Bite forces after open or closed treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures

E. Ellis, G. S. Throckmorton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This study compared maximum voluntary bite forces in patients who received either open or closed treatment for fractures of the mandibular condylar process. Patients and Methods: One hundred fifty-five patients (127 male, 28 female) with unilateral fractures of the mandibular condylar process (91 treated closed and 64 treated open) were included in this study. Maximum voluntary bite forces were measured at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 3 years after fracture. At each trial, unilateral maximum voluntary bite force was measured at 4 different tooth positions bilaterally using a standard transducer. Electromyography (EMG) of the masseter muscles was also recorded during the bite force measurements, and ratios of the working/balancing side EMG were calculated. Analysis of the data was performed using standard statistical methods. Results: The only significant difference between the 2 samples was in the level of fractures on the condylar process. No patients treated open had fractures of the "head" of the condylar process, whereas there were 11 in the group treated closed. No differences were observed in maximum voluntary bite forces between the 2 treatment groups at any time period, or were there correlations between bite force magnitude and location of the fracture, displacement of the fracture, or any other variable studied. Both groups showed a significant recovery of maximum bite force from the 6-week to the 6-month testing session. For both groups, working/balancing EMG ratios were significantly greater when subjects were biting on the side opposite the fracture. When biting on that side, the working/balancing EMG ratios were higher in the closed treatment group, but the difference did not reach significance. Conclusions: Maximum voluntary bite forces in patients treated for mandibular condylar process fractures do not differ significantly when treatment is open or closed. Neuromuscular adaptations to the fractured mandibular condylar process occur in both groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)389-395
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume59
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Bite Force
Electromyography
Therapeutics
Closed Fractures
Mandibular Fractures
Masseter Muscle
Open Fractures
Transducers
Tooth
Head

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Surgery

Cite this

Bite forces after open or closed treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures. / Ellis, E.; Throckmorton, G. S.

In: Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 59, No. 4, 2001, p. 389-395.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4eb6ff68fe3942f4a9c0d3dbd0ef9568,
title = "Bite forces after open or closed treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures",
abstract = "Purpose: This study compared maximum voluntary bite forces in patients who received either open or closed treatment for fractures of the mandibular condylar process. Patients and Methods: One hundred fifty-five patients (127 male, 28 female) with unilateral fractures of the mandibular condylar process (91 treated closed and 64 treated open) were included in this study. Maximum voluntary bite forces were measured at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 3 years after fracture. At each trial, unilateral maximum voluntary bite force was measured at 4 different tooth positions bilaterally using a standard transducer. Electromyography (EMG) of the masseter muscles was also recorded during the bite force measurements, and ratios of the working/balancing side EMG were calculated. Analysis of the data was performed using standard statistical methods. Results: The only significant difference between the 2 samples was in the level of fractures on the condylar process. No patients treated open had fractures of the {"}head{"} of the condylar process, whereas there were 11 in the group treated closed. No differences were observed in maximum voluntary bite forces between the 2 treatment groups at any time period, or were there correlations between bite force magnitude and location of the fracture, displacement of the fracture, or any other variable studied. Both groups showed a significant recovery of maximum bite force from the 6-week to the 6-month testing session. For both groups, working/balancing EMG ratios were significantly greater when subjects were biting on the side opposite the fracture. When biting on that side, the working/balancing EMG ratios were higher in the closed treatment group, but the difference did not reach significance. Conclusions: Maximum voluntary bite forces in patients treated for mandibular condylar process fractures do not differ significantly when treatment is open or closed. Neuromuscular adaptations to the fractured mandibular condylar process occur in both groups.",
author = "E. Ellis and Throckmorton, {G. S.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1053/joms.2001.21873",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "389--395",
journal = "Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons",
issn = "0278-2391",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bite forces after open or closed treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures

AU - Ellis, E.

AU - Throckmorton, G. S.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Purpose: This study compared maximum voluntary bite forces in patients who received either open or closed treatment for fractures of the mandibular condylar process. Patients and Methods: One hundred fifty-five patients (127 male, 28 female) with unilateral fractures of the mandibular condylar process (91 treated closed and 64 treated open) were included in this study. Maximum voluntary bite forces were measured at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 3 years after fracture. At each trial, unilateral maximum voluntary bite force was measured at 4 different tooth positions bilaterally using a standard transducer. Electromyography (EMG) of the masseter muscles was also recorded during the bite force measurements, and ratios of the working/balancing side EMG were calculated. Analysis of the data was performed using standard statistical methods. Results: The only significant difference between the 2 samples was in the level of fractures on the condylar process. No patients treated open had fractures of the "head" of the condylar process, whereas there were 11 in the group treated closed. No differences were observed in maximum voluntary bite forces between the 2 treatment groups at any time period, or were there correlations between bite force magnitude and location of the fracture, displacement of the fracture, or any other variable studied. Both groups showed a significant recovery of maximum bite force from the 6-week to the 6-month testing session. For both groups, working/balancing EMG ratios were significantly greater when subjects were biting on the side opposite the fracture. When biting on that side, the working/balancing EMG ratios were higher in the closed treatment group, but the difference did not reach significance. Conclusions: Maximum voluntary bite forces in patients treated for mandibular condylar process fractures do not differ significantly when treatment is open or closed. Neuromuscular adaptations to the fractured mandibular condylar process occur in both groups.

AB - Purpose: This study compared maximum voluntary bite forces in patients who received either open or closed treatment for fractures of the mandibular condylar process. Patients and Methods: One hundred fifty-five patients (127 male, 28 female) with unilateral fractures of the mandibular condylar process (91 treated closed and 64 treated open) were included in this study. Maximum voluntary bite forces were measured at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 3 years after fracture. At each trial, unilateral maximum voluntary bite force was measured at 4 different tooth positions bilaterally using a standard transducer. Electromyography (EMG) of the masseter muscles was also recorded during the bite force measurements, and ratios of the working/balancing side EMG were calculated. Analysis of the data was performed using standard statistical methods. Results: The only significant difference between the 2 samples was in the level of fractures on the condylar process. No patients treated open had fractures of the "head" of the condylar process, whereas there were 11 in the group treated closed. No differences were observed in maximum voluntary bite forces between the 2 treatment groups at any time period, or were there correlations between bite force magnitude and location of the fracture, displacement of the fracture, or any other variable studied. Both groups showed a significant recovery of maximum bite force from the 6-week to the 6-month testing session. For both groups, working/balancing EMG ratios were significantly greater when subjects were biting on the side opposite the fracture. When biting on that side, the working/balancing EMG ratios were higher in the closed treatment group, but the difference did not reach significance. Conclusions: Maximum voluntary bite forces in patients treated for mandibular condylar process fractures do not differ significantly when treatment is open or closed. Neuromuscular adaptations to the fractured mandibular condylar process occur in both groups.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035083951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035083951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/joms.2001.21873

DO - 10.1053/joms.2001.21873

M3 - Article

C2 - 11289168

AN - SCOPUS:0035083951

VL - 59

SP - 389

EP - 395

JO - Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

JF - Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

SN - 0278-2391

IS - 4

ER -