Characterizing safety-net providers’ HPV vaccine recommendations to undecided parents: A pilot study

L. Aubree Shay, Richard L. Street, Austin S. Baldwin, Emily G. Marks, Simon Craddock Lee, Robin T. Higashi, Celette Sugg Skinner, Sobha Fuller, Donna Persaud, Jasmin A. Tiro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective Although provider recommendation is a key predictor of HPV vaccination, how providers verbalize recommendations particularly strong ones is unknown. We developed a tool to describe strength and content of provider recommendations. Methods We used electronic health records to identify unvaccinated adolescents with appointments at six safety-net clinics in Dallas, Texas. Clinic visit audio-recordings were qualitatively analyzed to identify provider recommendation types (presumptive vs. participatory introduction; strong vs. weak), describe content communicated, and explore patterns between recommendation type and vaccination. Results We analyzed 43 audio-recorded discussions between parents and 12 providers. Most providers used a participatory introduction (42 discussions) and made weak recommendations (24 discussions) by using passive voice or adding a qualification (e.g., not school required). Few providers (11 discussions) gave strong recommendations (clear, personally-owned endorsement). HPV vaccination was lowest for those receiving only weak recommendations and highest when providers coupled the recommendation with an adjacent rationale. Conclusion Our new tool provides initial evidence of how providers undercut their recommendations through qualifications or support them with a rationale. Most providers gave weak HPV vaccine recommendations and used a participatory introduction. Practice implications Providers would benefit from communication skills training on how to make explicit recommendations with an evidence-based rationale.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1452-1460
Number of pages9
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume99
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Safety-net Providers
Papillomavirus Vaccines
Vaccination
Parents
Electronic Health Records
Ambulatory Care
Appointments and Schedules
Communication

Keywords

  • HPV vaccination
  • Patient-provider communication
  • Provide recommendation
  • Qualitative analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Characterizing safety-net providers’ HPV vaccine recommendations to undecided parents : A pilot study. / Shay, L. Aubree; Street, Richard L.; Baldwin, Austin S.; Marks, Emily G.; Lee, Simon Craddock; Higashi, Robin T.; Skinner, Celette Sugg; Fuller, Sobha; Persaud, Donna; Tiro, Jasmin A.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 99, No. 9, 01.09.2016, p. 1452-1460.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shay, L. Aubree ; Street, Richard L. ; Baldwin, Austin S. ; Marks, Emily G. ; Lee, Simon Craddock ; Higashi, Robin T. ; Skinner, Celette Sugg ; Fuller, Sobha ; Persaud, Donna ; Tiro, Jasmin A. / Characterizing safety-net providers’ HPV vaccine recommendations to undecided parents : A pilot study. In: Patient Education and Counseling. 2016 ; Vol. 99, No. 9. pp. 1452-1460.
@article{c4ffcaa475c64152a16fce9a9e9cefc1,
title = "Characterizing safety-net providers’ HPV vaccine recommendations to undecided parents: A pilot study",
abstract = "Objective Although provider recommendation is a key predictor of HPV vaccination, how providers verbalize recommendations particularly strong ones is unknown. We developed a tool to describe strength and content of provider recommendations. Methods We used electronic health records to identify unvaccinated adolescents with appointments at six safety-net clinics in Dallas, Texas. Clinic visit audio-recordings were qualitatively analyzed to identify provider recommendation types (presumptive vs. participatory introduction; strong vs. weak), describe content communicated, and explore patterns between recommendation type and vaccination. Results We analyzed 43 audio-recorded discussions between parents and 12 providers. Most providers used a participatory introduction (42 discussions) and made weak recommendations (24 discussions) by using passive voice or adding a qualification (e.g., not school required). Few providers (11 discussions) gave strong recommendations (clear, personally-owned endorsement). HPV vaccination was lowest for those receiving only weak recommendations and highest when providers coupled the recommendation with an adjacent rationale. Conclusion Our new tool provides initial evidence of how providers undercut their recommendations through qualifications or support them with a rationale. Most providers gave weak HPV vaccine recommendations and used a participatory introduction. Practice implications Providers would benefit from communication skills training on how to make explicit recommendations with an evidence-based rationale.",
keywords = "HPV vaccination, Patient-provider communication, Provide recommendation, Qualitative analysis",
author = "Shay, {L. Aubree} and Street, {Richard L.} and Baldwin, {Austin S.} and Marks, {Emily G.} and Lee, {Simon Craddock} and Higashi, {Robin T.} and Skinner, {Celette Sugg} and Sobha Fuller and Donna Persaud and Tiro, {Jasmin A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2016.06.027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "99",
pages = "1452--1460",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characterizing safety-net providers’ HPV vaccine recommendations to undecided parents

