Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement

Ranjith Babu, Jong G. Park, Ankit I. Mehta, Tony Shan, Peter M. Grossi, Christopher R. Brown, William J. Richardson, Robert E. Isaacs, Carlos A. Bagley, Maragatha Kuchibhatla, Oren N. Gottfried

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Superior-level facet joint violation by pedicle screws may result in increased stress to the level above the instrumentation and may contribute to adjacent segment disease. Previous studies have evaluated facet joint violations in open or percutaneous screw cases, but there are no reports describing a direct institutional comparison. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of superior-level facet violation for open vs percutaneous pedicle screws and to evaluate patient and surgical factors that affect this outcome. METHODS: We reviewed 279 consecutive patients who underwent an index instrumented lumbar fusion from 2007 to 2011 for degenerative spine disease with stenosis with or without spondylolisthesis. We used a computed tomography grading system that represents progressively increasing grades of facet joint violation. Patient and surgical factors were evaluated to determine their impact on facet violation. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 126 open and 153 percutaneous cases. Percutaneous procedures had a higher overall violation grade (P =.02) and a greater incidence of high-grade violations (P =.006) compared with open procedures. Bivariate analysis showed significantly greater violations in percutaneous cases for age < 65 years, obesity, pedicle screws at L4, and 1-and 2-level surgeries. Multivariate analysis showed the percutaneous approach and depth of the spine to be independent risk factors for high-grade violations. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates greater facet violations for percutaneously placed pedicle screws compared with open screws.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)962-969
Number of pages8
JournalNeurosurgery
Volume71
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2012

Fingerprint

Zygapophyseal Joint
Spine
Spondylolisthesis
Incidence
Pathologic Constriction
Multivariate Analysis
Obesity
Tomography
Pedicle Screws

Keywords

  • Adjacent segment disease
  • Depth of spine
  • Facet joint violation
  • Open
  • Percutaneous

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Babu, R., Park, J. G., Mehta, A. I., Shan, T., Grossi, P. M., Brown, C. R., ... Gottfried, O. N. (2012). Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement. Neurosurgery, 71(5), 962-969. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826a88c8

Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement. / Babu, Ranjith; Park, Jong G.; Mehta, Ankit I.; Shan, Tony; Grossi, Peter M.; Brown, Christopher R.; Richardson, William J.; Isaacs, Robert E.; Bagley, Carlos A.; Kuchibhatla, Maragatha; Gottfried, Oren N.

In: Neurosurgery, Vol. 71, No. 5, 01.11.2012, p. 962-969.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Babu, R, Park, JG, Mehta, AI, Shan, T, Grossi, PM, Brown, CR, Richardson, WJ, Isaacs, RE, Bagley, CA, Kuchibhatla, M & Gottfried, ON 2012, 'Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement', Neurosurgery, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 962-969. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826a88c8
Babu, Ranjith ; Park, Jong G. ; Mehta, Ankit I. ; Shan, Tony ; Grossi, Peter M. ; Brown, Christopher R. ; Richardson, William J. ; Isaacs, Robert E. ; Bagley, Carlos A. ; Kuchibhatla, Maragatha ; Gottfried, Oren N. / Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement. In: Neurosurgery. 2012 ; Vol. 71, No. 5. pp. 962-969.
@article{e8d47a49c33247bebc10f3edbacb688e,
title = "Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Superior-level facet joint violation by pedicle screws may result in increased stress to the level above the instrumentation and may contribute to adjacent segment disease. Previous studies have evaluated facet joint violations in open or percutaneous screw cases, but there are no reports describing a direct institutional comparison. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of superior-level facet violation for open vs percutaneous pedicle screws and to evaluate patient and surgical factors that affect this outcome. METHODS: We reviewed 279 consecutive patients who underwent an index instrumented lumbar fusion from 2007 to 2011 for degenerative spine disease with stenosis with or without spondylolisthesis. We used a computed tomography grading system that represents progressively increasing grades of facet joint violation. Patient and surgical factors were evaluated to determine their impact on facet violation. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 126 open and 153 percutaneous cases. Percutaneous procedures had a higher overall violation grade (P =.02) and a greater incidence of high-grade violations (P =.006) compared with open procedures. Bivariate analysis showed significantly greater violations in percutaneous cases for age < 65 years, obesity, pedicle screws at L4, and 1-and 2-level surgeries. Multivariate analysis showed the percutaneous approach and depth of the spine to be independent risk factors for high-grade violations. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates greater facet violations for percutaneously placed pedicle screws compared with open screws.",
keywords = "Adjacent segment disease, Depth of spine, Facet joint violation, Open, Percutaneous",
author = "Ranjith Babu and Park, {Jong G.} and Mehta, {Ankit I.} and Tony Shan and Grossi, {Peter M.} and Brown, {Christopher R.} and Richardson, {William J.} and Isaacs, {Robert E.} and Bagley, {Carlos A.} and Maragatha Kuchibhatla and Gottfried, {Oren N.}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826a88c8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "962--969",
journal = "Neurosurgery",
issn = "0148-396X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement

