Comparison of basic elements of human performance scores between urologists with various extents of experience

Elspeth M. McDougall, Federico A. Corica, David S. Chou, Carlos A. Uribe, Corollos S. Abdelshehid, John R. Boker, Sepi S. Khonsari, Lou Eichel, David Lee, David S. Finley, Deborah Hogg, Jeffrey A Cadeddu, Margaret S Pearle, Ralph V. Clayman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose: An objective evaluation of innate ability and its ability to predict potential success as a surgical trainee is an appealing concept for the selection process of residency applications. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether basic elements of performance (BEP) could discriminate among resident applicants and urologists with various extents of surgical experience. Subjects and Methods: One hundred forty-five participants were divided into four study groups: group A, 57 urology residency applicants to the 2002 and 2003 interview process; group B, 8 post-internship urology residents; group C, 19 urologists tested with BEP within 10 years of graduation from their residency training program; and group D, 61 urologists who had graduated from their residency training program more than 10 years prior to testing. The BEP measures consisted of 13 basic performance resources (BPR) including visual-information processing speed, visual-spatial immediate-recall capacity, and neuromotor channel capacity. Results: The four study groups differed significantly in their mean age: group A = 27.6 years, group B = 29.1 years, group C = 37.1 years, and group D = 48.9 years (P < 0.0005). There was essentially no significant difference between the groups with regard to immediate-recall memory, reaction time simple, or reaction time complicated. The younger participants (groups A and B) were faster than the older surgeons (groups C and D) (P < 0.02). However, the older surgeons (groups C and D) were significantly more accurate than the younger groups (A and B) (P < 0.0005). The only sex differences noted were in hand-grip strength and shoulder-strength scores, which were all higher in the men. Conclusions: There generally appears to be a lack of direct correlation between innate abilities and surgical experience. Urology resident applicants with no surgical experience and urology residents with limited surgical experience are faster but less accurate in innate skills testing than experienced practicing urologists.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)209-214
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2006

Fingerprint

Internship and Residency
Urology
Aptitude
Short-Term Memory
Hand Strength
Reaction Time
Education
Automatic Data Processing
Sex Characteristics
Age Groups
Urologists
Interviews
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

McDougall, E. M., Corica, F. A., Chou, D. S., Uribe, C. A., Abdelshehid, C. S., Boker, J. R., ... Clayman, R. V. (2006). Comparison of basic elements of human performance scores between urologists with various extents of experience. Journal of Endourology, 20(3), 209-214. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2006.20.209

Comparison of basic elements of human performance scores between urologists with various extents of experience. / McDougall, Elspeth M.; Corica, Federico A.; Chou, David S.; Uribe, Carlos A.; Abdelshehid, Corollos S.; Boker, John R.; Khonsari, Sepi S.; Eichel, Lou; Lee, David; Finley, David S.; Hogg, Deborah; Cadeddu, Jeffrey A; Pearle, Margaret S; Clayman, Ralph V.

In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 20, No. 3, 03.2006, p. 209-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McDougall, EM, Corica, FA, Chou, DS, Uribe, CA, Abdelshehid, CS, Boker, JR, Khonsari, SS, Eichel, L, Lee, D, Finley, DS, Hogg, D, Cadeddu, JA, Pearle, MS & Clayman, RV 2006, 'Comparison of basic elements of human performance scores between urologists with various extents of experience', Journal of Endourology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 209-214. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2006.20.209
McDougall, Elspeth M. ; Corica, Federico A. ; Chou, David S. ; Uribe, Carlos A. ; Abdelshehid, Corollos S. ; Boker, John R. ; Khonsari, Sepi S. ; Eichel, Lou ; Lee, David ; Finley, David S. ; Hogg, Deborah ; Cadeddu, Jeffrey A ; Pearle, Margaret S ; Clayman, Ralph V. / Comparison of basic elements of human performance scores between urologists with various extents of experience. In: Journal of Endourology. 2006 ; Vol. 20, No. 3. pp. 209-214.
@article{ddd19d6bfc9a4384ba603e0429511c61,
title = "Comparison of basic elements of human performance scores between urologists with various extents of experience",
abstract = "Background and Purpose: An objective evaluation of innate ability and its ability to predict potential success as a surgical trainee is an appealing concept for the selection process of residency applications. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether basic elements of performance (BEP) could discriminate among resident applicants and urologists with various extents of surgical experience. Subjects and Methods: One hundred forty-five participants were divided into four study groups: group A, 57 urology residency applicants to the 2002 and 2003 interview process; group B, 8 post-internship urology residents; group C, 19 urologists tested with BEP within 10 years of graduation from their residency training program; and group D, 61 urologists who had graduated from their residency training program more than 10 years prior to testing. The BEP measures consisted of 13 basic performance resources (BPR) including visual-information processing speed, visual-spatial immediate-recall capacity, and neuromotor channel capacity. Results: The four study groups differed significantly in their mean age: group A = 27.6 years, group B = 29.1 years, group C = 37.1 years, and group D = 48.9 years (P < 0.0005). There was essentially no significant difference between the groups with regard to immediate-recall memory, reaction time simple, or reaction time complicated. The younger participants (groups A and B) were faster than the older surgeons (groups C and D) (P < 0.02). However, the older surgeons (groups C and D) were significantly more accurate than the younger groups (A and B) (P < 0.0005). The only sex differences noted were in hand-grip strength and shoulder-strength scores, which were all higher in the men. Conclusions: There generally appears to be a lack of direct correlation between innate abilities and surgical experience. Urology resident applicants with no surgical experience and urology residents with limited surgical experience are faster but less accurate in innate skills testing than experienced practicing urologists.",
author = "McDougall, {Elspeth M.} and Corica, {Federico A.} and Chou, {David S.} and Uribe, {Carlos A.} and Abdelshehid, {Corollos S.} and Boker, {John R.} and Khonsari, {Sepi S.} and Lou Eichel and David Lee and Finley, {David S.} and Deborah Hogg and Cadeddu, {Jeffrey A} and Pearle, {Margaret S} and Clayman, {Ralph V.}",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1089/end.2006.20.209",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "209--214",
journal = "Journal of Endourology",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of basic elements of human performance scores between urologists with various extents of experience

