Budget impact analysis of conversion from intravenous to oral medication when clinically eligible for oral intake

Brandyn D. Lau, Brian L. Pinto, David R. Thiemann, Christoph U. Lehmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Many patients receive intravenous (IV) medication while clinically eligible for oral (PO) medication intake, which represents a potential for safety improvement and substantial medication cost reduction. Objective: We analyzed the potential hospital medication budget impact associated with converting from IV to PO administration of 4 targeted IV medications, each representing a different class of drug, when patients were clinically eligible for PO medication intake. Methods: Chlorothiazide, voriconazole, levetiracetam, and pantoprazole were identified as 4 costly IV medications with highly bioavailable PO equivalents. Data were extracted from the computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system at Johns Hopkins Hospital and analyzed to determine the doses administered of the 4 identified IV medications, while patients were concurrently receiving PO intake. Results: More than two thirds of adult inpatients were administered IV chlorothiazide, voriconazole, levetiracetam, or pantoprazole while concurrently receiving PO intake. This use of expensive IV medications rather than PO equivalents in patients eligible for PO medication intake added $1,166,759.70 to the yearly cost of care at Johns Hopkins Hospital. Conclusions: Efforts to remind physicians to convert patient orders from IV to PO medications in patients eligible for PO medication intake could have a considerable impact on the total cost of health care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1792-1796
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Therapeutics
Volume33
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Budgets
etiracetam
Chlorothiazide
Medical Order Entry Systems
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health Care Costs
Inpatients
Physicians
Safety
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Budget impact analysis of conversion from intravenous to oral medication when clinically eligible for oral intake. / Lau, Brandyn D.; Pinto, Brian L.; Thiemann, David R.; Lehmann, Christoph U.

In: Clinical Therapeutics, Vol. 33, No. 11, 01.11.2011, p. 1792-1796.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{873c9b09062349da9c5557f7f5d76d6d,
title = "Budget impact analysis of conversion from intravenous to oral medication when clinically eligible for oral intake",
abstract = "Background: Many patients receive intravenous (IV) medication while clinically eligible for oral (PO) medication intake, which represents a potential for safety improvement and substantial medication cost reduction. Objective: We analyzed the potential hospital medication budget impact associated with converting from IV to PO administration of 4 targeted IV medications, each representing a different class of drug, when patients were clinically eligible for PO medication intake. Methods: Chlorothiazide, voriconazole, levetiracetam, and pantoprazole were identified as 4 costly IV medications with highly bioavailable PO equivalents. Data were extracted from the computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system at Johns Hopkins Hospital and analyzed to determine the doses administered of the 4 identified IV medications, while patients were concurrently receiving PO intake. Results: More than two thirds of adult inpatients were administered IV chlorothiazide, voriconazole, levetiracetam, or pantoprazole while concurrently receiving PO intake. This use of expensive IV medications rather than PO equivalents in patients eligible for PO medication intake added $1,166,759.70 to the yearly cost of care at Johns Hopkins Hospital. Conclusions: Efforts to remind physicians to convert patient orders from IV to PO medications in patients eligible for PO medication intake could have a considerable impact on the total cost of health care.",
author = "Lau, {Brandyn D.} and Pinto, {Brian L.} and Thiemann, {David R.} and Lehmann, {Christoph U.}",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.09.030",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "1792--1796",
journal = "Clinical Therapeutics",
issn = "0149-2918",
publisher = "Excerpta Medica",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Budget impact analysis of conversion from intravenous to oral medication when clinically eligible for oral intake

AU - Lau, Brandyn D.

AU - Pinto, Brian L.

AU - Thiemann, David R.

AU - Lehmann, Christoph U.

PY - 2011/11/1

Y1 - 2011/11/1

N2 - Background: Many patients receive intravenous (IV) medication while clinically eligible for oral (PO) medication intake, which represents a potential for safety improvement and substantial medication cost reduction. Objective: We analyzed the potential hospital medication budget impact associated with converting from IV to PO administration of 4 targeted IV medications, each representing a different class of drug, when patients were clinically eligible for PO medication intake. Methods: Chlorothiazide, voriconazole, levetiracetam, and pantoprazole were identified as 4 costly IV medications with highly bioavailable PO equivalents. Data were extracted from the computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system at Johns Hopkins Hospital and analyzed to determine the doses administered of the 4 identified IV medications, while patients were concurrently receiving PO intake. Results: More than two thirds of adult inpatients were administered IV chlorothiazide, voriconazole, levetiracetam, or pantoprazole while concurrently receiving PO intake. This use of expensive IV medications rather than PO equivalents in patients eligible for PO medication intake added $1,166,759.70 to the yearly cost of care at Johns Hopkins Hospital. Conclusions: Efforts to remind physicians to convert patient orders from IV to PO medications in patients eligible for PO medication intake could have a considerable impact on the total cost of health care.

AB - Background: Many patients receive intravenous (IV) medication while clinically eligible for oral (PO) medication intake, which represents a potential for safety improvement and substantial medication cost reduction. Objective: We analyzed the potential hospital medication budget impact associated with converting from IV to PO administration of 4 targeted IV medications, each representing a different class of drug, when patients were clinically eligible for PO medication intake. Methods: Chlorothiazide, voriconazole, levetiracetam, and pantoprazole were identified as 4 costly IV medications with highly bioavailable PO equivalents. Data were extracted from the computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system at Johns Hopkins Hospital and analyzed to determine the doses administered of the 4 identified IV medications, while patients were concurrently receiving PO intake. Results: More than two thirds of adult inpatients were administered IV chlorothiazide, voriconazole, levetiracetam, or pantoprazole while concurrently receiving PO intake. This use of expensive IV medications rather than PO equivalents in patients eligible for PO medication intake added $1,166,759.70 to the yearly cost of care at Johns Hopkins Hospital. Conclusions: Efforts to remind physicians to convert patient orders from IV to PO medications in patients eligible for PO medication intake could have a considerable impact on the total cost of health care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82855179431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82855179431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.09.030

DO - 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.09.030

M3 - Article

C2 - 22001356

AN - SCOPUS:82855179431

VL - 33

SP - 1792

EP - 1796

JO - Clinical Therapeutics

JF - Clinical Therapeutics

SN - 0149-2918

IS - 11

ER -