Competing values: A respectful critique of narrative research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Smythe and Murray (2000) presented the basic ethical issues in narrative research (NR) in a comprehensive, well-reasoned, and direct manner. In this critique, we highlight 3 issues. Two matters appear to challenge the internal inconsistency of the assumptions of NR: privileging some voices over others and a potential inherent conflict of interest for some researchers. We also examine some issues regarding the protection of research participants and conclude with modest recommendations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)191-194
Number of pages4
JournalEthics and Behavior
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Keywords

  • Ethics
  • Narrative research
  • Postmodern
  • Research ethics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Competing values: A respectful critique of narrative research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this