Clarifying the role of urodynamics in the preoperative evaluation of stress urinary incontinence

Sophie G. Fletcher, Gary E. Lemack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It has not yet been definitively demonstrated that preoperative evaluation of women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with urodynamic testing (UDS) enhances surgical outcomes. Nonetheless, UDS is frequently utilized in the assessment of women with SUI in the hopes that results will shed light on preoperative risk factors for failure or postoperative voiding dysfunction. Poorer outcomes for stress incontinence surgery are primarily attributed to intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD), detrusor overactivity (DO), and voiding dysfunction. The ability of UDS to identify and characterize those parameters reliably remains under investigation. Furthermore, debate continues regarding the association of each of those factors with postoperative success for various SUI procedures. Since UDS is invasive, costly, and not always available, it is imperative that its benefit be carefully explored. In this review, we discuss the value of UDS in identifying risk factors for poor outcome and how those risk factors are associated with surgical failure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1259-1268
Number of pages10
JournalTheScientificWorldJournal
Volume8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 25 2008

Fingerprint

Stress Urinary Incontinence
Urodynamics
risk factor
Testing
Surgery
evaluation
woman

Keywords

  • Incontinence
  • Urodynamics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Clarifying the role of urodynamics in the preoperative evaluation of stress urinary incontinence. / Fletcher, Sophie G.; Lemack, Gary E.

In: TheScientificWorldJournal, Vol. 8, 25.12.2008, p. 1259-1268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bed598254c494f9095eb64c4390d7df2,
title = "Clarifying the role of urodynamics in the preoperative evaluation of stress urinary incontinence",
abstract = "It has not yet been definitively demonstrated that preoperative evaluation of women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with urodynamic testing (UDS) enhances surgical outcomes. Nonetheless, UDS is frequently utilized in the assessment of women with SUI in the hopes that results will shed light on preoperative risk factors for failure or postoperative voiding dysfunction. Poorer outcomes for stress incontinence surgery are primarily attributed to intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD), detrusor overactivity (DO), and voiding dysfunction. The ability of UDS to identify and characterize those parameters reliably remains under investigation. Furthermore, debate continues regarding the association of each of those factors with postoperative success for various SUI procedures. Since UDS is invasive, costly, and not always available, it is imperative that its benefit be carefully explored. In this review, we discuss the value of UDS in identifying risk factors for poor outcome and how those risk factors are associated with surgical failure.",
keywords = "Incontinence, Urodynamics",
author = "Fletcher, {Sophie G.} and Lemack, {Gary E.}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1100/tsw.2008.159",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "1259--1268",
journal = "The Scientific World Journal",
issn = "2356-6140",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clarifying the role of urodynamics in the preoperative evaluation of stress urinary incontinence

AU - Fletcher, Sophie G.

AU - Lemack, Gary E.

PY - 2008/12/25

Y1 - 2008/12/25

N2 - It has not yet been definitively demonstrated that preoperative evaluation of women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with urodynamic testing (UDS) enhances surgical outcomes. Nonetheless, UDS is frequently utilized in the assessment of women with SUI in the hopes that results will shed light on preoperative risk factors for failure or postoperative voiding dysfunction. Poorer outcomes for stress incontinence surgery are primarily attributed to intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD), detrusor overactivity (DO), and voiding dysfunction. The ability of UDS to identify and characterize those parameters reliably remains under investigation. Furthermore, debate continues regarding the association of each of those factors with postoperative success for various SUI procedures. Since UDS is invasive, costly, and not always available, it is imperative that its benefit be carefully explored. In this review, we discuss the value of UDS in identifying risk factors for poor outcome and how those risk factors are associated with surgical failure.

AB - It has not yet been definitively demonstrated that preoperative evaluation of women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with urodynamic testing (UDS) enhances surgical outcomes. Nonetheless, UDS is frequently utilized in the assessment of women with SUI in the hopes that results will shed light on preoperative risk factors for failure or postoperative voiding dysfunction. Poorer outcomes for stress incontinence surgery are primarily attributed to intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD), detrusor overactivity (DO), and voiding dysfunction. The ability of UDS to identify and characterize those parameters reliably remains under investigation. Furthermore, debate continues regarding the association of each of those factors with postoperative success for various SUI procedures. Since UDS is invasive, costly, and not always available, it is imperative that its benefit be carefully explored. In this review, we discuss the value of UDS in identifying risk factors for poor outcome and how those risk factors are associated with surgical failure.

KW - Incontinence

KW - Urodynamics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58449091160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58449091160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1100/tsw.2008.159

DO - 10.1100/tsw.2008.159

M3 - Article

C2 - 19112538

AN - SCOPUS:58449091160

VL - 8

SP - 1259

EP - 1268

JO - The Scientific World Journal

JF - The Scientific World Journal

SN - 2356-6140

ER -