Combat Casualty Hand Burns: Evaluating Impairment and Disability during Recovery

Ted T. Chapman, Reg L. Richard, Travis L. Hedman, Evan M. Renz, Steve E. Wolf, John B. Holcomb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study evaluated the use of the American Medical Association (AMA) impairment guides and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire in U.S. military casualties recovering from burn injury to the hand. Study sample included patients with burns to at least one hand and complete evaluations of impairment and disability upon discharge from the hospital and at a follow-up visit less than four months later. AMA and DASH scores were calculated for each visit and standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated to indicate responsiveness. Correlation between impairment and disability was assessed at discharge and follow-up and scores were examined for ability to discriminate between casualties returned to duty (RTD) and casualties not returned to duty (N-RTD). Both outcome instruments revealed a statistically significant change in scores between visits (p < 0.001) with corresponding SRM indexes greater than 0.8 (large effect). There was a moderate correlation (r = 0.50) between impairment and disability at discharge and a moderately high correlation (r = 0.74) at follow-up. Both AMA and DASH scores clearly discriminated between casualties RTD (AMA 10 ± 10 and DASH 12 ± 12) and casualties N-RTD (AMA 39 ± 19 and DASH 41 ± 17) with improved accuracy at follow-up visit. The AMA and DASH can provide a comprehensive assessment of impairment and disability and may be used to detect changes in patient health status over time while clearly discriminating between RTD and N-RTD in combat casualties recovering from burn injury to the hand(s).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)150-159
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Hand Therapy
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2008

Fingerprint

Burns
American Medical Association
Hand
Arm
Hand Injuries
Disability Evaluation
Health Status

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Chapman, T. T., Richard, R. L., Hedman, T. L., Renz, E. M., Wolf, S. E., & Holcomb, J. B. (2008). Combat Casualty Hand Burns: Evaluating Impairment and Disability during Recovery. Journal of Hand Therapy, 21(2), 150-159. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2007.12.003

Combat Casualty Hand Burns : Evaluating Impairment and Disability during Recovery. / Chapman, Ted T.; Richard, Reg L.; Hedman, Travis L.; Renz, Evan M.; Wolf, Steve E.; Holcomb, John B.

In: Journal of Hand Therapy, Vol. 21, No. 2, 04.2008, p. 150-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chapman, TT, Richard, RL, Hedman, TL, Renz, EM, Wolf, SE & Holcomb, JB 2008, 'Combat Casualty Hand Burns: Evaluating Impairment and Disability during Recovery', Journal of Hand Therapy, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 150-159. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2007.12.003
Chapman, Ted T. ; Richard, Reg L. ; Hedman, Travis L. ; Renz, Evan M. ; Wolf, Steve E. ; Holcomb, John B. / Combat Casualty Hand Burns : Evaluating Impairment and Disability during Recovery. In: Journal of Hand Therapy. 2008 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 150-159.
@article{3f0d5c903d5e4b9080c10e7f8bf7a855,
title = "Combat Casualty Hand Burns: Evaluating Impairment and Disability during Recovery",
abstract = "This study evaluated the use of the American Medical Association (AMA) impairment guides and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire in U.S. military casualties recovering from burn injury to the hand. Study sample included patients with burns to at least one hand and complete evaluations of impairment and disability upon discharge from the hospital and at a follow-up visit less than four months later. AMA and DASH scores were calculated for each visit and standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated to indicate responsiveness. Correlation between impairment and disability was assessed at discharge and follow-up and scores were examined for ability to discriminate between casualties returned to duty (RTD) and casualties not returned to duty (N-RTD). Both outcome instruments revealed a statistically significant change in scores between visits (p < 0.001) with corresponding SRM indexes greater than 0.8 (large effect). There was a moderate correlation (r = 0.50) between impairment and disability at discharge and a moderately high correlation (r = 0.74) at follow-up. Both AMA and DASH scores clearly discriminated between casualties RTD (AMA 10 ± 10 and DASH 12 ± 12) and casualties N-RTD (AMA 39 ± 19 and DASH 41 ± 17) with improved accuracy at follow-up visit. The AMA and DASH can provide a comprehensive assessment of impairment and disability and may be used to detect changes in patient health status over time while clearly discriminating between RTD and N-RTD in combat casualties recovering from burn injury to the hand(s).",
author = "Chapman, {Ted T.} and Richard, {Reg L.} and Hedman, {Travis L.} and Renz, {Evan M.} and Wolf, {Steve E.} and Holcomb, {John B.}",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1197/j.jht.2007.12.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "150--159",
journal = "Journal of Hand Therapy",
issn = "0894-1130",
publisher = "Hanley and Belfus Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Combat Casualty Hand Burns

