Clinical impact of radiograph misinterpretation in a pediatric ED and the effect of physician training level

Christine M. Walsh-Kelly, Marlene D. Melzer-Lange, Halim M. Hennes, Patricia Lye, Mary Hegenbarth, John Sty, Robert Starshak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

Radiograph interpretation in the pediatric emergency department (ED) is commonly performed by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) attendings or physicians-in-training. This study examines the effect of physician training level on radiograph interpretation and the clinical impact of false-negative radiograph interpretations. Data were collected on 1,471 radiographs of the chest, abdomen, extremity, lateral neck, and cervical spine interpreted by PEM attendings, one PEM fellow, one physician assistant, and emergency medicine, pediatric and family practice residents. Two hundred radiographs (14%) were misinterpreted, including 141 chest (16%), 24 extremity (8%), 20 abdomen (12%), 14 lateral neck (18%), and 1 cervical spine radiograph (2%). Physicians-in-training misinterpreted 16% of their radiographs versus 11% for PEM attendings (P = .01). Twenty (1.4%) radiographs had clinically significant (false-negative) misinterpretations, including 1.7% of physician-in-training and 0.8% of attending interpretations (P = 0.15). No morbidity resulted from the delay in correct interpretation. Radiograph misinterpretation by ED physicians occurs but is unlikely to result in significant morbidity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)262-264
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1995

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • emergency medicine
  • Radiographs
  • risk management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this