Cardiovascular care facts: A report from the national cardiovascular data registry: 2011

Frederick A. Masoudi, Angelo Ponirakis, Robert W. Yeh, Thomas M. Maddox, Jim Beachy, Paul N. Casale, Jeptha P. Curtis, James A de Lemos, Gregg Fonarow, Paul Heidenreich, Christina Koutras, Mark Kremers, John Messenger, Issam Moussa, William J. Oetgen, Matthew T. Roe, Kenneth Rosenfield, Thomas P. Shields, John A. Spertus, Jessica WeiChristopher White, Christopher H. Young, John S. Rumsfeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

95 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this report was to characterize the patients, participating centers, and measures of quality of care and outcomes for 5 NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) programs: 1) ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network) Registry-GWTG (Get With The Guidelines) for acute coronary syndromes; 2) CathPCI Registry for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention; 3) CARE (Carotid Artery Revascularization and Endarterectomy) Registry for carotid revascularization; 4) ICD Registry for implantable cardioverter defibrillators; and the 5) PINNACLE (Practice INNovation And CLinical Excellence) Registry for outpatients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Background CVD is a leading cause of death and disability in the United States. The quality of care for patients with CVD is suboptimal. National registry programs, such as NCDR, permit assessments of the quality of care and outcomes for broad populations of patients with CVD. Methods For the year 2011, we assessed for each of the 5 NCDR programs: 1) demographic and clinical characteristics of enrolled patients; 2) key characteristics of participating centers; 3) measures of processes of care; and 4) patient outcomes. For selected variables, we assessed trends over time. Results In 2011 ACTION Registry-GWTG enrolled 119,967 patients in 567 hospitals; CathPCI enrolled 632,557 patients in 1,337 hospitals; CARE enrolled 4,934 patients in 130 hospitals; ICD enrolled 139,991 patients in 1,435 hospitals; and PINNACLE enrolled 249,198 patients (1,436,328 individual encounters) in 74 practices (1,222 individual providers). Data on performance metrics and outcomes, in some cases risk-adjusted with validated NCDR models, are presented. Conclusions The NCDR provides a unique opportunity to understand the characteristics of large populations of patients with CVD, the centers that provide their care, quality of care provided, and important patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1931-1947
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume62
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 19 2013

Fingerprint

Registries
Quality of Health Care
Cardiovascular Diseases
Carotid Endarterectomy
Carotid Arteries
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Implantable Defibrillators
Population Characteristics
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Coronary Angiography
Cause of Death
Outpatients
Demography
Guidelines

Keywords

  • cardiovascular disease
  • quality of care
  • registries
  • registry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Masoudi, F. A., Ponirakis, A., Yeh, R. W., Maddox, T. M., Beachy, J., Casale, P. N., ... Rumsfeld, J. S. (2013). Cardiovascular care facts: A report from the national cardiovascular data registry: 2011. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 62(21), 1931-1947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.099

Cardiovascular care facts : A report from the national cardiovascular data registry: 2011. / Masoudi, Frederick A.; Ponirakis, Angelo; Yeh, Robert W.; Maddox, Thomas M.; Beachy, Jim; Casale, Paul N.; Curtis, Jeptha P.; de Lemos, James A; Fonarow, Gregg; Heidenreich, Paul; Koutras, Christina; Kremers, Mark; Messenger, John; Moussa, Issam; Oetgen, William J.; Roe, Matthew T.; Rosenfield, Kenneth; Shields, Thomas P.; Spertus, John A.; Wei, Jessica; White, Christopher; Young, Christopher H.; Rumsfeld, John S.

