Awake craniotomy and memory induction through electrical stimulation: Why are Penfield’s findings not replicated in the modern era?

Nimay J. Kulkarni; Bradley C. Lega

doi:10.1093/neuros/nyaa122

Awake craniotomy and memory induction through electrical stimulation: Why are Penfield’s findings not replicated in the modern era?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	E138-E139
Journal	Neurosurgery
Volume	87
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyaa122
State	Published - Aug 1 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Surgery
Clinical Neurology

Access to Document

10.1093/neuros/nyaa122

Cite this

@article{07f10716e45540269a8098a310fd5baf,

title = "Awake craniotomy and memory induction through electrical stimulation: Why are Penfield{\textquoteright}s findings not replicated in the modern era?",

author = "Kulkarni, {Nimay J.} and Lega, {Bradley C.}",

year = "2020",

month = aug,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1093/neuros/nyaa122",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "87",

pages = "E138--E139",

journal = "Neurosurgery",

issn = "0148-396X",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Awake craniotomy and memory induction through electrical stimulation

T2 - Why are Penfield’s findings not replicated in the modern era?

AU - Kulkarni, Nimay J.

AU - Lega, Bradley C.

PY - 2020/8/1

Y1 - 2020/8/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088494899&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85088494899&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/neuros/nyaa122

DO - 10.1093/neuros/nyaa122

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 32348486

AN - SCOPUS:85088494899

SN - 0148-396X

VL - 87

SP - E138-E139

JO - Neurosurgery

JF - Neurosurgery

IS - 2

ER -

Awake craniotomy and memory induction through electrical stimulation: Why are Penfield’s findings not replicated in the modern era?

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this