Clinical impact of radiograph misinterpretation in a pediatric ED and the effect of physician training level

Christine M. Walsh-Kelly, Marlene D. Melzer-Lange, Halim M. Hennes, Patricia Lye, Mary Hegenbarth, John Sty, Robert Starshak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Radiograph interpretation in the pediatric emergency department (ED) is commonly performed by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) attendings or physicians-in-training. This study examines the effect of physician training level on radiograph interpretation and the clinical impact of false-negative radiograph interpretations. Data were collected on 1,471 radiographs of the chest, abdomen, extremity, lateral neck, and cervical spine interpreted by PEM attendings, one PEM fellow, one physician assistant, and emergency medicine, pediatric and family practice residents. Two hundred radiographs (14%) were misinterpreted, including 141 chest (16%), 24 extremity (8%), 20 abdomen (12%), 14 lateral neck (18%), and 1 cervical spine radiograph (2%). Physicians-in-training misinterpreted 16% of their radiographs versus 11% for PEM attendings (P = .01). Twenty (1.4%) radiographs had clinically significant (false-negative) misinterpretations, including 1.7% of physician-in-training and 0.8% of attending interpretations (P = 0.15). No morbidity resulted from the delay in correct interpretation. Radiograph misinterpretation by ED physicians occurs but is unlikely to result in significant morbidity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)262-264
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Pediatrics
Physicians
Abdomen
Spine
Neck
Thorax
Extremities
Morbidity
Physician Assistants
Family Practice
Pediatric Emergency Medicine

Keywords

  • emergency medicine
  • Radiographs
  • risk management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Clinical impact of radiograph misinterpretation in a pediatric ED and the effect of physician training level. / Walsh-Kelly, Christine M.; Melzer-Lange, Marlene D.; Hennes, Halim M.; Lye, Patricia; Hegenbarth, Mary; Sty, John; Starshak, Robert.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1995, p. 262-264.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Walsh-Kelly, Christine M. ; Melzer-Lange, Marlene D. ; Hennes, Halim M. ; Lye, Patricia ; Hegenbarth, Mary ; Sty, John ; Starshak, Robert. / Clinical impact of radiograph misinterpretation in a pediatric ED and the effect of physician training level. In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 1995 ; Vol. 13, No. 3. pp. 262-264.
@article{2a98b514a27640b0a1f396c52ea4ffc9,
title = "Clinical impact of radiograph misinterpretation in a pediatric ED and the effect of physician training level",
abstract = "Radiograph interpretation in the pediatric emergency department (ED) is commonly performed by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) attendings or physicians-in-training. This study examines the effect of physician training level on radiograph interpretation and the clinical impact of false-negative radiograph interpretations. Data were collected on 1,471 radiographs of the chest, abdomen, extremity, lateral neck, and cervical spine interpreted by PEM attendings, one PEM fellow, one physician assistant, and emergency medicine, pediatric and family practice residents. Two hundred radiographs (14{\%}) were misinterpreted, including 141 chest (16{\%}), 24 extremity (8{\%}), 20 abdomen (12{\%}), 14 lateral neck (18{\%}), and 1 cervical spine radiograph (2{\%}). Physicians-in-training misinterpreted 16{\%} of their radiographs versus 11{\%} for PEM attendings (P = .01). Twenty (1.4{\%}) radiographs had clinically significant (false-negative) misinterpretations, including 1.7{\%} of physician-in-training and 0.8{\%} of attending interpretations (P = 0.15). No morbidity resulted from the delay in correct interpretation. Radiograph misinterpretation by ED physicians occurs but is unlikely to result in significant morbidity.",
keywords = "emergency medicine, Radiographs, risk management",
author = "Walsh-Kelly, {Christine M.} and Melzer-Lange, {Marlene D.} and Hennes, {Halim M.} and Patricia Lye and Mary Hegenbarth and John Sty and Robert Starshak",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1016/0735-6757(95)90196-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "262--264",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical impact of radiograph misinterpretation in a pediatric ED and the effect of physician training level

AU - Walsh-Kelly, Christine M.

AU - Melzer-Lange, Marlene D.

AU - Hennes, Halim M.

AU - Lye, Patricia

AU - Hegenbarth, Mary

AU - Sty, John

AU - Starshak, Robert

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Radiograph interpretation in the pediatric emergency department (ED) is commonly performed by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) attendings or physicians-in-training. This study examines the effect of physician training level on radiograph interpretation and the clinical impact of false-negative radiograph interpretations. Data were collected on 1,471 radiographs of the chest, abdomen, extremity, lateral neck, and cervical spine interpreted by PEM attendings, one PEM fellow, one physician assistant, and emergency medicine, pediatric and family practice residents. Two hundred radiographs (14%) were misinterpreted, including 141 chest (16%), 24 extremity (8%), 20 abdomen (12%), 14 lateral neck (18%), and 1 cervical spine radiograph (2%). Physicians-in-training misinterpreted 16% of their radiographs versus 11% for PEM attendings (P = .01). Twenty (1.4%) radiographs had clinically significant (false-negative) misinterpretations, including 1.7% of physician-in-training and 0.8% of attending interpretations (P = 0.15). No morbidity resulted from the delay in correct interpretation. Radiograph misinterpretation by ED physicians occurs but is unlikely to result in significant morbidity.

AB - Radiograph interpretation in the pediatric emergency department (ED) is commonly performed by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) attendings or physicians-in-training. This study examines the effect of physician training level on radiograph interpretation and the clinical impact of false-negative radiograph interpretations. Data were collected on 1,471 radiographs of the chest, abdomen, extremity, lateral neck, and cervical spine interpreted by PEM attendings, one PEM fellow, one physician assistant, and emergency medicine, pediatric and family practice residents. Two hundred radiographs (14%) were misinterpreted, including 141 chest (16%), 24 extremity (8%), 20 abdomen (12%), 14 lateral neck (18%), and 1 cervical spine radiograph (2%). Physicians-in-training misinterpreted 16% of their radiographs versus 11% for PEM attendings (P = .01). Twenty (1.4%) radiographs had clinically significant (false-negative) misinterpretations, including 1.7% of physician-in-training and 0.8% of attending interpretations (P = 0.15). No morbidity resulted from the delay in correct interpretation. Radiograph misinterpretation by ED physicians occurs but is unlikely to result in significant morbidity.

KW - emergency medicine

KW - Radiographs

KW - risk management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029019714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029019714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0735-6757(95)90196-5

DO - 10.1016/0735-6757(95)90196-5

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 262

EP - 264

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

IS - 3

ER -