Comparison of traditional six-year and new four-year dental curricula in South Korea.

Takashi Komabayashi, Chul Ahn, Kang Ju Kim, Hyo Won Oh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the dental curriculum of the traditional six-year system with that of the new four-year (graduate-entry) system in South Korea. There are 11 dental schools in South Korea: six are public and five are private. Eight offer the new four-year program and the other three offer the traditional six-year program. Descriptive analyses were conducted using bibliographic data and local information along with statistical analyses such as chi-square tests. In the six-year programs, clinical dentistry subjects were taught almost equally in practical and didactic courses, while the basic science courses were taught more often as practical courses (P < 0.0001). In the four-year programs, both the basic science and clinical dentistry subjects were taught didactically more often; while more dentistry subjects were taught than basic sciences (P = 0.004). The four-year program model in South Korea is more focused on dentistry than on basic science, while both basic and clinical dentistry subjects were equally taught in the six-year program.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)191-196
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Oral Science
Volume54
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of traditional six-year and new four-year dental curricula in South Korea.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this