AU - McDougall, Elspeth M.

AU - Corica, Federico A.

AU - Chou, David S.

AU - Uribe, Carlos A.

AU - Abdelshehid, Corollos S.

AU - Boker, John R.

AU - Khonsari, Sepi S.

AU - Eichel, Lou

AU - Lee, David

AU - Finley, David S.

AU - Hogg, Deborah

AU - Cadeddu, Jeffrey A

AU - Pearle, Margaret S

AU - Clayman, Ralph V.

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - Background and Purpose: An objective evaluation of innate ability and its ability to predict potential success as a surgical trainee is an appealing concept for the selection process of residency applications. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether basic elements of performance (BEP) could discriminate among resident applicants and urologists with various extents of surgical experience. Subjects and Methods: One hundred forty-five participants were divided into four study groups: group A, 57 urology residency applicants to the 2002 and 2003 interview process; group B, 8 post-internship urology residents; group C, 19 urologists tested with BEP within 10 years of graduation from their residency training program; and group D, 61 urologists who had graduated from their residency training program more than 10 years prior to testing. The BEP measures consisted of 13 basic performance resources (BPR) including visual-information processing speed, visual-spatial immediate-recall capacity, and neuromotor channel capacity. Results: The four study groups differed significantly in their mean age: group A = 27.6 years, group B = 29.1 years, group C = 37.1 years, and group D = 48.9 years (P < 0.0005). There was essentially no significant difference between the groups with regard to immediate-recall memory, reaction time simple, or reaction time complicated. The younger participants (groups A and B) were faster than the older surgeons (groups C and D) (P < 0.02). However, the older surgeons (groups C and D) were significantly more accurate than the younger groups (A and B) (P < 0.0005). The only sex differences noted were in hand-grip strength and shoulder-strength scores, which were all higher in the men. Conclusions: There generally appears to be a lack of direct correlation between innate abilities and surgical experience. Urology resident applicants with no surgical experience and urology residents with limited surgical experience are faster but less accurate in innate skills testing than experienced practicing urologists.

AB - Background and Purpose: An objective evaluation of innate ability and its ability to predict potential success as a surgical trainee is an appealing concept for the selection process of residency applications. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether basic elements of performance (BEP) could discriminate among resident applicants and urologists with various extents of surgical experience. Subjects and Methods: One hundred forty-five participants were divided into four study groups: group A, 57 urology residency applicants to the 2002 and 2003 interview process; group B, 8 post-internship urology residents; group C, 19 urologists tested with BEP within 10 years of graduation from their residency training program; and group D, 61 urologists who had graduated from their residency training program more than 10 years prior to testing. The BEP measures consisted of 13 basic performance resources (BPR) including visual-information processing speed, visual-spatial immediate-recall capacity, and neuromotor channel capacity. Results: The four study groups differed significantly in their mean age: group A = 27.6 years, group B = 29.1 years, group C = 37.1 years, and group D = 48.9 years (P < 0.0005). There was essentially no significant difference between the groups with regard to immediate-recall memory, reaction time simple, or reaction time complicated. The younger participants (groups A and B) were faster than the older surgeons (groups C and D) (P < 0.02). However, the older surgeons (groups C and D) were significantly more accurate than the younger groups (A and B) (P < 0.0005). The only sex differences noted were in hand-grip strength and shoulder-strength scores, which were all higher in the men. Conclusions: There generally appears to be a lack of direct correlation between innate abilities and surgical experience. Urology resident applicants with no surgical experience and urology residents with limited surgical experience are faster but less accurate in innate skills testing than experienced practicing urologists.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646094700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646094700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/end.2006.20.209

DO - 10.1089/end.2006.20.209

M3 - Article

C2 - 16548732

AN - SCOPUS:33646094700

VL - 20

SP - 209

EP - 214

JO - Journal of Endourology

JF - Journal of Endourology

SN - 0892-7790

IS - 3

ER -