Constrained optimization for position calibration of an NMR field camera

Paul Chang, Sahar Nassirpour, Martin Eschelbach, Klaus Scheffler, Anke Henning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Knowledge of the positions of field probes in an NMR field camera is necessary for monitoring the B 0 field. The typical method of estimating these positions is by switching the gradients with known strengths and calculating the positions using the phases of the FIDs. We investigated improving the accuracy of estimating the probe positions and analyzed the effect of inaccurate estimations on field monitoring. Methods: The field probe positions were estimated by 1) assuming ideal gradient fields, 2) using measured gradient fields (including nonlinearities), and 3) using measured gradient fields with relative position constraints. The fields measured with the NMR field camera were compared to fields acquired using a dual-echo gradient recalled echo B 0 mapping sequence. Comparisons were done for shim fields from second- to fourth-order shim terms. Results: The position estimation was the most accurate when relative position constraints were used in conjunction with measured (nonlinear) gradient fields. The effect of more accurate position estimates was seen when compared to fields measured using a B 0 mapping sequence (up to 10%–15% more accurate for some shim fields). The models acquired from the field camera are sensitive to noise due to the low number of spatial sample points. Conclusion: Position estimation of field probes in an NMR camera can be improved using relative position constraints and nonlinear gradient fields. Magn Reson Med 80:380–390, 2018.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)380-390
Number of pages11
JournalMagnetic resonance in medicine
Volume80
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Calibration
Noise
High-Q-Bond

Keywords

  • Field monitoring
  • high order B shim
  • NMR field camera
  • NMR field probes
  • position calibration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Constrained optimization for position calibration of an NMR field camera. / Chang, Paul; Nassirpour, Sahar; Eschelbach, Martin; Scheffler, Klaus; Henning, Anke.

In: Magnetic resonance in medicine, Vol. 80, No. 1, 07.2018, p. 380-390.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chang, Paul ; Nassirpour, Sahar ; Eschelbach, Martin ; Scheffler, Klaus ; Henning, Anke. / Constrained optimization for position calibration of an NMR field camera. In: Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 80, No. 1. pp. 380-390.
@article{c7c10c63939d4cb6954d39f9f5ef0c69,
title = "Constrained optimization for position calibration of an NMR field camera",
abstract = "Purpose: Knowledge of the positions of field probes in an NMR field camera is necessary for monitoring the B 0 field. The typical method of estimating these positions is by switching the gradients with known strengths and calculating the positions using the phases of the FIDs. We investigated improving the accuracy of estimating the probe positions and analyzed the effect of inaccurate estimations on field monitoring. Methods: The field probe positions were estimated by 1) assuming ideal gradient fields, 2) using measured gradient fields (including nonlinearities), and 3) using measured gradient fields with relative position constraints. The fields measured with the NMR field camera were compared to fields acquired using a dual-echo gradient recalled echo B 0 mapping sequence. Comparisons were done for shim fields from second- to fourth-order shim terms. Results: The position estimation was the most accurate when relative position constraints were used in conjunction with measured (nonlinear) gradient fields. The effect of more accurate position estimates was seen when compared to fields measured using a B 0 mapping sequence (up to 10{\%}–15{\%} more accurate for some shim fields). The models acquired from the field camera are sensitive to noise due to the low number of spatial sample points. Conclusion: Position estimation of field probes in an NMR camera can be improved using relative position constraints and nonlinear gradient fields. Magn Reson Med 80:380–390, 2018.",
keywords = "Field monitoring, high order B shim, NMR field camera, NMR field probes, position calibration",
author = "Paul Chang and Sahar Nassirpour and Martin Eschelbach and Klaus Scheffler and Anke Henning",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1002/mrm.27010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "380--390",
journal = "Magnetic Resonance in Medicine",
issn = "0740-3194",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constrained optimization for position calibration of an NMR field camera

AU - Chang, Paul

AU - Nassirpour, Sahar

AU - Eschelbach, Martin

AU - Scheffler, Klaus

AU - Henning, Anke

PY - 2018/7

Y1 - 2018/7

N2 - Purpose: Knowledge of the positions of field probes in an NMR field camera is necessary for monitoring the B 0 field. The typical method of estimating these positions is by switching the gradients with known strengths and calculating the positions using the phases of the FIDs. We investigated improving the accuracy of estimating the probe positions and analyzed the effect of inaccurate estimations on field monitoring. Methods: The field probe positions were estimated by 1) assuming ideal gradient fields, 2) using measured gradient fields (including nonlinearities), and 3) using measured gradient fields with relative position constraints. The fields measured with the NMR field camera were compared to fields acquired using a dual-echo gradient recalled echo B 0 mapping sequence. Comparisons were done for shim fields from second- to fourth-order shim terms. Results: The position estimation was the most accurate when relative position constraints were used in conjunction with measured (nonlinear) gradient fields. The effect of more accurate position estimates was seen when compared to fields measured using a B 0 mapping sequence (up to 10%–15% more accurate for some shim fields). The models acquired from the field camera are sensitive to noise due to the low number of spatial sample points. Conclusion: Position estimation of field probes in an NMR camera can be improved using relative position constraints and nonlinear gradient fields. Magn Reson Med 80:380–390, 2018.

AB - Purpose: Knowledge of the positions of field probes in an NMR field camera is necessary for monitoring the B 0 field. The typical method of estimating these positions is by switching the gradients with known strengths and calculating the positions using the phases of the FIDs. We investigated improving the accuracy of estimating the probe positions and analyzed the effect of inaccurate estimations on field monitoring. Methods: The field probe positions were estimated by 1) assuming ideal gradient fields, 2) using measured gradient fields (including nonlinearities), and 3) using measured gradient fields with relative position constraints. The fields measured with the NMR field camera were compared to fields acquired using a dual-echo gradient recalled echo B 0 mapping sequence. Comparisons were done for shim fields from second- to fourth-order shim terms. Results: The position estimation was the most accurate when relative position constraints were used in conjunction with measured (nonlinear) gradient fields. The effect of more accurate position estimates was seen when compared to fields measured using a B 0 mapping sequence (up to 10%–15% more accurate for some shim fields). The models acquired from the field camera are sensitive to noise due to the low number of spatial sample points. Conclusion: Position estimation of field probes in an NMR camera can be improved using relative position constraints and nonlinear gradient fields. Magn Reson Med 80:380–390, 2018.

KW - Field monitoring

KW - high order B shim

KW - NMR field camera

KW - NMR field probes

KW - position calibration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034623292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034623292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mrm.27010

DO - 10.1002/mrm.27010

M3 - Article

C2 - 29159823

AN - SCOPUS:85034623292

VL - 80

SP - 380

EP - 390

JO - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

JF - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

SN - 0740-3194

IS - 1

ER -