AU - Babu, Ranjith

AU - Park, Jong G.

AU - Mehta, Ankit I.

AU - Shan, Tony

AU - Grossi, Peter M.

AU - Brown, Christopher R.

AU - Richardson, William J.

AU - Isaacs, Robert E.

AU - Bagley, Carlos A.

AU - Kuchibhatla, Maragatha

AU - Gottfried, Oren N.

PY - 2012/11/1

Y1 - 2012/11/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Superior-level facet joint violation by pedicle screws may result in increased stress to the level above the instrumentation and may contribute to adjacent segment disease. Previous studies have evaluated facet joint violations in open or percutaneous screw cases, but there are no reports describing a direct institutional comparison. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of superior-level facet violation for open vs percutaneous pedicle screws and to evaluate patient and surgical factors that affect this outcome. METHODS: We reviewed 279 consecutive patients who underwent an index instrumented lumbar fusion from 2007 to 2011 for degenerative spine disease with stenosis with or without spondylolisthesis. We used a computed tomography grading system that represents progressively increasing grades of facet joint violation. Patient and surgical factors were evaluated to determine their impact on facet violation. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 126 open and 153 percutaneous cases. Percutaneous procedures had a higher overall violation grade (P =.02) and a greater incidence of high-grade violations (P =.006) compared with open procedures. Bivariate analysis showed significantly greater violations in percutaneous cases for age < 65 years, obesity, pedicle screws at L4, and 1-and 2-level surgeries. Multivariate analysis showed the percutaneous approach and depth of the spine to be independent risk factors for high-grade violations. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates greater facet violations for percutaneously placed pedicle screws compared with open screws.

AB - BACKGROUND: Superior-level facet joint violation by pedicle screws may result in increased stress to the level above the instrumentation and may contribute to adjacent segment disease. Previous studies have evaluated facet joint violations in open or percutaneous screw cases, but there are no reports describing a direct institutional comparison. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of superior-level facet violation for open vs percutaneous pedicle screws and to evaluate patient and surgical factors that affect this outcome. METHODS: We reviewed 279 consecutive patients who underwent an index instrumented lumbar fusion from 2007 to 2011 for degenerative spine disease with stenosis with or without spondylolisthesis. We used a computed tomography grading system that represents progressively increasing grades of facet joint violation. Patient and surgical factors were evaluated to determine their impact on facet violation. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 126 open and 153 percutaneous cases. Percutaneous procedures had a higher overall violation grade (P =.02) and a greater incidence of high-grade violations (P =.006) compared with open procedures. Bivariate analysis showed significantly greater violations in percutaneous cases for age < 65 years, obesity, pedicle screws at L4, and 1-and 2-level surgeries. Multivariate analysis showed the percutaneous approach and depth of the spine to be independent risk factors for high-grade violations. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates greater facet violations for percutaneously placed pedicle screws compared with open screws.

KW - Adjacent segment disease

KW - Depth of spine

KW - Facet joint violation

KW - Open

KW - Percutaneous

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868199497&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868199497&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826a88c8

DO - 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826a88c8

M3 - Article

C2 - 22843132

AN - SCOPUS:84868199497

VL - 71

SP - 962

EP - 969

JO - Neurosurgery

JF - Neurosurgery

SN - 0148-396X

IS - 5

ER -