Comparison of growing rod instrumentation versus serial cast treatment for early-onset scoliosis

Charles E. Johnston, Anna M. McClung, George H. Thompson, Connie Poe-Kochert, James O. Sanders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design: A comparison of 2 methods of early-onset scoliosis treatment using radiographic measures and complication rates. Objectives: To determine whether a delaying tactic (serial casting) has comparable efficacy to a surgical method (insertion of growing rod instrumentation [GRI]) in the initial phase of early-onset deformity management. Summary of Background Data: Serial casts are used in experienced centers to delay operative management of curves of surgical magnitude (greater than 50°) in children up to age 6 years. Methods: A total of 27 casted patients from 3 institutions were matched with 27 patients from a multicenter database according to age (within 6 months of each other), curve magnitude (within 10° of each other), and diagnosis. Outcomes were compared according to major curve magnitude, spine length (T1-S1), duration and number of treatment encounters, and complications. Results: There was no difference in age (5.5 years) or initial curve magnitude (65°) between groups, which reflects the accuracy of the matching process. Six pairs of patients had neuromuscular diagnoses, 11 had idiopathic deformities, and 10 had syndromic scoliosis. Growing rod instrumentation patients had smaller curves (45.9° vs. 64.9°; p =.002) at follow-up, but there was no difference in absolute spine length (GRI = 32.0 cm; cast = 30.6 cm; p =.26), even though GRI patients had been under treatment for a longer duration (4.5 vs. 2.4 years; p <.0001) and had undergone a mean of 5.5 lengthenings compared with 4.0 casts. Growing rod instrumentation patients had a 44% complication rate, compared with 1 cast complication. Of 27 casted patients, 15 eventually had operative treatment after a mean delay of 1.7 years after casting. Conclusions: Cast treatment is a valuable delaying tactic for younger children with early-onset scoliosis. Spine deformity is adequately controlled, spine length is not compromised, and surgical complications associated with early GRI treatment are avoided.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)339-342
Number of pages4
JournalSpine Deformity
Volume1
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Scoliosis
Spine
Therapeutics
Databases

Keywords

  • Early onset scoliosis
  • Growing rod surgery
  • Serial casting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Comparison of growing rod instrumentation versus serial cast treatment for early-onset scoliosis. / Johnston, Charles E.; McClung, Anna M.; Thompson, George H.; Poe-Kochert, Connie; Sanders, James O.

In: Spine Deformity, Vol. 1, No. 5, 09.2013, p. 339-342.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Johnston, Charles E. ; McClung, Anna M. ; Thompson, George H. ; Poe-Kochert, Connie ; Sanders, James O. / Comparison of growing rod instrumentation versus serial cast treatment for early-onset scoliosis. In: Spine Deformity. 2013 ; Vol. 1, No. 5. pp. 339-342.
@article{5cb196ec5f0146c5be8839d5a5cd32f8,
title = "Comparison of growing rod instrumentation versus serial cast treatment for early-onset scoliosis",
abstract = "Study Design: A comparison of 2 methods of early-onset scoliosis treatment using radiographic measures and complication rates. Objectives: To determine whether a delaying tactic (serial casting) has comparable efficacy to a surgical method (insertion of growing rod instrumentation [GRI]) in the initial phase of early-onset deformity management. Summary of Background Data: Serial casts are used in experienced centers to delay operative management of curves of surgical magnitude (greater than 50°) in children up to age 6 years. Methods: A total of 27 casted patients from 3 institutions were matched with 27 patients from a multicenter database according to age (within 6 months of each other), curve magnitude (within 10° of each other), and diagnosis. Outcomes were compared according to major curve magnitude, spine length (T1-S1), duration and number of treatment encounters, and complications. Results: There was no difference in age (5.5 years) or initial curve magnitude (65°) between groups, which reflects the accuracy of the matching process. Six pairs of patients had neuromuscular diagnoses, 11 had idiopathic deformities, and 10 had syndromic scoliosis. Growing rod instrumentation patients had smaller curves (45.9° vs. 64.9°; p =.002) at follow-up, but there was no difference in absolute spine length (GRI = 32.0 cm; cast = 30.6 cm; p =.26), even though GRI patients had been under treatment for a longer duration (4.5 vs. 2.4 years; p <.0001) and had undergone a mean of 5.5 lengthenings compared with 4.0 casts. Growing rod instrumentation patients had a 44{\%} complication rate, compared with 1 cast complication. Of 27 casted patients, 15 eventually had operative treatment after a mean delay of 1.7 years after casting. Conclusions: Cast treatment is a valuable delaying tactic for younger children with early-onset scoliosis. Spine deformity is adequately controlled, spine length is not compromised, and surgical complications associated with early GRI treatment are avoided.",
keywords = "Early onset scoliosis, Growing rod surgery, Serial casting",
author = "Johnston, {Charles E.} and McClung, {Anna M.} and Thompson, {George H.} and Connie Poe-Kochert and Sanders, {James O.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jspd.2013.05.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "339--342",
journal = "Spine Deformity",
issn = "2212-134X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of growing rod instrumentation versus serial cast treatment for early-onset scoliosis

AU - Johnston, Charles E.

