Comparison of gait after syme and transtibial amputation in children: Factors that may play a role in function

Kelly A. Jeans, Lori A. Karol, Donald Cummings, Kunal Singhal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Results: Kinematic differences of <4 in total prosthetic ankle motion and 8 in external hip rotation were seen between the Syme and transtibial groups. Ankle power was greater in the transtibial group, whereas the Syme group had greater coronal-plane hip power (p < 0.05). Prosthetic ankle motion was significantly greater in the high compared with the medium and low-performance feet. However, the PODCI happiness score was higher in patients with low compared with medium-performance feet (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Small differences in prosthetic ankle motion and power were found between children with Syme and transtibial amputations. Ankle motion was greater in patients using high-performance feet (9% of the total cohort) compared with medium-performance (59%) and low-performance (31%) feet. Despite the increased ankle motion achieved with high-performance dynamic feet, this advantage was not reflected in peak power of the prosthetic ankle or the PODCI sports/physical functioning subscale.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Preservation of maximal limb length during amputation is often recommended to maximize the efficiency and symmetry of gait. The goals of this study were to determine (1) whether there are gait differences between children with a Syme (or Boyd) amputation and those with a transtibial-level amputation, and (2) whether the type of prosthetic foot affects gait and PODCI (Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument) outcomes.

Methods: Sixty-four patients (age range, 4.7 to 19.2 years) with unilateral below-the-knee prosthesis use (forty-one in the Syme group and twenty-three in the transtibial group) underwent gait analysis and review of data for the involved limb. The twelve prosthetic foot types were categorized as designed for a high, medium, or low activity level (e.g., Flex foot, dynamic response foot, or SACH). Statistical analyses were conducted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1641-1647
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume
Volume96
Issue number19
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2014

Fingerprint

Gait
Amputation
Foot
Ankle
Pediatrics
Hip
Extremities
Knee Prosthesis
Happiness
Biomechanical Phenomena
Sports
Power (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Comparison of gait after syme and transtibial amputation in children : Factors that may play a role in function. / Jeans, Kelly A.; Karol, Lori A.; Cummings, Donald; Singhal, Kunal.

In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume, Vol. 96, No. 19, 01.10.2014, p. 1641-1647.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5d2353abc884459d928c9471e356a83a,
title = "Comparison of gait after syme and transtibial amputation in children: Factors that may play a role in function",
abstract = "Results: Kinematic differences of <4 in total prosthetic ankle motion and 8 in external hip rotation were seen between the Syme and transtibial groups. Ankle power was greater in the transtibial group, whereas the Syme group had greater coronal-plane hip power (p < 0.05). Prosthetic ankle motion was significantly greater in the high compared with the medium and low-performance feet. However, the PODCI happiness score was higher in patients with low compared with medium-performance feet (p < 0.05).Conclusions: Small differences in prosthetic ankle motion and power were found between children with Syme and transtibial amputations. Ankle motion was greater in patients using high-performance feet (9{\%} of the total cohort) compared with medium-performance (59{\%}) and low-performance (31{\%}) feet. Despite the increased ankle motion achieved with high-performance dynamic feet, this advantage was not reflected in peak power of the prosthetic ankle or the PODCI sports/physical functioning subscale.Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.Background: Preservation of maximal limb length during amputation is often recommended to maximize the efficiency and symmetry of gait. The goals of this study were to determine (1) whether there are gait differences between children with a Syme (or Boyd) amputation and those with a transtibial-level amputation, and (2) whether the type of prosthetic foot affects gait and PODCI (Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument) outcomes.Methods: Sixty-four patients (age range, 4.7 to 19.2 years) with unilateral below-the-knee prosthesis use (forty-one in the Syme group and twenty-three in the transtibial group) underwent gait analysis and review of data for the involved limb. The twelve prosthetic foot types were categorized as designed for a high, medium, or low activity level (e.g., Flex foot, dynamic response foot, or SACH). Statistical analyses were conducted.",
author = "Jeans, {Kelly A.} and Karol, {Lori A.} and Donald Cummings and Kunal Singhal",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2106/JBJS.N.00192",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96",
pages = "1641--1647",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume",
issn = "0021-9355",
publisher = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Inc.",
number = "19",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of gait after syme and transtibial amputation in children

T2 - Factors that may play a role in function

AU - Jeans, Kelly A.

