Conservative fluid therapy in septic shock

An example of targeted therapeutic minimization

Catherine Chen, Marin H. Kollef

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Intravenous fluids (IVFs) represent a basic therapeutic intervention utilized in septic shock. Unfortunately, the optimal method for administering IVFs to maximize patient outcomes is unknown. A meta-analysis of four randomized trials of goal-directed therapy did not demonstrate a significant reduction in mortality (odds ratio 0.609; 95% confidence interval 0.363 to 1.020; P = 0.059), whereas 18 trials with historical controls showed a significant increase in survival (odds ratio 0.580; 95% confidence interval 0.501 to 0.672; P < 0.0001). Based on these data, clinicians should be aware of the potential for harm due to the excessive administration of IVFs to patients with septic shock.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number481
JournalCritical Care
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 29 2014

Fingerprint

Fluid Therapy
Septic Shock
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Intravenous Administration
Meta-Analysis
Survival
Mortality
Therapeutics
Conservative Treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Conservative fluid therapy in septic shock : An example of targeted therapeutic minimization. / Chen, Catherine; Kollef, Marin H.

In: Critical Care, Vol. 18, No. 4, 481, 29.08.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9c1a77745d4442edb94245d16df2798e,
title = "Conservative fluid therapy in septic shock: An example of targeted therapeutic minimization",
abstract = "Intravenous fluids (IVFs) represent a basic therapeutic intervention utilized in septic shock. Unfortunately, the optimal method for administering IVFs to maximize patient outcomes is unknown. A meta-analysis of four randomized trials of goal-directed therapy did not demonstrate a significant reduction in mortality (odds ratio 0.609; 95{\%} confidence interval 0.363 to 1.020; P = 0.059), whereas 18 trials with historical controls showed a significant increase in survival (odds ratio 0.580; 95{\%} confidence interval 0.501 to 0.672; P < 0.0001). Based on these data, clinicians should be aware of the potential for harm due to the excessive administration of IVFs to patients with septic shock.",
author = "Catherine Chen and Kollef, {Marin H.}",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1186/s13054-014-0481-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
journal = "Critical Care",
issn = "1466-609X",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conservative fluid therapy in septic shock

T2 - An example of targeted therapeutic minimization

AU - Chen, Catherine

AU - Kollef, Marin H.

PY - 2014/8/29

Y1 - 2014/8/29

N2 - Intravenous fluids (IVFs) represent a basic therapeutic intervention utilized in septic shock. Unfortunately, the optimal method for administering IVFs to maximize patient outcomes is unknown. A meta-analysis of four randomized trials of goal-directed therapy did not demonstrate a significant reduction in mortality (odds ratio 0.609; 95% confidence interval 0.363 to 1.020; P = 0.059), whereas 18 trials with historical controls showed a significant increase in survival (odds ratio 0.580; 95% confidence interval 0.501 to 0.672; P < 0.0001). Based on these data, clinicians should be aware of the potential for harm due to the excessive administration of IVFs to patients with septic shock.

AB - Intravenous fluids (IVFs) represent a basic therapeutic intervention utilized in septic shock. Unfortunately, the optimal method for administering IVFs to maximize patient outcomes is unknown. A meta-analysis of four randomized trials of goal-directed therapy did not demonstrate a significant reduction in mortality (odds ratio 0.609; 95% confidence interval 0.363 to 1.020; P = 0.059), whereas 18 trials with historical controls showed a significant increase in survival (odds ratio 0.580; 95% confidence interval 0.501 to 0.672; P < 0.0001). Based on these data, clinicians should be aware of the potential for harm due to the excessive administration of IVFs to patients with septic shock.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906827851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906827851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13054-014-0481-5

DO - 10.1186/s13054-014-0481-5

M3 - Article

VL - 18

JO - Critical Care

JF - Critical Care

SN - 1466-609X

IS - 4

M1 - 481

ER -