T2 - Evaluating Impairment and Disability during Recovery

AU - Chapman, Ted T.

AU - Richard, Reg L.

AU - Hedman, Travis L.

AU - Renz, Evan M.

AU - Wolf, Steve E.

AU - Holcomb, John B.

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - This study evaluated the use of the American Medical Association (AMA) impairment guides and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire in U.S. military casualties recovering from burn injury to the hand. Study sample included patients with burns to at least one hand and complete evaluations of impairment and disability upon discharge from the hospital and at a follow-up visit less than four months later. AMA and DASH scores were calculated for each visit and standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated to indicate responsiveness. Correlation between impairment and disability was assessed at discharge and follow-up and scores were examined for ability to discriminate between casualties returned to duty (RTD) and casualties not returned to duty (N-RTD). Both outcome instruments revealed a statistically significant change in scores between visits (p < 0.001) with corresponding SRM indexes greater than 0.8 (large effect). There was a moderate correlation (r = 0.50) between impairment and disability at discharge and a moderately high correlation (r = 0.74) at follow-up. Both AMA and DASH scores clearly discriminated between casualties RTD (AMA 10 ± 10 and DASH 12 ± 12) and casualties N-RTD (AMA 39 ± 19 and DASH 41 ± 17) with improved accuracy at follow-up visit. The AMA and DASH can provide a comprehensive assessment of impairment and disability and may be used to detect changes in patient health status over time while clearly discriminating between RTD and N-RTD in combat casualties recovering from burn injury to the hand(s).

AB - This study evaluated the use of the American Medical Association (AMA) impairment guides and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire in U.S. military casualties recovering from burn injury to the hand. Study sample included patients with burns to at least one hand and complete evaluations of impairment and disability upon discharge from the hospital and at a follow-up visit less than four months later. AMA and DASH scores were calculated for each visit and standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated to indicate responsiveness. Correlation between impairment and disability was assessed at discharge and follow-up and scores were examined for ability to discriminate between casualties returned to duty (RTD) and casualties not returned to duty (N-RTD). Both outcome instruments revealed a statistically significant change in scores between visits (p < 0.001) with corresponding SRM indexes greater than 0.8 (large effect). There was a moderate correlation (r = 0.50) between impairment and disability at discharge and a moderately high correlation (r = 0.74) at follow-up. Both AMA and DASH scores clearly discriminated between casualties RTD (AMA 10 ± 10 and DASH 12 ± 12) and casualties N-RTD (AMA 39 ± 19 and DASH 41 ± 17) with improved accuracy at follow-up visit. The AMA and DASH can provide a comprehensive assessment of impairment and disability and may be used to detect changes in patient health status over time while clearly discriminating between RTD and N-RTD in combat casualties recovering from burn injury to the hand(s).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43049131109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43049131109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/j.jht.2007.12.003

DO - 10.1197/j.jht.2007.12.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 18436137

AN - SCOPUS:43049131109

VL - 21

SP - 150

EP - 159

JO - Journal of Hand Therapy

JF - Journal of Hand Therapy

SN - 0894-1130

IS - 2

ER -