Code status and resuscitation options in the electronic health record

Haresh L. Bhatia, Neal R. Patel, Neesha N. Choma, Jonathan Grande, Dario A. Giuse, Christoph U. Lehmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: The advance discussion and documentation of code-status is important in preventing undesired cardiopulmonary resuscitation and related end of life interventions. Code-status documentation remains infrequent and paper-based, which limits its usefulness. This study evaluates a tool to document code-status in the electronic health records at a large teaching hospital, and analyzes the corresponding data. Methods: Encounter data for patients admitted to the Medical Center were collected over a period of 12 months (01-APR-2012-31-MAR-2013) and the code-status attribute was tracked for individual patients. The code-status data were analyzed separately for adult and pediatric patient populations. We considered 131,399 encounters for 83,248 adult patients and 80,778 encounters for 55,656 pediatric patients in this study. Results: 71% of the adult patients and 30% of the pediatric patients studied had a documented code-status. Age and severity of illness influenced the decision to document code-status. Demographics such as gender, race, ethnicity, and proximity of primary residence were also associated with the documentation of code-status. Conclusion: Absence of a recorded code-status may result in unnecessary interventions. Code-status in paper charts may be difficult to access in cardiopulmonary arrest situations and may result in unnecessary and unwanted interventions and procedures. Documentation of code-status in electronic records creates a readily available reference for care providers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)14-20
Number of pages7
JournalResuscitation
Volume87
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Resuscitation
Documentation
Pediatrics
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Heart Arrest
Teaching Hospitals
Demography
Population

Keywords

  • Advance directives
  • Code status
  • Electronic health record
  • End of life care
  • Provider communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Emergency
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Code status and resuscitation options in the electronic health record. / Bhatia, Haresh L.; Patel, Neal R.; Choma, Neesha N.; Grande, Jonathan; Giuse, Dario A.; Lehmann, Christoph U.

In: Resuscitation, Vol. 87, 01.02.2015, p. 14-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bhatia, Haresh L. ; Patel, Neal R. ; Choma, Neesha N. ; Grande, Jonathan ; Giuse, Dario A. ; Lehmann, Christoph U. / Code status and resuscitation options in the electronic health record. In: Resuscitation. 2015 ; Vol. 87. pp. 14-20.
@article{f03ce539472b42489dcc9fa59f9da8b1,
title = "Code status and resuscitation options in the electronic health record",
abstract = "Aim: The advance discussion and documentation of code-status is important in preventing undesired cardiopulmonary resuscitation and related end of life interventions. Code-status documentation remains infrequent and paper-based, which limits its usefulness. This study evaluates a tool to document code-status in the electronic health records at a large teaching hospital, and analyzes the corresponding data. Methods: Encounter data for patients admitted to the Medical Center were collected over a period of 12 months (01-APR-2012-31-MAR-2013) and the code-status attribute was tracked for individual patients. The code-status data were analyzed separately for adult and pediatric patient populations. We considered 131,399 encounters for 83,248 adult patients and 80,778 encounters for 55,656 pediatric patients in this study. Results: 71{\%} of the adult patients and 30{\%} of the pediatric patients studied had a documented code-status. Age and severity of illness influenced the decision to document code-status. Demographics such as gender, race, ethnicity, and proximity of primary residence were also associated with the documentation of code-status. Conclusion: Absence of a recorded code-status may result in unnecessary interventions. Code-status in paper charts may be difficult to access in cardiopulmonary arrest situations and may result in unnecessary and unwanted interventions and procedures. Documentation of code-status in electronic records creates a readily available reference for care providers.",
keywords = "Advance directives, Code status, Electronic health record, End of life care, Provider communication",
author = "Bhatia, {Haresh L.} and Patel, {Neal R.} and Choma, {Neesha N.} and Jonathan Grande and Giuse, {Dario A.} and Lehmann, {Christoph U.}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.10.022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "14--20",
journal = "Resuscitation",
issn = "0300-9572",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Code status and resuscitation options in the electronic health record

AU - Bhatia, Haresh L.

AU - Patel, Neal R.

AU - Choma, Neesha N.

AU - Grande, Jonathan

AU - Giuse, Dario A.

AU - Lehmann, Christoph U.

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Aim: The advance discussion and documentation of code-status is important in preventing undesired cardiopulmonary resuscitation and related end of life interventions. Code-status documentation remains infrequent and paper-based, which limits its usefulness. This study evaluates a tool to document code-status in the electronic health records at a large teaching hospital, and analyzes the corresponding data. Methods: Encounter data for patients admitted to the Medical Center were collected over a period of 12 months (01-APR-2012-31-MAR-2013) and the code-status attribute was tracked for individual patients. The code-status data were analyzed separately for adult and pediatric patient populations. We considered 131,399 encounters for 83,248 adult patients and 80,778 encounters for 55,656 pediatric patients in this study. Results: 71% of the adult patients and 30% of the pediatric patients studied had a documented code-status. Age and severity of illness influenced the decision to document code-status. Demographics such as gender, race, ethnicity, and proximity of primary residence were also associated with the documentation of code-status. Conclusion: Absence of a recorded code-status may result in unnecessary interventions. Code-status in paper charts may be difficult to access in cardiopulmonary arrest situations and may result in unnecessary and unwanted interventions and procedures. Documentation of code-status in electronic records creates a readily available reference for care providers.

AB - Aim: The advance discussion and documentation of code-status is important in preventing undesired cardiopulmonary resuscitation and related end of life interventions. Code-status documentation remains infrequent and paper-based, which limits its usefulness. This study evaluates a tool to document code-status in the electronic health records at a large teaching hospital, and analyzes the corresponding data. Methods: Encounter data for patients admitted to the Medical Center were collected over a period of 12 months (01-APR-2012-31-MAR-2013) and the code-status attribute was tracked for individual patients. The code-status data were analyzed separately for adult and pediatric patient populations. We considered 131,399 encounters for 83,248 adult patients and 80,778 encounters for 55,656 pediatric patients in this study. Results: 71% of the adult patients and 30% of the pediatric patients studied had a documented code-status. Age and severity of illness influenced the decision to document code-status. Demographics such as gender, race, ethnicity, and proximity of primary residence were also associated with the documentation of code-status. Conclusion: Absence of a recorded code-status may result in unnecessary interventions. Code-status in paper charts may be difficult to access in cardiopulmonary arrest situations and may result in unnecessary and unwanted interventions and procedures. Documentation of code-status in electronic records creates a readily available reference for care providers.

KW - Advance directives

KW - Code status

KW - Electronic health record

KW - End of life care

KW - Provider communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920911346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920911346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.10.022

DO - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.10.022

M3 - Article

C2 - 25447035

AN - SCOPUS:84920911346

VL - 87

SP - 14

EP - 20

JO - Resuscitation

JF - Resuscitation

SN - 0300-9572

ER -