Conceptualization and rationale for consensus definitions of terms in major depressive disorder: Remission, recovery, relapse, and recurrence

Ellen Frank, Robert F. Prien, Robin B. Jarrett, Martin B. Keller, David J. Kupfer, Philip W. Lavori, A. John Rush, Myrna M. Weissman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1570 Scopus citations

Abstract

In 1988, the MacArthur Foundation Research Network on the Psychobiology of Depression convened a task force to examine the ways in which change points in the course of depressive illness had been described and the extent to which inconsistency in these descriptions might be impeding research on this disorder. We found considerable inconsistency across and even within research reports and concluded that research on depressive illness would be well served by greater consistency in the definition change points in the course of illness. We propose an internally consistent, empirically defined conceptual scheme for the terms remission, recovery, relapse, and recurrence. In addition, we propose tentative operational criteria for each term. Finally, we discuss ways to assess the usefulness of such operational criteria through reanalysis of existing data and the design and conduct of new experiments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)851-855
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of General Psychiatry
Volume48
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Conceptualization and rationale for consensus definitions of terms in major depressive disorder: Remission, recovery, relapse, and recurrence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this