Comparison of cocurrent and countercurrent flow-related enhancement in MR imaging

A. R. Whittemore, W. G. Bradley, J. R. Jinkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Patterns of flow-related signal loss and enhancement have been observed in fluid moving perpendicular to the imaging plane on multisection-acquisition magnetic resonance images. These patterns depend on whether the flow is in the same direction (cocurrent) or opposite (countercurrent) to the direction of sequential section excitation. For a given velocity, flow-related enhancement penetrates deeper into the imaging volume with countercurrent flow than with cocurrent flow. The signal intensity of inner sections is generally greater with countercurrent flow than with cocurrent flow and depends on the velocity. These effects were investigated quantitatively with phantom studies and correlated with theoretical predictions. It was found that the limited penetration of flow-related enhancement with cocurrent flow is a consequence of recently saturated upstream protons flowing into the section to be excited. The flow-related enhancement penetrates further with countercurrent flow, because inflowing spins have had a greater period of time to recover from the saturating effect of the radio-frequency pulse. Because different laminae have different time intervals to recover magnetization, this also accounts for the observation of concentric rings representing laminar flow in the countercurrent direction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)265-271
Number of pages7
JournalRadiology
Volume170
Issue number1 I
StatePublished - 1989

Fingerprint

Radio
Protons
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Observation
Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Comparison of cocurrent and countercurrent flow-related enhancement in MR imaging. / Whittemore, A. R.; Bradley, W. G.; Jinkins, J. R.

In: Radiology, Vol. 170, No. 1 I, 1989, p. 265-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Whittemore, AR, Bradley, WG & Jinkins, JR 1989, 'Comparison of cocurrent and countercurrent flow-related enhancement in MR imaging', Radiology, vol. 170, no. 1 I, pp. 265-271.
Whittemore, A. R. ; Bradley, W. G. ; Jinkins, J. R. / Comparison of cocurrent and countercurrent flow-related enhancement in MR imaging. In: Radiology. 1989 ; Vol. 170, No. 1 I. pp. 265-271.
@article{200554a1990a4a40bd97f0837794a6cb,
title = "Comparison of cocurrent and countercurrent flow-related enhancement in MR imaging",
abstract = "Patterns of flow-related signal loss and enhancement have been observed in fluid moving perpendicular to the imaging plane on multisection-acquisition magnetic resonance images. These patterns depend on whether the flow is in the same direction (cocurrent) or opposite (countercurrent) to the direction of sequential section excitation. For a given velocity, flow-related enhancement penetrates deeper into the imaging volume with countercurrent flow than with cocurrent flow. The signal intensity of inner sections is generally greater with countercurrent flow than with cocurrent flow and depends on the velocity. These effects were investigated quantitatively with phantom studies and correlated with theoretical predictions. It was found that the limited penetration of flow-related enhancement with cocurrent flow is a consequence of recently saturated upstream protons flowing into the section to be excited. The flow-related enhancement penetrates further with countercurrent flow, because inflowing spins have had a greater period of time to recover from the saturating effect of the radio-frequency pulse. Because different laminae have different time intervals to recover magnetization, this also accounts for the observation of concentric rings representing laminar flow in the countercurrent direction.",
author = "Whittemore, {A. R.} and Bradley, {W. G.} and Jinkins, {J. R.}",
year = "1989",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "170",
pages = "265--271",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "1 I",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of cocurrent and countercurrent flow-related enhancement in MR imaging

AU - Whittemore, A. R.

AU - Bradley, W. G.

AU - Jinkins, J. R.

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - Patterns of flow-related signal loss and enhancement have been observed in fluid moving perpendicular to the imaging plane on multisection-acquisition magnetic resonance images. These patterns depend on whether the flow is in the same direction (cocurrent) or opposite (countercurrent) to the direction of sequential section excitation. For a given velocity, flow-related enhancement penetrates deeper into the imaging volume with countercurrent flow than with cocurrent flow. The signal intensity of inner sections is generally greater with countercurrent flow than with cocurrent flow and depends on the velocity. These effects were investigated quantitatively with phantom studies and correlated with theoretical predictions. It was found that the limited penetration of flow-related enhancement with cocurrent flow is a consequence of recently saturated upstream protons flowing into the section to be excited. The flow-related enhancement penetrates further with countercurrent flow, because inflowing spins have had a greater period of time to recover from the saturating effect of the radio-frequency pulse. Because different laminae have different time intervals to recover magnetization, this also accounts for the observation of concentric rings representing laminar flow in the countercurrent direction.

AB - Patterns of flow-related signal loss and enhancement have been observed in fluid moving perpendicular to the imaging plane on multisection-acquisition magnetic resonance images. These patterns depend on whether the flow is in the same direction (cocurrent) or opposite (countercurrent) to the direction of sequential section excitation. For a given velocity, flow-related enhancement penetrates deeper into the imaging volume with countercurrent flow than with cocurrent flow. The signal intensity of inner sections is generally greater with countercurrent flow than with cocurrent flow and depends on the velocity. These effects were investigated quantitatively with phantom studies and correlated with theoretical predictions. It was found that the limited penetration of flow-related enhancement with cocurrent flow is a consequence of recently saturated upstream protons flowing into the section to be excited. The flow-related enhancement penetrates further with countercurrent flow, because inflowing spins have had a greater period of time to recover from the saturating effect of the radio-frequency pulse. Because different laminae have different time intervals to recover magnetization, this also accounts for the observation of concentric rings representing laminar flow in the countercurrent direction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024585060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024585060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2909107

AN - SCOPUS:0024585060

VL - 170

SP - 265

EP - 271

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 1 I

ER -