Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment

Pat Fox Fulgham, Dean G. Assimos, Margaret S Pearle, Glenn M. Preminger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

137 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This technology assessment addresses the optimal use of imaging in the evaluation and treatment of patients with suspected or documented ureteral stones. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search addressing 4 guiding questions was performed for full text in English articles published between January 1990 and July 2011. The search focused on major subtopics associated with the imaging of ureteral calculi, and included specific imaging modalities used in the diagnosis and management of ureteral calculous disease such as unenhanced (noncontrast) computerized tomography, conventional radiography, ultrasound, excretory urography, magnetic resonance imaging and nuclear medicine studies. Protocols (in the form of decision tree algorithms) were developed based on this literature review and in some instances on panel opinion. The 4 questions addressed were 1) What imaging study should be performed for suspected ureteral calculous disease? 2) What information should be obtained? 3) After diagnosis of a ureteral calculus, what followup imaging should be used? 4) After treatment of a ureteral calculus, what followup imaging studies should be obtained? Results: Based on these protocols, noncontrast computerized tomography is recommended to establish the diagnosis in most cases, with a low energy protocol advocated if body habitus is favorable. Conventional radiography and ultrasound are endorsed for monitoring the passage of most radiopaque stones as well as for most patients undergoing stone removal. Other studies may be indicated based on imaging findings, and patient, stone and clinical factors. Conclusions: The protocols generated assist the clinician in establishing the diagnosis of ureteral calculous disease, monitoring stone passage and following patients after treatment. The protocols take into account not only clinical effectiveness but also cost-effectiveness and risk/harm associated with the various imaging modalities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1203-1213
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume189
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Ureteral Diseases
Biomedical Technology Assessment
Ureteral Calculi
Clinical Protocols
Radiography
Tomography
Decision Trees
Urography
Nuclear Medicine
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Therapeutics
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Keywords

  • clinical protocols
  • diagnostic imaging
  • ureteral calculi

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease : AUA technology assessment. / Fulgham, Pat Fox; Assimos, Dean G.; Pearle, Margaret S; Preminger, Glenn M.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 189, No. 4, 04.2013, p. 1203-1213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fulgham, Pat Fox ; Assimos, Dean G. ; Pearle, Margaret S ; Preminger, Glenn M. / Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease : AUA technology assessment. In: Journal of Urology. 2013 ; Vol. 189, No. 4. pp. 1203-1213.
@article{47f9692e4ef24c8c95e2c62110757709,
title = "Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment",
abstract = "Purpose: This technology assessment addresses the optimal use of imaging in the evaluation and treatment of patients with suspected or documented ureteral stones. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search addressing 4 guiding questions was performed for full text in English articles published between January 1990 and July 2011. The search focused on major subtopics associated with the imaging of ureteral calculi, and included specific imaging modalities used in the diagnosis and management of ureteral calculous disease such as unenhanced (noncontrast) computerized tomography, conventional radiography, ultrasound, excretory urography, magnetic resonance imaging and nuclear medicine studies. Protocols (in the form of decision tree algorithms) were developed based on this literature review and in some instances on panel opinion. The 4 questions addressed were 1) What imaging study should be performed for suspected ureteral calculous disease? 2) What information should be obtained? 3) After diagnosis of a ureteral calculus, what followup imaging should be used? 4) After treatment of a ureteral calculus, what followup imaging studies should be obtained? Results: Based on these protocols, noncontrast computerized tomography is recommended to establish the diagnosis in most cases, with a low energy protocol advocated if body habitus is favorable. Conventional radiography and ultrasound are endorsed for monitoring the passage of most radiopaque stones as well as for most patients undergoing stone removal. Other studies may be indicated based on imaging findings, and patient, stone and clinical factors. Conclusions: The protocols generated assist the clinician in establishing the diagnosis of ureteral calculous disease, monitoring stone passage and following patients after treatment. The protocols take into account not only clinical effectiveness but also cost-effectiveness and risk/harm associated with the various imaging modalities.",
keywords = "clinical protocols, diagnostic imaging, ureteral calculi",
author = "Fulgham, {Pat Fox} and Assimos, {Dean G.} and Pearle, {Margaret S} and Preminger, {Glenn M.}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "189",
pages = "1203--1213",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease

T2 - AUA technology assessment

AU - Fulgham, Pat Fox

AU - Assimos, Dean G.

AU - Pearle, Margaret S

AU - Preminger, Glenn M.

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Purpose: This technology assessment addresses the optimal use of imaging in the evaluation and treatment of patients with suspected or documented ureteral stones. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search addressing 4 guiding questions was performed for full text in English articles published between January 1990 and July 2011. The search focused on major subtopics associated with the imaging of ureteral calculi, and included specific imaging modalities used in the diagnosis and management of ureteral calculous disease such as unenhanced (noncontrast) computerized tomography, conventional radiography, ultrasound, excretory urography, magnetic resonance imaging and nuclear medicine studies. Protocols (in the form of decision tree algorithms) were developed based on this literature review and in some instances on panel opinion. The 4 questions addressed were 1) What imaging study should be performed for suspected ureteral calculous disease? 2) What information should be obtained? 3) After diagnosis of a ureteral calculus, what followup imaging should be used? 4) After treatment of a ureteral calculus, what followup imaging studies should be obtained? Results: Based on these protocols, noncontrast computerized tomography is recommended to establish the diagnosis in most cases, with a low energy protocol advocated if body habitus is favorable. Conventional radiography and ultrasound are endorsed for monitoring the passage of most radiopaque stones as well as for most patients undergoing stone removal. Other studies may be indicated based on imaging findings, and patient, stone and clinical factors. Conclusions: The protocols generated assist the clinician in establishing the diagnosis of ureteral calculous disease, monitoring stone passage and following patients after treatment. The protocols take into account not only clinical effectiveness but also cost-effectiveness and risk/harm associated with the various imaging modalities.

AB - Purpose: This technology assessment addresses the optimal use of imaging in the evaluation and treatment of patients with suspected or documented ureteral stones. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search addressing 4 guiding questions was performed for full text in English articles published between January 1990 and July 2011. The search focused on major subtopics associated with the imaging of ureteral calculi, and included specific imaging modalities used in the diagnosis and management of ureteral calculous disease such as unenhanced (noncontrast) computerized tomography, conventional radiography, ultrasound, excretory urography, magnetic resonance imaging and nuclear medicine studies. Protocols (in the form of decision tree algorithms) were developed based on this literature review and in some instances on panel opinion. The 4 questions addressed were 1) What imaging study should be performed for suspected ureteral calculous disease? 2) What information should be obtained? 3) After diagnosis of a ureteral calculus, what followup imaging should be used? 4) After treatment of a ureteral calculus, what followup imaging studies should be obtained? Results: Based on these protocols, noncontrast computerized tomography is recommended to establish the diagnosis in most cases, with a low energy protocol advocated if body habitus is favorable. Conventional radiography and ultrasound are endorsed for monitoring the passage of most radiopaque stones as well as for most patients undergoing stone removal. Other studies may be indicated based on imaging findings, and patient, stone and clinical factors. Conclusions: The protocols generated assist the clinician in establishing the diagnosis of ureteral calculous disease, monitoring stone passage and following patients after treatment. The protocols take into account not only clinical effectiveness but also cost-effectiveness and risk/harm associated with the various imaging modalities.

KW - clinical protocols

KW - diagnostic imaging

KW - ureteral calculi

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875924857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875924857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.031

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.031

M3 - Article

C2 - 23085059

AN - SCOPUS:84875924857

VL - 189

SP - 1203

EP - 1213

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 4

ER -