In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 62, No. 21, 19.11.2013, p. 1931-1947.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Masoudi, FA, Ponirakis, A, Yeh, RW, Maddox, TM, Beachy, J, Casale, PN, Curtis, JP, de Lemos, JA, Fonarow, G, Heidenreich, P, Koutras, C, Kremers, M, Messenger, J, Moussa, I, Oetgen, WJ, Roe, MT, Rosenfield, K, Shields, TP, Spertus, JA, Wei, J, White, C, Young, CH & Rumsfeld, JS 2013, 'Cardiovascular care facts: A report from the national cardiovascular data registry: 2011', Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 62, no. 21, pp. 1931-1947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.099
Masoudi, Frederick A. ; Ponirakis, Angelo ; Yeh, Robert W. ; Maddox, Thomas M. ; Beachy, Jim ; Casale, Paul N. ; Curtis, Jeptha P. ; de Lemos, James A ; Fonarow, Gregg ; Heidenreich, Paul ; Koutras, Christina ; Kremers, Mark ; Messenger, John ; Moussa, Issam ; Oetgen, William J. ; Roe, Matthew T. ; Rosenfield, Kenneth ; Shields, Thomas P. ; Spertus, John A. ; Wei, Jessica ; White, Christopher ; Young, Christopher H. ; Rumsfeld, John S. / Cardiovascular care facts : A report from the national cardiovascular data registry: 2011. In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013 ; Vol. 62, No. 21. pp. 1931-1947.
@article{d5f7ba2b4dbe4ab2a9826f290e623568,
title = "Cardiovascular care facts: A report from the national cardiovascular data registry: 2011",
abstract = "Objectives The aim of this report was to characterize the patients, participating centers, and measures of quality of care and outcomes for 5 NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) programs: 1) ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network) Registry-GWTG (Get With The Guidelines) for acute coronary syndromes; 2) CathPCI Registry for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention; 3) CARE (Carotid Artery Revascularization and Endarterectomy) Registry for carotid revascularization; 4) ICD Registry for implantable cardioverter defibrillators; and the 5) PINNACLE (Practice INNovation And CLinical Excellence) Registry for outpatients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Background CVD is a leading cause of death and disability in the United States. The quality of care for patients with CVD is suboptimal. National registry programs, such as NCDR, permit assessments of the quality of care and outcomes for broad populations of patients with CVD. Methods For the year 2011, we assessed for each of the 5 NCDR programs: 1) demographic and clinical characteristics of enrolled patients; 2) key characteristics of participating centers; 3) measures of processes of care; and 4) patient outcomes. For selected variables, we assessed trends over time. Results In 2011 ACTION Registry-GWTG enrolled 119,967 patients in 567 hospitals; CathPCI enrolled 632,557 patients in 1,337 hospitals; CARE enrolled 4,934 patients in 130 hospitals; ICD enrolled 139,991 patients in 1,435 hospitals; and PINNACLE enrolled 249,198 patients (1,436,328 individual encounters) in 74 practices (1,222 individual providers). Data on performance metrics and outcomes, in some cases risk-adjusted with validated NCDR models, are presented. Conclusions The NCDR provides a unique opportunity to understand the characteristics of large populations of patients with CVD, the centers that provide their care, quality of care provided, and important patient outcomes.",
keywords = "cardiovascular disease, quality of care, registries, registry",
author = "Masoudi, {Frederick A.} and Angelo Ponirakis and Yeh, {Robert W.} and Maddox, {Thomas M.} and Jim Beachy and Casale, {Paul N.} and Curtis, {Jeptha P.} and {de Lemos}, {James A} and Gregg Fonarow and Paul Heidenreich and Christina Koutras and Mark Kremers and John Messenger and Issam Moussa and Oetgen, {William J.} and Roe, {Matthew T.} and Kenneth Rosenfield and Shields, {Thomas P.} and Spertus, {John A.} and Jessica Wei and Christopher White and Young, {Christopher H.} and Rumsfeld, {John S.}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.099",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "1931--1947",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "21",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiovascular care facts

T2 - A report from the national cardiovascular data registry: 2011

AU - Masoudi, Frederick A.

AU - Ponirakis, Angelo

AU - Yeh, Robert W.

AU - Maddox, Thomas M.

AU - Beachy, Jim

AU - Casale, Paul N.

AU - Curtis, Jeptha P.

