Comparison of predicted and actual consequences of missense mutations

Lisa A. Miosge, Matthew A. Field, Yovina Sontani, Vicky Cho, Simon Johnson, Anna Palkova, Bhavani Balakishnan, Rong Liang, Yafei Zhang, Stephen Lyon, Bruce Beutler, Belinda Whittle, Edward M. Bertram, Anselm Enders, Christopher C. Goodnow, T. Daniel Andrewsa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

101 Scopus citations

Abstract

Each person's genome sequence has thousands of missense variants. Practical interpretation of their functional significance must rely on computational inferences in the absence of exhaustive experimental measurements. Here we analyzed the efficacy of these inferences in 33 de novo missense mutations revealed by sequencing in first-generation progeny of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea- treated mice, involving 23 essential immune system genes. Poly- Phen2, SIFT, MutationAssessor, Panther, CADD, and Condel were used to predict each mutation's functional importance, whereas the actual effect was measured by breeding and testing homozygotes for the expected in vivo loss-of-function phenotype. Only 20% of mutations predicted to be deleterious by PolyPhen2 (and 15% by CADD) showed a discernible phenotype in individual homozygotes. Half of all possible missense mutations in the same 23 immune genes were predicted to be deleterious, and most of these appear to become subject to purifying selection because few persist between separate mouse substrains, rodents, or primates. Because defects in immune genes could be phenotypically masked in vivo by compensation and environment, we compared inferences by the same tools with the in vitro phenotype of all 2,314 possible missense variants in TP53; 42% of mutations predicted by PolyPhen2 to be deleterious (and 45% by CADD) had little measurable consequence for TP53-promoted transcription. We conclude that for de novo or low-frequency missense mutations found by genome sequencing, half those inferred as deleterious correspond to nearly neutral mutations that have little impact on the clinical phenotype of individual cases but will nevertheless become subject to purifying selection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E5189-E5198
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume112
Issue number37
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 15 2015

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • De novo mutation
  • Evolution
  • Immunodeficiency
  • Nearly neutral

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of predicted and actual consequences of missense mutations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Miosge, L. A., Field, M. A., Sontani, Y., Cho, V., Johnson, S., Palkova, A., Balakishnan, B., Liang, R., Zhang, Y., Lyon, S., Beutler, B., Whittle, B., Bertram, E. M., Enders, A., Goodnow, C. C., & Andrewsa, T. D. (2015). Comparison of predicted and actual consequences of missense mutations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(37), E5189-E5198. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1511585112