Complicated appendicitis: Immediate operation or trial of nonoperative management?

Neha Nimmagadda, Kazuhide Matsushima, Alice Piccinini, Caroline Park, Aaron Strumwasser, Lydia Lam, Kenji Inaba, Demetrios Demetriades

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The optimal treatment for complicated appendicitis remains controversial. We sought to compare clinical outcomes of patients with complicated appendicitis treated with an immediate operation or a trial of nonoperative management. Methods: Adult patients (≥18 years) with complicated appendicitis were included. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared between the immediate operation group and the nonoperative management group. Results: A total of 101 patients met our inclusion criteria. Of those, 36 patients received an initial trial of nonoperative management with an 86.1% success rate. Patients who failed nonoperative management required significantly longer hospital stays than those in the immediate operation group (11 vs. 5 days). An immediate operation was performed in 65 patients. Open surgery was required in 9 patients (13.8%). Postoperatively, 7 patients (10.8%) required percutaneous drainage of intraabdominal abscess. Conclusions: Nonoperative management was successful in the majority of patients with complicated appendicitis, whereas failure of nonoperative management was associated with prolonged hospital stay. Patients who underwent an immediate operation often required percutaneous drainage of intraabdominal abscess.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)713-717
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican journal of surgery
Volume217
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Appendicitis
Abscess
Drainage
Length of Stay

Keywords

  • Complicated appendicitis
  • Immediate operation
  • Nonoperative management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Nimmagadda, N., Matsushima, K., Piccinini, A., Park, C., Strumwasser, A., Lam, L., ... Demetriades, D. (2019). Complicated appendicitis: Immediate operation or trial of nonoperative management? American journal of surgery, 217(4), 713-717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.12.061

Complicated appendicitis : Immediate operation or trial of nonoperative management? / Nimmagadda, Neha; Matsushima, Kazuhide; Piccinini, Alice; Park, Caroline; Strumwasser, Aaron; Lam, Lydia; Inaba, Kenji; Demetriades, Demetrios.

In: American journal of surgery, Vol. 217, No. 4, 04.2019, p. 713-717.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nimmagadda, N, Matsushima, K, Piccinini, A, Park, C, Strumwasser, A, Lam, L, Inaba, K & Demetriades, D 2019, 'Complicated appendicitis: Immediate operation or trial of nonoperative management?', American journal of surgery, vol. 217, no. 4, pp. 713-717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.12.061
Nimmagadda, Neha ; Matsushima, Kazuhide ; Piccinini, Alice ; Park, Caroline ; Strumwasser, Aaron ; Lam, Lydia ; Inaba, Kenji ; Demetriades, Demetrios. / Complicated appendicitis : Immediate operation or trial of nonoperative management?. In: American journal of surgery. 2019 ; Vol. 217, No. 4. pp. 713-717.
@article{daca494739724b35af70e92037425ec4,
title = "Complicated appendicitis: Immediate operation or trial of nonoperative management?",
abstract = "Background: The optimal treatment for complicated appendicitis remains controversial. We sought to compare clinical outcomes of patients with complicated appendicitis treated with an immediate operation or a trial of nonoperative management. Methods: Adult patients (≥18 years) with complicated appendicitis were included. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared between the immediate operation group and the nonoperative management group. Results: A total of 101 patients met our inclusion criteria. Of those, 36 patients received an initial trial of nonoperative management with an 86.1{\%} success rate. Patients who failed nonoperative management required significantly longer hospital stays than those in the immediate operation group (11 vs. 5 days). An immediate operation was performed in 65 patients. Open surgery was required in 9 patients (13.8{\%}). Postoperatively, 7 patients (10.8{\%}) required percutaneous drainage of intraabdominal abscess. Conclusions: Nonoperative management was successful in the majority of patients with complicated appendicitis, whereas failure of nonoperative management was associated with prolonged hospital stay. Patients who underwent an immediate operation often required percutaneous drainage of intraabdominal abscess.",
keywords = "Complicated appendicitis, Immediate operation, Nonoperative management",
author = "Neha Nimmagadda and Kazuhide Matsushima and Alice Piccinini and Caroline Park and Aaron Strumwasser and Lydia Lam and Kenji Inaba and Demetrios Demetriades",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.12.061",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "217",
pages = "713--717",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complicated appendicitis

T2 - Immediate operation or trial of nonoperative management?

AU - Nimmagadda, Neha

AU - Matsushima, Kazuhide

AU - Piccinini, Alice

AU - Park, Caroline

AU - Strumwasser, Aaron

AU - Lam, Lydia

AU - Inaba, Kenji

AU - Demetriades, Demetrios

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - Background: The optimal treatment for complicated appendicitis remains controversial. We sought to compare clinical outcomes of patients with complicated appendicitis treated with an immediate operation or a trial of nonoperative management. Methods: Adult patients (≥18 years) with complicated appendicitis were included. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared between the immediate operation group and the nonoperative management group. Results: A total of 101 patients met our inclusion criteria. Of those, 36 patients received an initial trial of nonoperative management with an 86.1% success rate. Patients who failed nonoperative management required significantly longer hospital stays than those in the immediate operation group (11 vs. 5 days). An immediate operation was performed in 65 patients. Open surgery was required in 9 patients (13.8%). Postoperatively, 7 patients (10.8%) required percutaneous drainage of intraabdominal abscess. Conclusions: Nonoperative management was successful in the majority of patients with complicated appendicitis, whereas failure of nonoperative management was associated with prolonged hospital stay. Patients who underwent an immediate operation often required percutaneous drainage of intraabdominal abscess.

AB - Background: The optimal treatment for complicated appendicitis remains controversial. We sought to compare clinical outcomes of patients with complicated appendicitis treated with an immediate operation or a trial of nonoperative management. Methods: Adult patients (≥18 years) with complicated appendicitis were included. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared between the immediate operation group and the nonoperative management group. Results: A total of 101 patients met our inclusion criteria. Of those, 36 patients received an initial trial of nonoperative management with an 86.1% success rate. Patients who failed nonoperative management required significantly longer hospital stays than those in the immediate operation group (11 vs. 5 days). An immediate operation was performed in 65 patients. Open surgery was required in 9 patients (13.8%). Postoperatively, 7 patients (10.8%) required percutaneous drainage of intraabdominal abscess. Conclusions: Nonoperative management was successful in the majority of patients with complicated appendicitis, whereas failure of nonoperative management was associated with prolonged hospital stay. Patients who underwent an immediate operation often required percutaneous drainage of intraabdominal abscess.

KW - Complicated appendicitis

KW - Immediate operation

KW - Nonoperative management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059550077&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059550077&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.12.061

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.12.061

M3 - Article

C2 - 30635209

AN - SCOPUS:85059550077

VL - 217

SP - 713

EP - 717

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 4

ER -