Clinical and functional outcomes of patients undergoing anterolateral versus anteromedial surgical approaches for pilon fractures

Brett D. Crist, John R. Worley, Tyler J. Jenkins, Michael S Khazzam, Gregory J. Della Rocca

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Background: This study examined the clinical and functional outcomes for two of the most common surgical approaches for pilon fractures: the anteromedial (AM) and anterolateral (AL) approaches to the distal tibia. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for 75 patients who underwent operative management of pilon fractures between September 2005 and July 2009. Clinical data points included patient demographics, comorbidities, fracture classification, complications, and days from surgery to clinical and radiographic fracture union. Outcome scores were obtained via phone interview at a single cross-section time point. Results: The AL group had a significantly higher average AO/OTA fracture classification than the AM group (AO/OTA 43 C3 vs. C1) in both the retrospective chart review and the phone interview subanalysis. Despite this difference, the AL group had significantly fewer amputations and shorter time to radiographic healing (P<0.05). In the phone interview subanalysis, functional outcome scores were not significantly different (P>0.05). Average time from surgery to survey collection was 3.28 yr for the AL group and 3.54 yr for the AM group. Conclusions: The approach to pilon fractures should be dictated by the specific fracture pattern and associated soft-tissue injury. Our study shows that both AL and AM approaches had equivalent functional outcomes. This study highlights the importance of choosing the correct surgical approach when operating on pilon fractures and that the AL approach can successfully be used to treat the most complex fractures with fewer soft-tissue complications and faster radiographic healing versus the AM approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-60
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Orthopaedic Practice
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Interviews
Soft Tissue Injuries
Tibia
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Amputation
Comorbidity
Demography
Surveys and Questionnaires
Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • anterolateral
  • anteromedial
  • distal tibial fracture
  • outcomes
  • pilon fracture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Clinical and functional outcomes of patients undergoing anterolateral versus anteromedial surgical approaches for pilon fractures. / Crist, Brett D.; Worley, John R.; Jenkins, Tyler J.; Khazzam, Michael S; Della Rocca, Gregory J.

In: Current Orthopaedic Practice, Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 55-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Crist, Brett D. ; Worley, John R. ; Jenkins, Tyler J. ; Khazzam, Michael S ; Della Rocca, Gregory J. / Clinical and functional outcomes of patients undergoing anterolateral versus anteromedial surgical approaches for pilon fractures. In: Current Orthopaedic Practice. 2019 ; Vol. 30, No. 1. pp. 55-60.
@article{66d6bd54d9964075b2e16fc80663cae5,
title = "Clinical and functional outcomes of patients undergoing anterolateral versus anteromedial surgical approaches for pilon fractures",
abstract = "Background: This study examined the clinical and functional outcomes for two of the most common surgical approaches for pilon fractures: the anteromedial (AM) and anterolateral (AL) approaches to the distal tibia. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for 75 patients who underwent operative management of pilon fractures between September 2005 and July 2009. Clinical data points included patient demographics, comorbidities, fracture classification, complications, and days from surgery to clinical and radiographic fracture union. Outcome scores were obtained via phone interview at a single cross-section time point. Results: The AL group had a significantly higher average AO/OTA fracture classification than the AM group (AO/OTA 43 C3 vs. C1) in both the retrospective chart review and the phone interview subanalysis. Despite this difference, the AL group had significantly fewer amputations and shorter time to radiographic healing (P<0.05). In the phone interview subanalysis, functional outcome scores were not significantly different (P>0.05). Average time from surgery to survey collection was 3.28 yr for the AL group and 3.54 yr for the AM group. Conclusions: The approach to pilon fractures should be dictated by the specific fracture pattern and associated soft-tissue injury. Our study shows that both AL and AM approaches had equivalent functional outcomes. This study highlights the importance of choosing the correct surgical approach when operating on pilon fractures and that the AL approach can successfully be used to treat the most complex fractures with fewer soft-tissue complications and faster radiographic healing versus the AM approach.",
keywords = "anterolateral, anteromedial, distal tibial fracture, outcomes, pilon fracture",
author = "Crist, {Brett D.} and Worley, {John R.} and Jenkins, {Tyler J.} and Khazzam, {Michael S} and {Della Rocca}, {Gregory J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BCO.0000000000000701",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "55--60",
journal = "Current Orthopaedic Practice",
issn = "1940-7041",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical and functional outcomes of patients undergoing anterolateral versus anteromedial surgical approaches for pilon fractures

AU - Crist, Brett D.

AU - Worley, John R.

AU - Jenkins, Tyler J.

AU - Khazzam, Michael S

AU - Della Rocca, Gregory J.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: This study examined the clinical and functional outcomes for two of the most common surgical approaches for pilon fractures: the anteromedial (AM) and anterolateral (AL) approaches to the distal tibia. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for 75 patients who underwent operative management of pilon fractures between September 2005 and July 2009. Clinical data points included patient demographics, comorbidities, fracture classification, complications, and days from surgery to clinical and radiographic fracture union. Outcome scores were obtained via phone interview at a single cross-section time point. Results: The AL group had a significantly higher average AO/OTA fracture classification than the AM group (AO/OTA 43 C3 vs. C1) in both the retrospective chart review and the phone interview subanalysis. Despite this difference, the AL group had significantly fewer amputations and shorter time to radiographic healing (P<0.05). In the phone interview subanalysis, functional outcome scores were not significantly different (P>0.05). Average time from surgery to survey collection was 3.28 yr for the AL group and 3.54 yr for the AM group. Conclusions: The approach to pilon fractures should be dictated by the specific fracture pattern and associated soft-tissue injury. Our study shows that both AL and AM approaches had equivalent functional outcomes. This study highlights the importance of choosing the correct surgical approach when operating on pilon fractures and that the AL approach can successfully be used to treat the most complex fractures with fewer soft-tissue complications and faster radiographic healing versus the AM approach.

AB - Background: This study examined the clinical and functional outcomes for two of the most common surgical approaches for pilon fractures: the anteromedial (AM) and anterolateral (AL) approaches to the distal tibia. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for 75 patients who underwent operative management of pilon fractures between September 2005 and July 2009. Clinical data points included patient demographics, comorbidities, fracture classification, complications, and days from surgery to clinical and radiographic fracture union. Outcome scores were obtained via phone interview at a single cross-section time point. Results: The AL group had a significantly higher average AO/OTA fracture classification than the AM group (AO/OTA 43 C3 vs. C1) in both the retrospective chart review and the phone interview subanalysis. Despite this difference, the AL group had significantly fewer amputations and shorter time to radiographic healing (P<0.05). In the phone interview subanalysis, functional outcome scores were not significantly different (P>0.05). Average time from surgery to survey collection was 3.28 yr for the AL group and 3.54 yr for the AM group. Conclusions: The approach to pilon fractures should be dictated by the specific fracture pattern and associated soft-tissue injury. Our study shows that both AL and AM approaches had equivalent functional outcomes. This study highlights the importance of choosing the correct surgical approach when operating on pilon fractures and that the AL approach can successfully be used to treat the most complex fractures with fewer soft-tissue complications and faster radiographic healing versus the AM approach.

KW - anterolateral

KW - anteromedial

KW - distal tibial fracture

KW - outcomes

KW - pilon fracture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061189502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061189502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BCO.0000000000000701

DO - 10.1097/BCO.0000000000000701

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85061189502

VL - 30

SP - 55

EP - 60

JO - Current Orthopaedic Practice

JF - Current Orthopaedic Practice

SN - 1940-7041

IS - 1

ER -