Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to stopping-power-ratio estimation using dual-energy CT imaging

B. Li, H. C. Lee, X. Duan, C. Shen, L. Zhou, X. Jia, M. Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The dual-energy CT-based (DECT) approach holds promise in reducing the overall uncertainty in proton stopping-power-ratio (SPR) estimation as compared to the conventional stoichiometric calibration approach. The objective of this study was to analyze the factors contributing to uncertainty in SPR estimation using the DECT-based approach and to derive a comprehensive estimate of the range uncertainty associated with SPR estimation in treatment planning. Two state-of-the-art DECT-based methods were selected and implemented on a Siemens SOMATOM Force DECT scanner. The uncertainties were first divided into five independent categories. The uncertainty associated with each category was estimated for lung, soft and bone tissues separately. A single composite uncertainty estimate was eventually determined for three tumor sites (lung, prostate and head-and-neck) by weighting the relative proportion of each tissue group for that specific site. The uncertainties associated with the two selected DECT methods were found to be similar, therefore the following results applied to both methods. The overall uncertainty (1σ) in SPR estimation with the DECT-based approach was estimated to be 3.8%, 1.2% and 2.0% for lung, soft and bone tissues, respectively. The dominant factor contributing to uncertainty in the DECT approach was the imaging uncertainties, followed by the DECT modeling uncertainties. Our study showed that the DECT approach can reduce the overall range uncertainty to approximately 2.2% (2σ) in clinical scenarios, in contrast to the previously reported 1%.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7056-7074
Number of pages19
JournalPhysics in Medicine and Biology
Volume62
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 9 2017

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
Protons
Lung
Bone and Bones
Calibration
Statistical Factor Analysis
Prostate
Neck
Head

Keywords

  • dual-energy computed tomography
  • proton stopping power ratio
  • proton therapy
  • range uncertainty
  • treatment planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to stopping-power-ratio estimation using dual-energy CT imaging. / Li, B.; Lee, H. C.; Duan, X.; Shen, C.; Zhou, L.; Jia, X.; Yang, M.

In: Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 62, No. 17, 09.08.2017, p. 7056-7074.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b1fa27d438474ee4a9137a3570e76fb8,
title = "Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to stopping-power-ratio estimation using dual-energy CT imaging",
abstract = "The dual-energy CT-based (DECT) approach holds promise in reducing the overall uncertainty in proton stopping-power-ratio (SPR) estimation as compared to the conventional stoichiometric calibration approach. The objective of this study was to analyze the factors contributing to uncertainty in SPR estimation using the DECT-based approach and to derive a comprehensive estimate of the range uncertainty associated with SPR estimation in treatment planning. Two state-of-the-art DECT-based methods were selected and implemented on a Siemens SOMATOM Force DECT scanner. The uncertainties were first divided into five independent categories. The uncertainty associated with each category was estimated for lung, soft and bone tissues separately. A single composite uncertainty estimate was eventually determined for three tumor sites (lung, prostate and head-and-neck) by weighting the relative proportion of each tissue group for that specific site. The uncertainties associated with the two selected DECT methods were found to be similar, therefore the following results applied to both methods. The overall uncertainty (1σ) in SPR estimation with the DECT-based approach was estimated to be 3.8{\%}, 1.2{\%} and 2.0{\%} for lung, soft and bone tissues, respectively. The dominant factor contributing to uncertainty in the DECT approach was the imaging uncertainties, followed by the DECT modeling uncertainties. Our study showed that the DECT approach can reduce the overall range uncertainty to approximately 2.2{\%} (2σ) in clinical scenarios, in contrast to the previously reported 1{\%}.",
keywords = "dual-energy computed tomography, proton stopping power ratio, proton therapy, range uncertainty, treatment planning",
author = "B. Li and Lee, {H. C.} and X. Duan and C. Shen and L. Zhou and X. Jia and M. Yang",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1088/1361-6560/aa7dc9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "7056--7074",
journal = "Physics in Medicine and Biology",
issn = "0031-9155",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to stopping-power-ratio estimation using dual-energy CT imaging

AU - Li, B.

AU - Lee, H. C.

AU - Duan, X.

AU - Shen, C.

AU - Zhou, L.

AU - Jia, X.

AU - Yang, M.

PY - 2017/8/9

Y1 - 2017/8/9

N2 - The dual-energy CT-based (DECT) approach holds promise in reducing the overall uncertainty in proton stopping-power-ratio (SPR) estimation as compared to the conventional stoichiometric calibration approach. The objective of this study was to analyze the factors contributing to uncertainty in SPR estimation using the DECT-based approach and to derive a comprehensive estimate of the range uncertainty associated with SPR estimation in treatment planning. Two state-of-the-art DECT-based methods were selected and implemented on a Siemens SOMATOM Force DECT scanner. The uncertainties were first divided into five independent categories. The uncertainty associated with each category was estimated for lung, soft and bone tissues separately. A single composite uncertainty estimate was eventually determined for three tumor sites (lung, prostate and head-and-neck) by weighting the relative proportion of each tissue group for that specific site. The uncertainties associated with the two selected DECT methods were found to be similar, therefore the following results applied to both methods. The overall uncertainty (1σ) in SPR estimation with the DECT-based approach was estimated to be 3.8%, 1.2% and 2.0% for lung, soft and bone tissues, respectively. The dominant factor contributing to uncertainty in the DECT approach was the imaging uncertainties, followed by the DECT modeling uncertainties. Our study showed that the DECT approach can reduce the overall range uncertainty to approximately 2.2% (2σ) in clinical scenarios, in contrast to the previously reported 1%.

AB - The dual-energy CT-based (DECT) approach holds promise in reducing the overall uncertainty in proton stopping-power-ratio (SPR) estimation as compared to the conventional stoichiometric calibration approach. The objective of this study was to analyze the factors contributing to uncertainty in SPR estimation using the DECT-based approach and to derive a comprehensive estimate of the range uncertainty associated with SPR estimation in treatment planning. Two state-of-the-art DECT-based methods were selected and implemented on a Siemens SOMATOM Force DECT scanner. The uncertainties were first divided into five independent categories. The uncertainty associated with each category was estimated for lung, soft and bone tissues separately. A single composite uncertainty estimate was eventually determined for three tumor sites (lung, prostate and head-and-neck) by weighting the relative proportion of each tissue group for that specific site. The uncertainties associated with the two selected DECT methods were found to be similar, therefore the following results applied to both methods. The overall uncertainty (1σ) in SPR estimation with the DECT-based approach was estimated to be 3.8%, 1.2% and 2.0% for lung, soft and bone tissues, respectively. The dominant factor contributing to uncertainty in the DECT approach was the imaging uncertainties, followed by the DECT modeling uncertainties. Our study showed that the DECT approach can reduce the overall range uncertainty to approximately 2.2% (2σ) in clinical scenarios, in contrast to the previously reported 1%.

KW - dual-energy computed tomography

KW - proton stopping power ratio

KW - proton therapy

KW - range uncertainty

KW - treatment planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028466039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028466039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1361-6560/aa7dc9

DO - 10.1088/1361-6560/aa7dc9

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 7056

EP - 7074

JO - Physics in Medicine and Biology

JF - Physics in Medicine and Biology

SN - 0031-9155

IS - 17

ER -