Birth after previous cesarean delivery: Short-term maternal outcomes

Mona T. Lydon-Rochelle, Alison G. Cahill, Catherine Y. Spong

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An estimated 40% of the 1.3 million cesarean deliveries performed each year in the United States are repeat procedures. The appropriate clinical management approach for women with previous cesarean delivery remains challenging because options are limited. The risks and benefits of clinical management choices in the woman's health need to be quantified. Thus, we discuss the available published scientific data on (1) the short-term maternal outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean and elective repeat cesarean delivery, (2) the differences between outcomes for both, (3) the important factors that influence these outcomes, and (4) successful vs. unsuccessful vaginal birth after cesarean. For women with a previous cesarean delivery, a successful trial of labor offers several distinct, consistently reproducible advantages compared with elective repeat cesarean delivery, including fewer hysterectomies, fewer thromboembolic events, lower blood transfusion rates, and shorter hospital stay. However, when trial of labor after cesarean fails, emergency cesarean is associated with increased uterine rupture, hysterectomy, operative injury, blood transfusion, endometritis, and longer hospital stay. Care of women with a history of previous cesarean delivery involves a confluence of interactions between medical and nonmedical factors; however, the most important determinants of the short-term outcomes among these women are likely individualized counseling, accurate clinical diagnoses, and careful management during a trial of labor. We recommend a randomized controlled trial among women undergoing a TOLAC and a longitudinal cohort study among women with previous cesarean to evaluate adverse outcomes, with focused attention on both mother and the infant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)249-257
Number of pages9
JournalSeminars in Perinatology
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Trial of Labor
Mothers
Parturition
Hysterectomy
Blood Transfusion
Length of Stay
Vaginal Birth after Cesarean
Uterine Rupture
Endometritis
Women's Health
Longitudinal Studies
Counseling
Emergencies
Cohort Studies
Randomized Controlled Trials
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Cesarean
  • NIH Consensus Development Conference
  • Pregnancy outcome
  • Repeat cesarean section
  • Trial of labor
  • Uterine rupture
  • Vaginal birth after cesarean

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Birth after previous cesarean delivery : Short-term maternal outcomes. / Lydon-Rochelle, Mona T.; Cahill, Alison G.; Spong, Catherine Y.

In: Seminars in Perinatology, Vol. 34, No. 4, 01.08.2010, p. 249-257.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Lydon-Rochelle, Mona T. ; Cahill, Alison G. ; Spong, Catherine Y. / Birth after previous cesarean delivery : Short-term maternal outcomes. In: Seminars in Perinatology. 2010 ; Vol. 34, No. 4. pp. 249-257.
@article{c2b865a839a0453eb95439be4d4f90f1,
title = "Birth after previous cesarean delivery: Short-term maternal outcomes",
abstract = "An estimated 40{\%} of the 1.3 million cesarean deliveries performed each year in the United States are repeat procedures. The appropriate clinical management approach for women with previous cesarean delivery remains challenging because options are limited. The risks and benefits of clinical management choices in the woman's health need to be quantified. Thus, we discuss the available published scientific data on (1) the short-term maternal outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean and elective repeat cesarean delivery, (2) the differences between outcomes for both, (3) the important factors that influence these outcomes, and (4) successful vs. unsuccessful vaginal birth after cesarean. For women with a previous cesarean delivery, a successful trial of labor offers several distinct, consistently reproducible advantages compared with elective repeat cesarean delivery, including fewer hysterectomies, fewer thromboembolic events, lower blood transfusion rates, and shorter hospital stay. However, when trial of labor after cesarean fails, emergency cesarean is associated with increased uterine rupture, hysterectomy, operative injury, blood transfusion, endometritis, and longer hospital stay. Care of women with a history of previous cesarean delivery involves a confluence of interactions between medical and nonmedical factors; however, the most important determinants of the short-term outcomes among these women are likely individualized counseling, accurate clinical diagnoses, and careful management during a trial of labor. We recommend a randomized controlled trial among women undergoing a TOLAC and a longitudinal cohort study among women with previous cesarean to evaluate adverse outcomes, with focused attention on both mother and the infant.",
keywords = "Cesarean, NIH Consensus Development Conference, Pregnancy outcome, Repeat cesarean section, Trial of labor, Uterine rupture, Vaginal birth after cesarean",
author = "Lydon-Rochelle, {Mona T.} and Cahill, {Alison G.} and Spong, {Catherine Y.}",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1053/j.semperi.2010.03.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "249--257",
journal = "Seminars in Perinatology",
issn = "0146-0005",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Birth after previous cesarean delivery

