Comparison of 26-gauge Atraucan® and 25-gauge Whitacre needles: insertion characteristics and complications

S. K. Sharma, D. R. Gambling, G. P. Joshi, J. E. Sidawi, E. R. Herrera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ninety-six women undergoing post-partum tubal ligation under spinal anaesthesia were studied to compare 26G Atraucan® with 25G Whitacre spinal needles for ease of insertion, number of attempts at needle insertion, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow characteristics through the needles, quality of subsequent analgesia, and incidence of perioperative complications. A higher rale of successful durai puncture at the first attempt (40/50 vs 27/46, P < 0.05) and faster (mean ± SD, 11.5 ± 2.2 vs 13.5 ± 2.4, P < 0.001) CSF flow through the needle was achieved with the Atraucan® than with the Whitacre needle. The incidence of failed spinal (4% vs 5%) and post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) (4% vs 4.3%) was similar with both needles, but more patients experienced paraesthesiae during needle insertion with the Whitacre than with the Atraucan® needle (15% vs 2%, P < 0.05). We conclude that the use of the 26G Atraucan® needle is associated with a higher rate of successful identification of the subarachnoid space at the first attempt, faster CSF backflow, and fewer paraesthesia when compared with the 25G Whitacre needle.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)706-710
Number of pages5
JournalCanadian Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume42
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1995

Fingerprint

Needles
Cerebrospinal Fluid
Paresthesia
Post-Dural Puncture Headache
Tubal Sterilization
Subarachnoid Space
Spinal Anesthesia
Incidence
Respiratory Sounds
Punctures
Analgesia

Keywords

  • anaesthetic technique: spinal
  • complications: headache, paraesthesia
  • equipment: spinal needles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Comparison of 26-gauge Atraucan® and 25-gauge Whitacre needles : insertion characteristics and complications. / Sharma, S. K.; Gambling, D. R.; Joshi, G. P.; Sidawi, J. E.; Herrera, E. R.

In: Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol. 42, No. 8, 08.1995, p. 706-710.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sharma, S. K. ; Gambling, D. R. ; Joshi, G. P. ; Sidawi, J. E. ; Herrera, E. R. / Comparison of 26-gauge Atraucan® and 25-gauge Whitacre needles : insertion characteristics and complications. In: Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 1995 ; Vol. 42, No. 8. pp. 706-710.
@article{113e267f266943379601ca235a5e7d90,
title = "Comparison of 26-gauge Atraucan{\circledR} and 25-gauge Whitacre needles: insertion characteristics and complications",
abstract = "Ninety-six women undergoing post-partum tubal ligation under spinal anaesthesia were studied to compare 26G Atraucan{\circledR} with 25G Whitacre spinal needles for ease of insertion, number of attempts at needle insertion, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow characteristics through the needles, quality of subsequent analgesia, and incidence of perioperative complications. A higher rale of successful durai puncture at the first attempt (40/50 vs 27/46, P < 0.05) and faster (mean ± SD, 11.5 ± 2.2 vs 13.5 ± 2.4, P < 0.001) CSF flow through the needle was achieved with the Atraucan{\circledR} than with the Whitacre needle. The incidence of failed spinal (4{\%} vs 5{\%}) and post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) (4{\%} vs 4.3{\%}) was similar with both needles, but more patients experienced paraesthesiae during needle insertion with the Whitacre than with the Atraucan{\circledR} needle (15{\%} vs 2{\%}, P < 0.05). We conclude that the use of the 26G Atraucan{\circledR} needle is associated with a higher rate of successful identification of the subarachnoid space at the first attempt, faster CSF backflow, and fewer paraesthesia when compared with the 25G Whitacre needle.",
keywords = "anaesthetic technique: spinal, complications: headache, paraesthesia, equipment: spinal needles",
author = "Sharma, {S. K.} and Gambling, {D. R.} and Joshi, {G. P.} and Sidawi, {J. E.} and Herrera, {E. R.}",
year = "1995",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/BF03012669",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "706--710",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Anesthesia",
issn = "0832-610X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of 26-gauge Atraucan® and 25-gauge Whitacre needles

T2 - insertion characteristics and complications

AU - Sharma, S. K.

AU - Gambling, D. R.

AU - Joshi, G. P.

AU - Sidawi, J. E.

AU - Herrera, E. R.

PY - 1995/8

Y1 - 1995/8

N2 - Ninety-six women undergoing post-partum tubal ligation under spinal anaesthesia were studied to compare 26G Atraucan® with 25G Whitacre spinal needles for ease of insertion, number of attempts at needle insertion, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow characteristics through the needles, quality of subsequent analgesia, and incidence of perioperative complications. A higher rale of successful durai puncture at the first attempt (40/50 vs 27/46, P < 0.05) and faster (mean ± SD, 11.5 ± 2.2 vs 13.5 ± 2.4, P < 0.001) CSF flow through the needle was achieved with the Atraucan® than with the Whitacre needle. The incidence of failed spinal (4% vs 5%) and post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) (4% vs 4.3%) was similar with both needles, but more patients experienced paraesthesiae during needle insertion with the Whitacre than with the Atraucan® needle (15% vs 2%, P < 0.05). We conclude that the use of the 26G Atraucan® needle is associated with a higher rate of successful identification of the subarachnoid space at the first attempt, faster CSF backflow, and fewer paraesthesia when compared with the 25G Whitacre needle.

AB - Ninety-six women undergoing post-partum tubal ligation under spinal anaesthesia were studied to compare 26G Atraucan® with 25G Whitacre spinal needles for ease of insertion, number of attempts at needle insertion, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow characteristics through the needles, quality of subsequent analgesia, and incidence of perioperative complications. A higher rale of successful durai puncture at the first attempt (40/50 vs 27/46, P < 0.05) and faster (mean ± SD, 11.5 ± 2.2 vs 13.5 ± 2.4, P < 0.001) CSF flow through the needle was achieved with the Atraucan® than with the Whitacre needle. The incidence of failed spinal (4% vs 5%) and post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) (4% vs 4.3%) was similar with both needles, but more patients experienced paraesthesiae during needle insertion with the Whitacre than with the Atraucan® needle (15% vs 2%, P < 0.05). We conclude that the use of the 26G Atraucan® needle is associated with a higher rate of successful identification of the subarachnoid space at the first attempt, faster CSF backflow, and fewer paraesthesia when compared with the 25G Whitacre needle.

KW - anaesthetic technique: spinal

KW - complications: headache, paraesthesia

KW - equipment: spinal needles

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029146359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029146359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF03012669

DO - 10.1007/BF03012669

M3 - Article

C2 - 7586110

AN - SCOPUS:0029146359

VL - 42

SP - 706

EP - 710

JO - Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

JF - Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

SN - 0832-610X

IS - 8

ER -