Complications in brow lifts: A systemic review of surgical and nonsurgical brow rejuvenations

Min Jeong Cho, Jourdan A. Carboy, Rodney J Rohrich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Brow lift has been a part of plastic surgeons' armamentarium for over a century. Although there are multiple different techniques available, there has been a dearth of literature comparing which technique is better and has lesser complications. In this study, we performed a systemic literature review of all brow lift techniques to determine and compare complication rates of each technique. Methods: We performed a computerized search of brow rejuvenation techniques using the MEDLINE database. Data regarding the type of brow lift procedure, number of patients, and complications were collected. Results: The systematic review was performed in December of 2017. A total of 326 articles were identified initially, and 76 studies remained after final review. The review showed highest revision rate in the hairline brow lift (7.4%), highest numbness rate in the direct brow lift (5.5%), highest asymmetry rate in the temporal/lateral brow lift (1.5%), and highest alopecia rate in the endoscopic brow lift (2.8%). In addition, we found 5 studies in nonsurgical brow rejuvenation (3 botulinum toxin, 1 fat injection, 1 radiofrequency). Conclusion: Our study shows that each brow technique has a different complication profile, and it is important for plastic surgeons to understand the difference. Furthermore, the study demonstrated the lack of randomized prospective outcome studies and standardization of outcome measures in brow rejuvenation. We believe this information would be the key and next frontier in providing technically safe and long-lasting aesthetic outcomes for the patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere1943
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
Volume6
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Rejuvenation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Botulinum Toxins
Hypesthesia
Alopecia
Esthetics
MEDLINE
Fats
Databases
Prospective Studies
Injections
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Complications in brow lifts : A systemic review of surgical and nonsurgical brow rejuvenations. / Cho, Min Jeong; Carboy, Jourdan A.; Rohrich, Rodney J.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open, Vol. 6, No. 10, e1943, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{783bc2387eab4d1b85342c02102753d8,
title = "Complications in brow lifts: A systemic review of surgical and nonsurgical brow rejuvenations",
abstract = "Background: Brow lift has been a part of plastic surgeons' armamentarium for over a century. Although there are multiple different techniques available, there has been a dearth of literature comparing which technique is better and has lesser complications. In this study, we performed a systemic literature review of all brow lift techniques to determine and compare complication rates of each technique. Methods: We performed a computerized search of brow rejuvenation techniques using the MEDLINE database. Data regarding the type of brow lift procedure, number of patients, and complications were collected. Results: The systematic review was performed in December of 2017. A total of 326 articles were identified initially, and 76 studies remained after final review. The review showed highest revision rate in the hairline brow lift (7.4{\%}), highest numbness rate in the direct brow lift (5.5{\%}), highest asymmetry rate in the temporal/lateral brow lift (1.5{\%}), and highest alopecia rate in the endoscopic brow lift (2.8{\%}). In addition, we found 5 studies in nonsurgical brow rejuvenation (3 botulinum toxin, 1 fat injection, 1 radiofrequency). Conclusion: Our study shows that each brow technique has a different complication profile, and it is important for plastic surgeons to understand the difference. Furthermore, the study demonstrated the lack of randomized prospective outcome studies and standardization of outcome measures in brow rejuvenation. We believe this information would be the key and next frontier in providing technically safe and long-lasting aesthetic outcomes for the patients.",
author = "Cho, {Min Jeong} and Carboy, {Jourdan A.} and Rohrich, {Rodney J}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/GOX.0000000000001943",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open",
issn = "2169-7574",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complications in brow lifts

T2 - A systemic review of surgical and nonsurgical brow rejuvenations

AU - Cho, Min Jeong

AU - Carboy, Jourdan A.

AU - Rohrich, Rodney J

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: Brow lift has been a part of plastic surgeons' armamentarium for over a century. Although there are multiple different techniques available, there has been a dearth of literature comparing which technique is better and has lesser complications. In this study, we performed a systemic literature review of all brow lift techniques to determine and compare complication rates of each technique. Methods: We performed a computerized search of brow rejuvenation techniques using the MEDLINE database. Data regarding the type of brow lift procedure, number of patients, and complications were collected. Results: The systematic review was performed in December of 2017. A total of 326 articles were identified initially, and 76 studies remained after final review. The review showed highest revision rate in the hairline brow lift (7.4%), highest numbness rate in the direct brow lift (5.5%), highest asymmetry rate in the temporal/lateral brow lift (1.5%), and highest alopecia rate in the endoscopic brow lift (2.8%). In addition, we found 5 studies in nonsurgical brow rejuvenation (3 botulinum toxin, 1 fat injection, 1 radiofrequency). Conclusion: Our study shows that each brow technique has a different complication profile, and it is important for plastic surgeons to understand the difference. Furthermore, the study demonstrated the lack of randomized prospective outcome studies and standardization of outcome measures in brow rejuvenation. We believe this information would be the key and next frontier in providing technically safe and long-lasting aesthetic outcomes for the patients.

AB - Background: Brow lift has been a part of plastic surgeons' armamentarium for over a century. Although there are multiple different techniques available, there has been a dearth of literature comparing which technique is better and has lesser complications. In this study, we performed a systemic literature review of all brow lift techniques to determine and compare complication rates of each technique. Methods: We performed a computerized search of brow rejuvenation techniques using the MEDLINE database. Data regarding the type of brow lift procedure, number of patients, and complications were collected. Results: The systematic review was performed in December of 2017. A total of 326 articles were identified initially, and 76 studies remained after final review. The review showed highest revision rate in the hairline brow lift (7.4%), highest numbness rate in the direct brow lift (5.5%), highest asymmetry rate in the temporal/lateral brow lift (1.5%), and highest alopecia rate in the endoscopic brow lift (2.8%). In addition, we found 5 studies in nonsurgical brow rejuvenation (3 botulinum toxin, 1 fat injection, 1 radiofrequency). Conclusion: Our study shows that each brow technique has a different complication profile, and it is important for plastic surgeons to understand the difference. Furthermore, the study demonstrated the lack of randomized prospective outcome studies and standardization of outcome measures in brow rejuvenation. We believe this information would be the key and next frontier in providing technically safe and long-lasting aesthetic outcomes for the patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065195302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065195302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001943

DO - 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001943

M3 - Article

C2 - 30534495

AN - SCOPUS:85065195302

VL - 6

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open

SN - 2169-7574

IS - 10

M1 - e1943

ER -