Comparison of Robot-Assisted Versus Open Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Ankur A. Shah, Jeffrey C. Gahan, Igor Sorokin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Recent advancements in minimally invasive approaches for prostate surgery have provided numerous options for surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). In the setting of a large prostate, an open simple prostatectomy was previously considered the gold standard surgical treatment. However, the recently updated American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines on surgical management of BPH now consider both open and minimally invasive approaches to simple prostatectomy viable alternatives for treating large glands, depending on expertise with the techniques. The purpose of our review is to discuss the minimally invasive robot-assisted approach and compare it to the classic open approach to simple prostatectomy. Recent Findings: Despite longer operative times, the robotic approach is associated with shorter hospital stay and lower morbidity profile. The morbidity of an open approach remains significant. Blood transfusions are 3–4 times as likely compared to a robotic approach and major complications are twice as likely. Consistent with previous literature, our review shows functional outcome improvements like flow rate and symptom score to be comparable between the robotic and open approach. The amount of adenoma resected and PSA decline is also similar among robotic and open cases. Summary: Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy is a safe and effective procedure for BPH secondary to a large prostate gland. Appropriately, it is no longer deemed “investigational” by the latest AUA guidelines on BPH and recommended as an alternative to the open approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number71
JournalCurrent Urology Reports
Volume19
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Prostatic Hyperplasia
Robotics
Prostatectomy
Prostate
Guidelines
Morbidity
Operative Time
Blood Transfusion
Adenoma
Length of Stay
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • BPH
  • OSP
  • RASP
  • Robotic simple prostatectomy
  • Simple prostatectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Comparison of Robot-Assisted Versus Open Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. / Shah, Ankur A.; Gahan, Jeffrey C.; Sorokin, Igor.

In: Current Urology Reports, Vol. 19, No. 9, 71, 01.09.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{f4bc848f2edb4b91970e97975f54e3a7,
title = "Comparison of Robot-Assisted Versus Open Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia",
abstract = "Purpose of Review: Recent advancements in minimally invasive approaches for prostate surgery have provided numerous options for surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). In the setting of a large prostate, an open simple prostatectomy was previously considered the gold standard surgical treatment. However, the recently updated American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines on surgical management of BPH now consider both open and minimally invasive approaches to simple prostatectomy viable alternatives for treating large glands, depending on expertise with the techniques. The purpose of our review is to discuss the minimally invasive robot-assisted approach and compare it to the classic open approach to simple prostatectomy. Recent Findings: Despite longer operative times, the robotic approach is associated with shorter hospital stay and lower morbidity profile. The morbidity of an open approach remains significant. Blood transfusions are 3–4 times as likely compared to a robotic approach and major complications are twice as likely. Consistent with previous literature, our review shows functional outcome improvements like flow rate and symptom score to be comparable between the robotic and open approach. The amount of adenoma resected and PSA decline is also similar among robotic and open cases. Summary: Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy is a safe and effective procedure for BPH secondary to a large prostate gland. Appropriately, it is no longer deemed “investigational” by the latest AUA guidelines on BPH and recommended as an alternative to the open approach.",
keywords = "BPH, OSP, RASP, Robotic simple prostatectomy, Simple prostatectomy",
author = "Shah, {Ankur A.} and Gahan, {Jeffrey C.} and Igor Sorokin",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11934-018-0820-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
journal = "Current Urology Reports",
issn = "1527-2737",
publisher = "Current Science, Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Robot-Assisted Versus Open Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

AU - Shah, Ankur A.

AU - Gahan, Jeffrey C.

AU - Sorokin, Igor

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Purpose of Review: Recent advancements in minimally invasive approaches for prostate surgery have provided numerous options for surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). In the setting of a large prostate, an open simple prostatectomy was previously considered the gold standard surgical treatment. However, the recently updated American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines on surgical management of BPH now consider both open and minimally invasive approaches to simple prostatectomy viable alternatives for treating large glands, depending on expertise with the techniques. The purpose of our review is to discuss the minimally invasive robot-assisted approach and compare it to the classic open approach to simple prostatectomy. Recent Findings: Despite longer operative times, the robotic approach is associated with shorter hospital stay and lower morbidity profile. The morbidity of an open approach remains significant. Blood transfusions are 3–4 times as likely compared to a robotic approach and major complications are twice as likely. Consistent with previous literature, our review shows functional outcome improvements like flow rate and symptom score to be comparable between the robotic and open approach. The amount of adenoma resected and PSA decline is also similar among robotic and open cases. Summary: Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy is a safe and effective procedure for BPH secondary to a large prostate gland. Appropriately, it is no longer deemed “investigational” by the latest AUA guidelines on BPH and recommended as an alternative to the open approach.

AB - Purpose of Review: Recent advancements in minimally invasive approaches for prostate surgery have provided numerous options for surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). In the setting of a large prostate, an open simple prostatectomy was previously considered the gold standard surgical treatment. However, the recently updated American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines on surgical management of BPH now consider both open and minimally invasive approaches to simple prostatectomy viable alternatives for treating large glands, depending on expertise with the techniques. The purpose of our review is to discuss the minimally invasive robot-assisted approach and compare it to the classic open approach to simple prostatectomy. Recent Findings: Despite longer operative times, the robotic approach is associated with shorter hospital stay and lower morbidity profile. The morbidity of an open approach remains significant. Blood transfusions are 3–4 times as likely compared to a robotic approach and major complications are twice as likely. Consistent with previous literature, our review shows functional outcome improvements like flow rate and symptom score to be comparable between the robotic and open approach. The amount of adenoma resected and PSA decline is also similar among robotic and open cases. Summary: Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy is a safe and effective procedure for BPH secondary to a large prostate gland. Appropriately, it is no longer deemed “investigational” by the latest AUA guidelines on BPH and recommended as an alternative to the open approach.

KW - BPH

KW - OSP

KW - RASP

KW - Robotic simple prostatectomy

KW - Simple prostatectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049800782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049800782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11934-018-0820-1

DO - 10.1007/s11934-018-0820-1

M3 - Review article

VL - 19

JO - Current Urology Reports

JF - Current Urology Reports

SN - 1527-2737

IS - 9

M1 - 71

ER -