assignment compliance when measured by the Assignment Compliance Rating Scale (ACRS; Primakoff, Epstein, & Covi, 1986). The Rating Scale and subscale scores did, however, correlate significantly with assignment noncompliance.",
author = "Callan, {Judith A.} and Jacqueline Dunbar-Jacob and Sereika, {Susan M.} and Clement Stone and Amy Fasiczka and Jarrett, {Robin B.} and Thase, {Michael E.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1521/ijct.2012.5.2.219",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "219--235",
journal = "International Journal of Cognitive Therapy",
issn = "1937-1209",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers to cognitive behavioral therapy homework completion scale-depression version

T2 - Development and psychometric evaluation

AU - Callan, Judith A.

AU - Dunbar-Jacob, Jacqueline

AU - Sereika, Susan M.

AU - Stone, Clement

AU - Fasiczka, Amy

AU - Jarrett, Robin B.

AU - Thase, Michael E.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - We conducted a two-phase study to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of an instrument to identify barriers to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) homework completion in a depressed sample. In Phase I, we developed an item pool by interviewing 20 depressed patients and 20 CBT therapists. In Phase II, we created and administered a draft instrument to 56 people with depression. Exploratory Factor Analysis revealed a two-factor oblique solution of "Patient Factors" and "Therapy/Task Factors." Internal consistency coefficients ranged from .80 to .95. Temporal stability was demonstrated through Pearson correlations of.72 (for the therapist/task subscale) to.95 (for the patient subscale) over periods of time that ranged from 2 days to 3 weeks. The patient subscale was able to satisfactorily classify patients (75% to 79%) with low and high adherence at both sessions. Specificity was.66 at both time points. Sensitivity was.80 at session B and.77 at session C. There were no consistent predictors of assignment compliance when measured by the Assignment Compliance Rating Scale (ACRS; Primakoff, Epstein, & Covi, 1986). The Rating Scale and subscale scores did, however, correlate significantly with assignment noncompliance.

AB - We conducted a two-phase study to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of an instrument to identify barriers to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) homework completion in a depressed sample. In Phase I, we developed an item pool by interviewing 20 depressed patients and 20 CBT therapists. In Phase II, we created and administered a draft instrument to 56 people with depression. Exploratory Factor Analysis revealed a two-factor oblique solution of "Patient Factors" and "Therapy/Task Factors." Internal consistency coefficients ranged from .80 to .95. Temporal stability was demonstrated through Pearson correlations of.72 (for the therapist/task subscale) to.95 (for the patient subscale) over periods of time that ranged from 2 days to 3 weeks. The patient subscale was able to satisfactorily classify patients (75% to 79%) with low and high adherence at both sessions. Specificity was.66 at both time points. Sensitivity was.80 at session B and.77 at session C. There were no consistent predictors of assignment compliance when measured by the Assignment Compliance Rating Scale (ACRS; Primakoff, Epstein, & Covi, 1986). The Rating Scale and subscale scores did, however, correlate significantly with assignment noncompliance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871461564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871461564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1521/ijct.2012.5.2.219

DO - 10.1521/ijct.2012.5.2.219

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 219

EP - 235

JO - International Journal of Cognitive Therapy

JF - International Journal of Cognitive Therapy

SN - 1937-1209

IS - 2

ER -