Biopsy site selfies - A quality improvement pilot study to assist with correct surgical site identification

Rajiv I. Nijhawan, Erica H. Lee, Kishwer S. Nehal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND Determining the biopsy site location of a skin cancer before treatment is often challenging. OBJECTIVE To study the implementation and effectiveness of biopsy site selfies as a quality improvement measure for correct surgical site identification. MATERIALS AND METHODS In the first phase, the ability of dermatologic surgeon and patient to definitively identify the biopsy site and whether photography was needed to ensure site agreement were recorded. In the second phase, patients were requested to take biopsy site selfies, and after implementation, similar data were collected including whether a biopsy site selfie was helpful for definitive site identification. RESULTS In the first phase, the physician and patient were unable to identify the biopsy site 17.6% (49/278) and 25.5% (71/278) of cases, respectively. A photograph was needed in 22.7% of cases (63/278). After implementation of biopsy site selfies, the physician and patient were unable to identify the biopsy site 17.4% (23/132) and 15.2% (20/132) of cases, respectively. Biopsy site selfies were available for 64.1% of cases for which no internal image was available and critical for site identification in 21.4% of these cases. CONCLUSION Biopsy site selfies has proven to be helpful for correct surgical site identification by both the physician and the patient and may also provide further reassurance and confidence for patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)499-504
Number of pages6
JournalDermatologic Surgery
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2015

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Biopsy
Physicians
Photography
Skin Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Biopsy site selfies - A quality improvement pilot study to assist with correct surgical site identification. / Nijhawan, Rajiv I.; Lee, Erica H.; Nehal, Kishwer S.

In: Dermatologic Surgery, Vol. 41, No. 4, 15.04.2015, p. 499-504.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f0390822e4c04172ab5ad50df218ce15,
title = "Biopsy site selfies - A quality improvement pilot study to assist with correct surgical site identification",
abstract = "BACKGROUND Determining the biopsy site location of a skin cancer before treatment is often challenging. OBJECTIVE To study the implementation and effectiveness of biopsy site selfies as a quality improvement measure for correct surgical site identification. MATERIALS AND METHODS In the first phase, the ability of dermatologic surgeon and patient to definitively identify the biopsy site and whether photography was needed to ensure site agreement were recorded. In the second phase, patients were requested to take biopsy site selfies, and after implementation, similar data were collected including whether a biopsy site selfie was helpful for definitive site identification. RESULTS In the first phase, the physician and patient were unable to identify the biopsy site 17.6{\%} (49/278) and 25.5{\%} (71/278) of cases, respectively. A photograph was needed in 22.7{\%} of cases (63/278). After implementation of biopsy site selfies, the physician and patient were unable to identify the biopsy site 17.4{\%} (23/132) and 15.2{\%} (20/132) of cases, respectively. Biopsy site selfies were available for 64.1{\%} of cases for which no internal image was available and critical for site identification in 21.4{\%} of these cases. CONCLUSION Biopsy site selfies has proven to be helpful for correct surgical site identification by both the physician and the patient and may also provide further reassurance and confidence for patients.",
author = "Nijhawan, {Rajiv I.} and Lee, {Erica H.} and Nehal, {Kishwer S.}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/DSS.0000000000000305",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "499--504",
journal = "Dermatologic Surgery",
issn = "1076-0512",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biopsy site selfies - A quality improvement pilot study to assist with correct surgical site identification

AU - Nijhawan, Rajiv I.

AU - Lee, Erica H.

AU - Nehal, Kishwer S.

PY - 2015/4/15

Y1 - 2015/4/15

N2 - BACKGROUND Determining the biopsy site location of a skin cancer before treatment is often challenging. OBJECTIVE To study the implementation and effectiveness of biopsy site selfies as a quality improvement measure for correct surgical site identification. MATERIALS AND METHODS In the first phase, the ability of dermatologic surgeon and patient to definitively identify the biopsy site and whether photography was needed to ensure site agreement were recorded. In the second phase, patients were requested to take biopsy site selfies, and after implementation, similar data were collected including whether a biopsy site selfie was helpful for definitive site identification. RESULTS In the first phase, the physician and patient were unable to identify the biopsy site 17.6% (49/278) and 25.5% (71/278) of cases, respectively. A photograph was needed in 22.7% of cases (63/278). After implementation of biopsy site selfies, the physician and patient were unable to identify the biopsy site 17.4% (23/132) and 15.2% (20/132) of cases, respectively. Biopsy site selfies were available for 64.1% of cases for which no internal image was available and critical for site identification in 21.4% of these cases. CONCLUSION Biopsy site selfies has proven to be helpful for correct surgical site identification by both the physician and the patient and may also provide further reassurance and confidence for patients.

AB - BACKGROUND Determining the biopsy site location of a skin cancer before treatment is often challenging. OBJECTIVE To study the implementation and effectiveness of biopsy site selfies as a quality improvement measure for correct surgical site identification. MATERIALS AND METHODS In the first phase, the ability of dermatologic surgeon and patient to definitively identify the biopsy site and whether photography was needed to ensure site agreement were recorded. In the second phase, patients were requested to take biopsy site selfies, and after implementation, similar data were collected including whether a biopsy site selfie was helpful for definitive site identification. RESULTS In the first phase, the physician and patient were unable to identify the biopsy site 17.6% (49/278) and 25.5% (71/278) of cases, respectively. A photograph was needed in 22.7% of cases (63/278). After implementation of biopsy site selfies, the physician and patient were unable to identify the biopsy site 17.4% (23/132) and 15.2% (20/132) of cases, respectively. Biopsy site selfies were available for 64.1% of cases for which no internal image was available and critical for site identification in 21.4% of these cases. CONCLUSION Biopsy site selfies has proven to be helpful for correct surgical site identification by both the physician and the patient and may also provide further reassurance and confidence for patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927640739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927640739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000305

DO - 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000305

M3 - Article

C2 - 25760559

AN - SCOPUS:84927640739

VL - 41

SP - 499

EP - 504

JO - Dermatologic Surgery

JF - Dermatologic Surgery

SN - 1076-0512

IS - 4

ER -