AU - de Lemos, James A

AU - Fonarow, Gregg

AU - Heidenreich, Paul

AU - Koutras, Christina

AU - Kremers, Mark

AU - Messenger, John

AU - Moussa, Issam

AU - Oetgen, William J.

AU - Roe, Matthew T.

AU - Rosenfield, Kenneth

AU - Shields, Thomas P.

AU - Spertus, John A.

AU - Wei, Jessica

AU - White, Christopher

AU - Young, Christopher H.

AU - Rumsfeld, John S.

PY - 2013/11/19

Y1 - 2013/11/19

N2 - Objectives The aim of this report was to characterize the patients, participating centers, and measures of quality of care and outcomes for 5 NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) programs: 1) ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network) Registry-GWTG (Get With The Guidelines) for acute coronary syndromes; 2) CathPCI Registry for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention; 3) CARE (Carotid Artery Revascularization and Endarterectomy) Registry for carotid revascularization; 4) ICD Registry for implantable cardioverter defibrillators; and the 5) PINNACLE (Practice INNovation And CLinical Excellence) Registry for outpatients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Background CVD is a leading cause of death and disability in the United States. The quality of care for patients with CVD is suboptimal. National registry programs, such as NCDR, permit assessments of the quality of care and outcomes for broad populations of patients with CVD. Methods For the year 2011, we assessed for each of the 5 NCDR programs: 1) demographic and clinical characteristics of enrolled patients; 2) key characteristics of participating centers; 3) measures of processes of care; and 4) patient outcomes. For selected variables, we assessed trends over time. Results In 2011 ACTION Registry-GWTG enrolled 119,967 patients in 567 hospitals; CathPCI enrolled 632,557 patients in 1,337 hospitals; CARE enrolled 4,934 patients in 130 hospitals; ICD enrolled 139,991 patients in 1,435 hospitals; and PINNACLE enrolled 249,198 patients (1,436,328 individual encounters) in 74 practices (1,222 individual providers). Data on performance metrics and outcomes, in some cases risk-adjusted with validated NCDR models, are presented. Conclusions The NCDR provides a unique opportunity to understand the characteristics of large populations of patients with CVD, the centers that provide their care, quality of care provided, and important patient outcomes.

AB - Objectives The aim of this report was to characterize the patients, participating centers, and measures of quality of care and outcomes for 5 NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) programs: 1) ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network) Registry-GWTG (Get With The Guidelines) for acute coronary syndromes; 2) CathPCI Registry for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention; 3) CARE (Carotid Artery Revascularization and Endarterectomy) Registry for carotid revascularization; 4) ICD Registry for implantable cardioverter defibrillators; and the 5) PINNACLE (Practice INNovation And CLinical Excellence) Registry for outpatients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Background CVD is a leading cause of death and disability in the United States. The quality of care for patients with CVD is suboptimal. National registry programs, such as NCDR, permit assessments of the quality of care and outcomes for broad populations of patients with CVD. Methods For the year 2011, we assessed for each of the 5 NCDR programs: 1) demographic and clinical characteristics of enrolled patients; 2) key characteristics of participating centers; 3) measures of processes of care; and 4) patient outcomes. For selected variables, we assessed trends over time. Results In 2011 ACTION Registry-GWTG enrolled 119,967 patients in 567 hospitals; CathPCI enrolled 632,557 patients in 1,337 hospitals; CARE enrolled 4,934 patients in 130 hospitals; ICD enrolled 139,991 patients in 1,435 hospitals; and PINNACLE enrolled 249,198 patients (1,436,328 individual encounters) in 74 practices (1,222 individual providers). Data on performance metrics and outcomes, in some cases risk-adjusted with validated NCDR models, are presented. Conclusions The NCDR provides a unique opportunity to understand the characteristics of large populations of patients with CVD, the centers that provide their care, quality of care provided, and important patient outcomes.

KW - cardiovascular disease

KW - quality of care

KW - registries

KW - registry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886857186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886857186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.099

DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.099

M3 - Article

C2 - 24036027

AN - SCOPUS:84886857186

VL - 62

SP - 1931

EP - 1947

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 21

ER -