T2 - A pilot study

AU - Shay, L. Aubree

AU - Street, Richard L.

AU - Baldwin, Austin S.

AU - Marks, Emily G.

AU - Lee, Simon Craddock

AU - Higashi, Robin T.

AU - Skinner, Celette Sugg

AU - Fuller, Sobha

AU - Persaud, Donna

AU - Tiro, Jasmin A.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Objective Although provider recommendation is a key predictor of HPV vaccination, how providers verbalize recommendations particularly strong ones is unknown. We developed a tool to describe strength and content of provider recommendations. Methods We used electronic health records to identify unvaccinated adolescents with appointments at six safety-net clinics in Dallas, Texas. Clinic visit audio-recordings were qualitatively analyzed to identify provider recommendation types (presumptive vs. participatory introduction; strong vs. weak), describe content communicated, and explore patterns between recommendation type and vaccination. Results We analyzed 43 audio-recorded discussions between parents and 12 providers. Most providers used a participatory introduction (42 discussions) and made weak recommendations (24 discussions) by using passive voice or adding a qualification (e.g., not school required). Few providers (11 discussions) gave strong recommendations (clear, personally-owned endorsement). HPV vaccination was lowest for those receiving only weak recommendations and highest when providers coupled the recommendation with an adjacent rationale. Conclusion Our new tool provides initial evidence of how providers undercut their recommendations through qualifications or support them with a rationale. Most providers gave weak HPV vaccine recommendations and used a participatory introduction. Practice implications Providers would benefit from communication skills training on how to make explicit recommendations with an evidence-based rationale.

AB - Objective Although provider recommendation is a key predictor of HPV vaccination, how providers verbalize recommendations particularly strong ones is unknown. We developed a tool to describe strength and content of provider recommendations. Methods We used electronic health records to identify unvaccinated adolescents with appointments at six safety-net clinics in Dallas, Texas. Clinic visit audio-recordings were qualitatively analyzed to identify provider recommendation types (presumptive vs. participatory introduction; strong vs. weak), describe content communicated, and explore patterns between recommendation type and vaccination. Results We analyzed 43 audio-recorded discussions between parents and 12 providers. Most providers used a participatory introduction (42 discussions) and made weak recommendations (24 discussions) by using passive voice or adding a qualification (e.g., not school required). Few providers (11 discussions) gave strong recommendations (clear, personally-owned endorsement). HPV vaccination was lowest for those receiving only weak recommendations and highest when providers coupled the recommendation with an adjacent rationale. Conclusion Our new tool provides initial evidence of how providers undercut their recommendations through qualifications or support them with a rationale. Most providers gave weak HPV vaccine recommendations and used a participatory introduction. Practice implications Providers would benefit from communication skills training on how to make explicit recommendations with an evidence-based rationale.

KW - HPV vaccination

KW - Patient-provider communication

KW - Provide recommendation

KW - Qualitative analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991650696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991650696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2016.06.027

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2016.06.027

M3 - Article

C2 - 27401828

AN - SCOPUS:84991650696

VL - 99

SP - 1452

EP - 1460

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 9

ER -