T2 - Short-term maternal outcomes

AU - Lydon-Rochelle, Mona T.

AU - Cahill, Alison G.

AU - Spong, Catherine Y.

PY - 2010/8/1

Y1 - 2010/8/1

N2 - An estimated 40% of the 1.3 million cesarean deliveries performed each year in the United States are repeat procedures. The appropriate clinical management approach for women with previous cesarean delivery remains challenging because options are limited. The risks and benefits of clinical management choices in the woman's health need to be quantified. Thus, we discuss the available published scientific data on (1) the short-term maternal outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean and elective repeat cesarean delivery, (2) the differences between outcomes for both, (3) the important factors that influence these outcomes, and (4) successful vs. unsuccessful vaginal birth after cesarean. For women with a previous cesarean delivery, a successful trial of labor offers several distinct, consistently reproducible advantages compared with elective repeat cesarean delivery, including fewer hysterectomies, fewer thromboembolic events, lower blood transfusion rates, and shorter hospital stay. However, when trial of labor after cesarean fails, emergency cesarean is associated with increased uterine rupture, hysterectomy, operative injury, blood transfusion, endometritis, and longer hospital stay. Care of women with a history of previous cesarean delivery involves a confluence of interactions between medical and nonmedical factors; however, the most important determinants of the short-term outcomes among these women are likely individualized counseling, accurate clinical diagnoses, and careful management during a trial of labor. We recommend a randomized controlled trial among women undergoing a TOLAC and a longitudinal cohort study among women with previous cesarean to evaluate adverse outcomes, with focused attention on both mother and the infant.

AB - An estimated 40% of the 1.3 million cesarean deliveries performed each year in the United States are repeat procedures. The appropriate clinical management approach for women with previous cesarean delivery remains challenging because options are limited. The risks and benefits of clinical management choices in the woman's health need to be quantified. Thus, we discuss the available published scientific data on (1) the short-term maternal outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean and elective repeat cesarean delivery, (2) the differences between outcomes for both, (3) the important factors that influence these outcomes, and (4) successful vs. unsuccessful vaginal birth after cesarean. For women with a previous cesarean delivery, a successful trial of labor offers several distinct, consistently reproducible advantages compared with elective repeat cesarean delivery, including fewer hysterectomies, fewer thromboembolic events, lower blood transfusion rates, and shorter hospital stay. However, when trial of labor after cesarean fails, emergency cesarean is associated with increased uterine rupture, hysterectomy, operative injury, blood transfusion, endometritis, and longer hospital stay. Care of women with a history of previous cesarean delivery involves a confluence of interactions between medical and nonmedical factors; however, the most important determinants of the short-term outcomes among these women are likely individualized counseling, accurate clinical diagnoses, and careful management during a trial of labor. We recommend a randomized controlled trial among women undergoing a TOLAC and a longitudinal cohort study among women with previous cesarean to evaluate adverse outcomes, with focused attention on both mother and the infant.

KW - Cesarean

KW - NIH Consensus Development Conference

KW - Pregnancy outcome

KW - Repeat cesarean section

KW - Trial of labor

KW - Uterine rupture

KW - Vaginal birth after cesarean

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955014877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955014877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.03.004

DO - 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.03.004

M3 - Review article

C2 - 20654775

AN - SCOPUS:77955014877

VL - 34

SP - 249

EP - 257

JO - Seminars in Perinatology

JF - Seminars in Perinatology

SN - 0146-0005

IS - 4

ER -