AU - McClung, Anna M.

AU - Thompson, George H.

AU - Poe-Kochert, Connie

AU - Sanders, James O.

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Study Design: A comparison of 2 methods of early-onset scoliosis treatment using radiographic measures and complication rates. Objectives: To determine whether a delaying tactic (serial casting) has comparable efficacy to a surgical method (insertion of growing rod instrumentation [GRI]) in the initial phase of early-onset deformity management. Summary of Background Data: Serial casts are used in experienced centers to delay operative management of curves of surgical magnitude (greater than 50°) in children up to age 6 years. Methods: A total of 27 casted patients from 3 institutions were matched with 27 patients from a multicenter database according to age (within 6 months of each other), curve magnitude (within 10° of each other), and diagnosis. Outcomes were compared according to major curve magnitude, spine length (T1-S1), duration and number of treatment encounters, and complications. Results: There was no difference in age (5.5 years) or initial curve magnitude (65°) between groups, which reflects the accuracy of the matching process. Six pairs of patients had neuromuscular diagnoses, 11 had idiopathic deformities, and 10 had syndromic scoliosis. Growing rod instrumentation patients had smaller curves (45.9° vs. 64.9°; p =.002) at follow-up, but there was no difference in absolute spine length (GRI = 32.0 cm; cast = 30.6 cm; p =.26), even though GRI patients had been under treatment for a longer duration (4.5 vs. 2.4 years; p <.0001) and had undergone a mean of 5.5 lengthenings compared with 4.0 casts. Growing rod instrumentation patients had a 44% complication rate, compared with 1 cast complication. Of 27 casted patients, 15 eventually had operative treatment after a mean delay of 1.7 years after casting. Conclusions: Cast treatment is a valuable delaying tactic for younger children with early-onset scoliosis. Spine deformity is adequately controlled, spine length is not compromised, and surgical complications associated with early GRI treatment are avoided.

AB - Study Design: A comparison of 2 methods of early-onset scoliosis treatment using radiographic measures and complication rates. Objectives: To determine whether a delaying tactic (serial casting) has comparable efficacy to a surgical method (insertion of growing rod instrumentation [GRI]) in the initial phase of early-onset deformity management. Summary of Background Data: Serial casts are used in experienced centers to delay operative management of curves of surgical magnitude (greater than 50°) in children up to age 6 years. Methods: A total of 27 casted patients from 3 institutions were matched with 27 patients from a multicenter database according to age (within 6 months of each other), curve magnitude (within 10° of each other), and diagnosis. Outcomes were compared according to major curve magnitude, spine length (T1-S1), duration and number of treatment encounters, and complications. Results: There was no difference in age (5.5 years) or initial curve magnitude (65°) between groups, which reflects the accuracy of the matching process. Six pairs of patients had neuromuscular diagnoses, 11 had idiopathic deformities, and 10 had syndromic scoliosis. Growing rod instrumentation patients had smaller curves (45.9° vs. 64.9°; p =.002) at follow-up, but there was no difference in absolute spine length (GRI = 32.0 cm; cast = 30.6 cm; p =.26), even though GRI patients had been under treatment for a longer duration (4.5 vs. 2.4 years; p <.0001) and had undergone a mean of 5.5 lengthenings compared with 4.0 casts. Growing rod instrumentation patients had a 44% complication rate, compared with 1 cast complication. Of 27 casted patients, 15 eventually had operative treatment after a mean delay of 1.7 years after casting. Conclusions: Cast treatment is a valuable delaying tactic for younger children with early-onset scoliosis. Spine deformity is adequately controlled, spine length is not compromised, and surgical complications associated with early GRI treatment are avoided.

KW - Early onset scoliosis

KW - Growing rod surgery

KW - Serial casting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884611352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884611352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jspd.2013.05.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jspd.2013.05.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 27927389

AN - SCOPUS:84884611352

VL - 1

SP - 339

EP - 342

JO - Spine Deformity

JF - Spine Deformity

SN - 2212-134X

IS - 5

ER -