Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw instrumentation systems in a corpectomy model

R. B. Ashman, R. D. Galpin, J. D. Corin, C. E. Johnston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

123 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Five different spinal implants, all using pedicle screw attachment to vertebrae, were examined in a one above/one below corpectomy model, to determine 1) the relative stiffness of each construct, 2) the stresses generated in the implant during loading, and 3) the relative fatigue susceptibility of each implant. Results indicated that the relative axial and torsional stiffnesses were similar for all the implants tested (DKS/Zielke, VSP/Steffee, AO Fixator Interne, Luque plate, AO Notched plate). Hence, each of the devices impart approximately the same stability to the spine in this highly unstable model. Stresses measured at the root of the pedicle screws were found to exceed the endurance limit of stainless steel in those systems in which the pedicle screws were attached rigidly to the plates (VSP/Steffee, AO Fixator Interne). Good agreement was found between the measured stresses and stresses derived from static calculations. Comparisons between the stresses from each implant gave a relative measure of fatigue susceptibility that was validated by in vitro cyclic testing. Implants with stresses exceeding the endurance limit failed during the cyclic test.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1398-1405
Number of pages8
JournalSpine
Volume14
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 1989

Fingerprint

Fatigue
Spine
Stainless Steel
Equipment and Supplies
Pedicle Screws
In Vitro Techniques

Keywords

  • biomechanical testing
  • burst fracture
  • pedicle screw
  • spine implants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw instrumentation systems in a corpectomy model. / Ashman, R. B.; Galpin, R. D.; Corin, J. D.; Johnston, C. E.

In: Spine, Vol. 14, No. 12, 1989, p. 1398-1405.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ashman, R. B. ; Galpin, R. D. ; Corin, J. D. ; Johnston, C. E. / Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw instrumentation systems in a corpectomy model. In: Spine. 1989 ; Vol. 14, No. 12. pp. 1398-1405.
@article{be55ce97288c496785ac9dc17d9333e8,
title = "Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw instrumentation systems in a corpectomy model",
abstract = "Five different spinal implants, all using pedicle screw attachment to vertebrae, were examined in a one above/one below corpectomy model, to determine 1) the relative stiffness of each construct, 2) the stresses generated in the implant during loading, and 3) the relative fatigue susceptibility of each implant. Results indicated that the relative axial and torsional stiffnesses were similar for all the implants tested (DKS/Zielke, VSP/Steffee, AO Fixator Interne, Luque plate, AO Notched plate). Hence, each of the devices impart approximately the same stability to the spine in this highly unstable model. Stresses measured at the root of the pedicle screws were found to exceed the endurance limit of stainless steel in those systems in which the pedicle screws were attached rigidly to the plates (VSP/Steffee, AO Fixator Interne). Good agreement was found between the measured stresses and stresses derived from static calculations. Comparisons between the stresses from each implant gave a relative measure of fatigue susceptibility that was validated by in vitro cyclic testing. Implants with stresses exceeding the endurance limit failed during the cyclic test.",
keywords = "biomechanical testing, burst fracture, pedicle screw, spine implants",
author = "Ashman, {R. B.} and Galpin, {R. D.} and Corin, {J. D.} and Johnston, {C. E.}",
year = "1989",
doi = "10.1097/00007632-198912000-00019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "1398--1405",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw instrumentation systems in a corpectomy model

AU - Ashman, R. B.

AU - Galpin, R. D.

AU - Corin, J. D.

AU - Johnston, C. E.

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - Five different spinal implants, all using pedicle screw attachment to vertebrae, were examined in a one above/one below corpectomy model, to determine 1) the relative stiffness of each construct, 2) the stresses generated in the implant during loading, and 3) the relative fatigue susceptibility of each implant. Results indicated that the relative axial and torsional stiffnesses were similar for all the implants tested (DKS/Zielke, VSP/Steffee, AO Fixator Interne, Luque plate, AO Notched plate). Hence, each of the devices impart approximately the same stability to the spine in this highly unstable model. Stresses measured at the root of the pedicle screws were found to exceed the endurance limit of stainless steel in those systems in which the pedicle screws were attached rigidly to the plates (VSP/Steffee, AO Fixator Interne). Good agreement was found between the measured stresses and stresses derived from static calculations. Comparisons between the stresses from each implant gave a relative measure of fatigue susceptibility that was validated by in vitro cyclic testing. Implants with stresses exceeding the endurance limit failed during the cyclic test.

AB - Five different spinal implants, all using pedicle screw attachment to vertebrae, were examined in a one above/one below corpectomy model, to determine 1) the relative stiffness of each construct, 2) the stresses generated in the implant during loading, and 3) the relative fatigue susceptibility of each implant. Results indicated that the relative axial and torsional stiffnesses were similar for all the implants tested (DKS/Zielke, VSP/Steffee, AO Fixator Interne, Luque plate, AO Notched plate). Hence, each of the devices impart approximately the same stability to the spine in this highly unstable model. Stresses measured at the root of the pedicle screws were found to exceed the endurance limit of stainless steel in those systems in which the pedicle screws were attached rigidly to the plates (VSP/Steffee, AO Fixator Interne). Good agreement was found between the measured stresses and stresses derived from static calculations. Comparisons between the stresses from each implant gave a relative measure of fatigue susceptibility that was validated by in vitro cyclic testing. Implants with stresses exceeding the endurance limit failed during the cyclic test.

KW - biomechanical testing

KW - burst fracture

KW - pedicle screw

KW - spine implants

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024816316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024816316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00007632-198912000-00019

DO - 10.1097/00007632-198912000-00019

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 1398

EP - 1405

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 12

ER -