Cochlear Implantation in Canal Wall Down Mastoid Cavities

Jacob B. Hunter, Shanik J. Fernando, Marc L. Bennett, David S. Haynes, George B. Wanna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cochlear implantation in canal wall down mastoid (CWD) cavities is fraught with the issue of how best to manage the mastoid cavity. Decision points include whether the external auditory meatus should be overclosed, whether the implantation should be staged, or even if the eustachian tube should be plugged. Given these options, we sought to describe our experience of cochlear implantation in CWD cavities. Among evaluation of subjects ≥18 years of age, 9 had cochlear implants placed in CWD mastoid cavities, 7 of which had the external auditory meatus overclosed, while 2 maintained open cavities following implantation. With an average follow-up of 36.7 months (median, 22.8 months), 2 subjects who had overclosure developed meatal dehiscences requiring further intervention, while no complications were observed in the 2 patients who maintained open cavities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)312-316
Number of pages5
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)
Volume155
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

Fingerprint

Cochlear Implantation
Mastoid
Eustachian Tube
Cochlear Implants

Keywords

  • canal wall down
  • cochlear implantation
  • mastoid cavity
  • radical

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Cochlear Implantation in Canal Wall Down Mastoid Cavities. / Hunter, Jacob B.; Fernando, Shanik J.; Bennett, Marc L.; Haynes, David S.; Wanna, George B.

In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States), Vol. 155, No. 2, 01.08.2016, p. 312-316.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hunter, Jacob B. ; Fernando, Shanik J. ; Bennett, Marc L. ; Haynes, David S. ; Wanna, George B. / Cochlear Implantation in Canal Wall Down Mastoid Cavities. In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States). 2016 ; Vol. 155, No. 2. pp. 312-316.
@article{02b599fa10bd434887cb564be24f95e8,
title = "Cochlear Implantation in Canal Wall Down Mastoid Cavities",
abstract = "Cochlear implantation in canal wall down mastoid (CWD) cavities is fraught with the issue of how best to manage the mastoid cavity. Decision points include whether the external auditory meatus should be overclosed, whether the implantation should be staged, or even if the eustachian tube should be plugged. Given these options, we sought to describe our experience of cochlear implantation in CWD cavities. Among evaluation of subjects ≥18 years of age, 9 had cochlear implants placed in CWD mastoid cavities, 7 of which had the external auditory meatus overclosed, while 2 maintained open cavities following implantation. With an average follow-up of 36.7 months (median, 22.8 months), 2 subjects who had overclosure developed meatal dehiscences requiring further intervention, while no complications were observed in the 2 patients who maintained open cavities.",
keywords = "canal wall down, cochlear implantation, mastoid cavity, radical",
author = "Hunter, {Jacob B.} and Fernando, {Shanik J.} and Bennett, {Marc L.} and Haynes, {David S.} and Wanna, {George B.}",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0194599816641064",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "155",
pages = "312--316",
journal = "Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)",
issn = "0194-5998",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cochlear Implantation in Canal Wall Down Mastoid Cavities

AU - Hunter, Jacob B.

AU - Fernando, Shanik J.

AU - Bennett, Marc L.

AU - Haynes, David S.

AU - Wanna, George B.

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Cochlear implantation in canal wall down mastoid (CWD) cavities is fraught with the issue of how best to manage the mastoid cavity. Decision points include whether the external auditory meatus should be overclosed, whether the implantation should be staged, or even if the eustachian tube should be plugged. Given these options, we sought to describe our experience of cochlear implantation in CWD cavities. Among evaluation of subjects ≥18 years of age, 9 had cochlear implants placed in CWD mastoid cavities, 7 of which had the external auditory meatus overclosed, while 2 maintained open cavities following implantation. With an average follow-up of 36.7 months (median, 22.8 months), 2 subjects who had overclosure developed meatal dehiscences requiring further intervention, while no complications were observed in the 2 patients who maintained open cavities.

AB - Cochlear implantation in canal wall down mastoid (CWD) cavities is fraught with the issue of how best to manage the mastoid cavity. Decision points include whether the external auditory meatus should be overclosed, whether the implantation should be staged, or even if the eustachian tube should be plugged. Given these options, we sought to describe our experience of cochlear implantation in CWD cavities. Among evaluation of subjects ≥18 years of age, 9 had cochlear implants placed in CWD mastoid cavities, 7 of which had the external auditory meatus overclosed, while 2 maintained open cavities following implantation. With an average follow-up of 36.7 months (median, 22.8 months), 2 subjects who had overclosure developed meatal dehiscences requiring further intervention, while no complications were observed in the 2 patients who maintained open cavities.

KW - canal wall down

KW - cochlear implantation

KW - mastoid cavity

KW - radical

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84980398129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84980398129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0194599816641064

DO - 10.1177/0194599816641064

M3 - Article

C2 - 26980904

AN - SCOPUS:84980398129

VL - 155

SP - 312

EP - 316

JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

SN - 0194-5998

IS - 2

ER -