Comparison of stochastic vs. conventional transcutaneous electrical stimulation for pain modulation in patients with electromyographically documented radiculopathy

Donna M. Bloodworth, Ben N. Nguyen, Wayne Garver, Frank Moss, Claudia Pedroza, Thao Tran, Faye Y. Chiou-Tan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine if a transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) unit modified to deliver electrical impulses at random (R) or stochastic frequency, called TENS-R, provided better pain relief than conventional TENS. Design: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study at an urban teaching hospital. A total of 13 adult subjects with radiculopathy on electromyogram and chronic radicular pain rated pain before and after walking 100 feet with proximal (axial) placement of TENS leads with randomized settings on conventional TENS, placebo, or TENS-R and, subsequently, with distal (limb) placement of TENS leads with randomized settings, all on the same day. The pain measures used were the McGill Pain Questionnaire, parts 1 and 2, and the Visual Analog Scale. The functional measure was speed of walking. Results: Four men and seven women completed the study pain scores, measured by McGill Pain Questionnaire part 2, significantly improved when the patient used TENS-R vs. conventional TENS (P = 0.006, analysis of variance). Placement of TENS electrodes on the back significantly decreased pain compared with lead placement on the legs for McGill Pain Questionnaire part 1 (P = 0.007), McGill Pain Questionnaire part 2 (P = 0.042), and the Visual Analog Scale (P = 0.026) measures. Conclusions: Qualitative pain scores significantly improved when the patient used TENS-R vs. conventional TENS. Lead placement of any TENS modality over the back vs. over the leg improved all pain scores.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)584-591
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume83
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2004

Fingerprint

Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
Radiculopathy
Pain
Pain Measurement
Visual Analog Scale
Leg
Placebos
Urban Hospitals
Electromyography
Teaching Hospitals
Chronic Pain

Keywords

  • Pain
  • Radiculopathy
  • Stochastic
  • Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Comparison of stochastic vs. conventional transcutaneous electrical stimulation for pain modulation in patients with electromyographically documented radiculopathy. / Bloodworth, Donna M.; Nguyen, Ben N.; Garver, Wayne; Moss, Frank; Pedroza, Claudia; Tran, Thao; Chiou-Tan, Faye Y.

In: American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 83, No. 8, 08.2004, p. 584-591.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ddd648f6f1c443c1b6db6743a814fc14,
title = "Comparison of stochastic vs. conventional transcutaneous electrical stimulation for pain modulation in patients with electromyographically documented radiculopathy",
abstract = "Objective: To determine if a transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) unit modified to deliver electrical impulses at random (R) or stochastic frequency, called TENS-R, provided better pain relief than conventional TENS. Design: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study at an urban teaching hospital. A total of 13 adult subjects with radiculopathy on electromyogram and chronic radicular pain rated pain before and after walking 100 feet with proximal (axial) placement of TENS leads with randomized settings on conventional TENS, placebo, or TENS-R and, subsequently, with distal (limb) placement of TENS leads with randomized settings, all on the same day. The pain measures used were the McGill Pain Questionnaire, parts 1 and 2, and the Visual Analog Scale. The functional measure was speed of walking. Results: Four men and seven women completed the study pain scores, measured by McGill Pain Questionnaire part 2, significantly improved when the patient used TENS-R vs. conventional TENS (P = 0.006, analysis of variance). Placement of TENS electrodes on the back significantly decreased pain compared with lead placement on the legs for McGill Pain Questionnaire part 1 (P = 0.007), McGill Pain Questionnaire part 2 (P = 0.042), and the Visual Analog Scale (P = 0.026) measures. Conclusions: Qualitative pain scores significantly improved when the patient used TENS-R vs. conventional TENS. Lead placement of any TENS modality over the back vs. over the leg improved all pain scores.",
keywords = "Pain, Radiculopathy, Stochastic, Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation",
author = "Bloodworth, {Donna M.} and Nguyen, {Ben N.} and Wayne Garver and Frank Moss and Claudia Pedroza and Thao Tran and Chiou-Tan, {Faye Y.}",
year = "2004",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1097/01.PHM.0000133439.28817.51",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "584--591",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0894-9115",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of stochastic vs. conventional transcutaneous electrical stimulation for pain modulation in patients with electromyographically documented radiculopathy

AU - Bloodworth, Donna M.

AU - Nguyen, Ben N.

AU - Garver, Wayne

AU - Moss, Frank

AU - Pedroza, Claudia

AU - Tran, Thao

AU - Chiou-Tan, Faye Y.

PY - 2004/8

Y1 - 2004/8

N2 - Objective: To determine if a transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) unit modified to deliver electrical impulses at random (R) or stochastic frequency, called TENS-R, provided better pain relief than conventional TENS. Design: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study at an urban teaching hospital. A total of 13 adult subjects with radiculopathy on electromyogram and chronic radicular pain rated pain before and after walking 100 feet with proximal (axial) placement of TENS leads with randomized settings on conventional TENS, placebo, or TENS-R and, subsequently, with distal (limb) placement of TENS leads with randomized settings, all on the same day. The pain measures used were the McGill Pain Questionnaire, parts 1 and 2, and the Visual Analog Scale. The functional measure was speed of walking. Results: Four men and seven women completed the study pain scores, measured by McGill Pain Questionnaire part 2, significantly improved when the patient used TENS-R vs. conventional TENS (P = 0.006, analysis of variance). Placement of TENS electrodes on the back significantly decreased pain compared with lead placement on the legs for McGill Pain Questionnaire part 1 (P = 0.007), McGill Pain Questionnaire part 2 (P = 0.042), and the Visual Analog Scale (P = 0.026) measures. Conclusions: Qualitative pain scores significantly improved when the patient used TENS-R vs. conventional TENS. Lead placement of any TENS modality over the back vs. over the leg improved all pain scores.

AB - Objective: To determine if a transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) unit modified to deliver electrical impulses at random (R) or stochastic frequency, called TENS-R, provided better pain relief than conventional TENS. Design: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study at an urban teaching hospital. A total of 13 adult subjects with radiculopathy on electromyogram and chronic radicular pain rated pain before and after walking 100 feet with proximal (axial) placement of TENS leads with randomized settings on conventional TENS, placebo, or TENS-R and, subsequently, with distal (limb) placement of TENS leads with randomized settings, all on the same day. The pain measures used were the McGill Pain Questionnaire, parts 1 and 2, and the Visual Analog Scale. The functional measure was speed of walking. Results: Four men and seven women completed the study pain scores, measured by McGill Pain Questionnaire part 2, significantly improved when the patient used TENS-R vs. conventional TENS (P = 0.006, analysis of variance). Placement of TENS electrodes on the back significantly decreased pain compared with lead placement on the legs for McGill Pain Questionnaire part 1 (P = 0.007), McGill Pain Questionnaire part 2 (P = 0.042), and the Visual Analog Scale (P = 0.026) measures. Conclusions: Qualitative pain scores significantly improved when the patient used TENS-R vs. conventional TENS. Lead placement of any TENS modality over the back vs. over the leg improved all pain scores.

KW - Pain

KW - Radiculopathy

KW - Stochastic

KW - Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3242750606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3242750606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.PHM.0000133439.28817.51

DO - 10.1097/01.PHM.0000133439.28817.51

M3 - Article

C2 - 15277959

AN - SCOPUS:3242750606

VL - 83

SP - 584

EP - 591

JO - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0894-9115

IS - 8

ER -