AU - Karol, Lori A.

AU - Cummings, Donald

AU - Singhal, Kunal

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - Results: Kinematic differences of <4 in total prosthetic ankle motion and 8 in external hip rotation were seen between the Syme and transtibial groups. Ankle power was greater in the transtibial group, whereas the Syme group had greater coronal-plane hip power (p < 0.05). Prosthetic ankle motion was significantly greater in the high compared with the medium and low-performance feet. However, the PODCI happiness score was higher in patients with low compared with medium-performance feet (p < 0.05).Conclusions: Small differences in prosthetic ankle motion and power were found between children with Syme and transtibial amputations. Ankle motion was greater in patients using high-performance feet (9% of the total cohort) compared with medium-performance (59%) and low-performance (31%) feet. Despite the increased ankle motion achieved with high-performance dynamic feet, this advantage was not reflected in peak power of the prosthetic ankle or the PODCI sports/physical functioning subscale.Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.Background: Preservation of maximal limb length during amputation is often recommended to maximize the efficiency and symmetry of gait. The goals of this study were to determine (1) whether there are gait differences between children with a Syme (or Boyd) amputation and those with a transtibial-level amputation, and (2) whether the type of prosthetic foot affects gait and PODCI (Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument) outcomes.Methods: Sixty-four patients (age range, 4.7 to 19.2 years) with unilateral below-the-knee prosthesis use (forty-one in the Syme group and twenty-three in the transtibial group) underwent gait analysis and review of data for the involved limb. The twelve prosthetic foot types were categorized as designed for a high, medium, or low activity level (e.g., Flex foot, dynamic response foot, or SACH). Statistical analyses were conducted.

AB - Results: Kinematic differences of <4 in total prosthetic ankle motion and 8 in external hip rotation were seen between the Syme and transtibial groups. Ankle power was greater in the transtibial group, whereas the Syme group had greater coronal-plane hip power (p < 0.05). Prosthetic ankle motion was significantly greater in the high compared with the medium and low-performance feet. However, the PODCI happiness score was higher in patients with low compared with medium-performance feet (p < 0.05).Conclusions: Small differences in prosthetic ankle motion and power were found between children with Syme and transtibial amputations. Ankle motion was greater in patients using high-performance feet (9% of the total cohort) compared with medium-performance (59%) and low-performance (31%) feet. Despite the increased ankle motion achieved with high-performance dynamic feet, this advantage was not reflected in peak power of the prosthetic ankle or the PODCI sports/physical functioning subscale.Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.Background: Preservation of maximal limb length during amputation is often recommended to maximize the efficiency and symmetry of gait. The goals of this study were to determine (1) whether there are gait differences between children with a Syme (or Boyd) amputation and those with a transtibial-level amputation, and (2) whether the type of prosthetic foot affects gait and PODCI (Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument) outcomes.Methods: Sixty-four patients (age range, 4.7 to 19.2 years) with unilateral below-the-knee prosthesis use (forty-one in the Syme group and twenty-three in the transtibial group) underwent gait analysis and review of data for the involved limb. The twelve prosthetic foot types were categorized as designed for a high, medium, or low activity level (e.g., Flex foot, dynamic response foot, or SACH). Statistical analyses were conducted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907494161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907494161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2106/JBJS.N.00192

DO - 10.2106/JBJS.N.00192

M3 - Article

C2 - 25274789

AN - SCOPUS:84907494161

VL - 96

SP - 1641

EP - 1647

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

SN - 0021-9355

IS - 19

ER -