TY - JOUR
T1 - Can we see and hear at the same time?. Some recent studies of intersensory facilitation of reaction time
AU - Bernstein, Ira H.
N1 - Funding Information:
1 Supported by NPMH grants 1255r) and 17030. The present investigator is grateful to the comments of M. H. Clark, B. A. Edelstein, Dr. P. M. A. Rabbitt, Dr. Marcel Kinsbourne, Dr. Ian John, and Dr. A. F. Sanders. He is aiscr grateful to Victor Ashe: innldR oSert Rose for having run the S’s in the last two cited studies. 21
PY - 1970
Y1 - 1970
N2 - Visual reaction time is facilitated by a simultaneous auditory event. This finding poses a problem for proponents of a single channel theory of attention since the auditory and visual events should be mediated by different input channels, only one of which is accessible to attention and processing at a time. In order to reconcile this discrepancy with single channel theory, two logically independent models were adduced, both of which assume a non-attentional parallel pathway with properties similar to those ascribed to the recticular formation. The first, or energy integration model, assumes that stimulus intensities may add across modalities causing the joint event to be effectively stronger than the visual event alone. The second or preparatory state model assumes that response preparation, defined as a generalized disposition to make an overt response regardless of the specific nature of the response, may proceed in parallel with specific stimulus and response selection and may be initiated by non-attended stimuli. Evidence was found in separate studies to support both models.
AB - Visual reaction time is facilitated by a simultaneous auditory event. This finding poses a problem for proponents of a single channel theory of attention since the auditory and visual events should be mediated by different input channels, only one of which is accessible to attention and processing at a time. In order to reconcile this discrepancy with single channel theory, two logically independent models were adduced, both of which assume a non-attentional parallel pathway with properties similar to those ascribed to the recticular formation. The first, or energy integration model, assumes that stimulus intensities may add across modalities causing the joint event to be effectively stronger than the visual event alone. The second or preparatory state model assumes that response preparation, defined as a generalized disposition to make an overt response regardless of the specific nature of the response, may proceed in parallel with specific stimulus and response selection and may be initiated by non-attended stimuli. Evidence was found in separate studies to support both models.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0014722063&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0014722063&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0001-6918(70)90119-8
DO - 10.1016/0001-6918(70)90119-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 5445965
AN - SCOPUS:0014722063
SN - 0001-6918
VL - 33
SP - 21
EP - 35
JO - Acta Psychologica
JF - Acta Psychologica
IS - C
ER -