TY - JOUR
T1 - Breast cancer risk perceptions and breast cancer worry
T2 - What predicts what?
AU - Lipkus, Isaac
AU - Klein, William
AU - Skinner, Celette Sugg
AU - Rimer, Barbara
N1 - Funding Information:
The National Institute Grants CA72099 and CA105786 supported this study. We thank Deborah Iden and Sonya Green for helping to coordinate the study.
PY - 2005/7
Y1 - 2005/7
N2 - This longitudinal study explored the relationship between perceived breast cancer risk and worry. We measured both absolute and comparative risk perceptions, and also used the Gail algorithm to assess the accuracy of participants' risk perceptions. Three hundred and one women ages 40-75 participated in a two-part study assessing how format of breast cancer risk presentation affected perceptions of risk. Relative to their Gail scores, women were biased pessimistically about their own absolute breast cancer risk and yet largely accurate about their comparative breast cancer risk. Perceived comparative risk, but not perceived absolute risk or biases in absolute or comparative risk, predicted subsequent worry. Worry predicted subsequent perceived absolute risk and biases in absolute and comparative risk. These results suggest that women's emotional reactions to breast cancer risk are based on accurate (unbiased) perceptions of their comparative risks. In turn, greater worry prompts a re-evaluation of absolute risk as well as changes in risk biases. Implications for screening are discussed.
AB - This longitudinal study explored the relationship between perceived breast cancer risk and worry. We measured both absolute and comparative risk perceptions, and also used the Gail algorithm to assess the accuracy of participants' risk perceptions. Three hundred and one women ages 40-75 participated in a two-part study assessing how format of breast cancer risk presentation affected perceptions of risk. Relative to their Gail scores, women were biased pessimistically about their own absolute breast cancer risk and yet largely accurate about their comparative breast cancer risk. Perceived comparative risk, but not perceived absolute risk or biases in absolute or comparative risk, predicted subsequent worry. Worry predicted subsequent perceived absolute risk and biases in absolute and comparative risk. These results suggest that women's emotional reactions to breast cancer risk are based on accurate (unbiased) perceptions of their comparative risks. In turn, greater worry prompts a re-evaluation of absolute risk as well as changes in risk biases. Implications for screening are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=32144432340&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=32144432340&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/1366987042000311018
DO - 10.1080/1366987042000311018
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:32144432340
SN - 1366-9877
VL - 8
SP - 439
EP - 452
JO - Journal of Risk Research
JF - Journal of Risk Research
IS - 5
ER -