Construct validity of the LapSim laparoscopic surgical simulator

Derek T. Woodrum, Pamela B. Andreatta, Rajani K. Yellamanchilli, Lauren Feryus, Paul G. Gauger, Rebecca M. Minter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

99 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Computer-aided simulators may increase the safety and efficiency of training in laparoscopic surgery. Before implementation of the Immersion LapSim (Gaithersburg, MD) simulator in our training curriculum, we wished to determine its construct validity (ie, whether the simulator could differentiate laparoscopic novices from trainees with greater experience). Methods: Subjects were medical students (MS), residents (RES), and laparoscopic faculty (FAC). Subjects performed 10 repetitions of 6 LapSim tasks. The LapSim measured performance in 6 to 10 parameters per task, and performance was compared between groups. Post hoc t tests were used to make pair-wise comparisons among the 3 groups using the Bonferroni technique. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. Results: The degree of prior laparoscopic experience was reflected in performance on at least 1 parameter for each task. Several patterns of performance between MS, RES, and FAC were observed. Conclusions: The LapSim has performance parameters that reliably differentiate between subjects with varying laparoscopic experience. However, some performance parameters do not differentiate between groups. To accurately measure a trainee's skill level, only parameters that sensitively measure the true level of performance should be used.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)28-32
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume191
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006

Fingerprint

Medical Students
Medical Faculties
Task Performance and Analysis
Immersion
Curriculum
Laparoscopy
Efficiency
Safety

Keywords

  • Construct validity
  • Laparoscopic simulator
  • Laparoscopy
  • LapSim TM
  • Simulation
  • Surgical education
  • Virtual reality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Woodrum, D. T., Andreatta, P. B., Yellamanchilli, R. K., Feryus, L., Gauger, P. G., & Minter, R. M. (2006). Construct validity of the LapSim laparoscopic surgical simulator. American Journal of Surgery, 191(1), 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.10.018

Construct validity of the LapSim laparoscopic surgical simulator. / Woodrum, Derek T.; Andreatta, Pamela B.; Yellamanchilli, Rajani K.; Feryus, Lauren; Gauger, Paul G.; Minter, Rebecca M.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 191, No. 1, 01.01.2006, p. 28-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Woodrum, DT, Andreatta, PB, Yellamanchilli, RK, Feryus, L, Gauger, PG & Minter, RM 2006, 'Construct validity of the LapSim laparoscopic surgical simulator', American Journal of Surgery, vol. 191, no. 1, pp. 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.10.018
Woodrum DT, Andreatta PB, Yellamanchilli RK, Feryus L, Gauger PG, Minter RM. Construct validity of the LapSim laparoscopic surgical simulator. American Journal of Surgery. 2006 Jan 1;191(1):28-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.10.018
Woodrum, Derek T. ; Andreatta, Pamela B. ; Yellamanchilli, Rajani K. ; Feryus, Lauren ; Gauger, Paul G. ; Minter, Rebecca M. / Construct validity of the LapSim laparoscopic surgical simulator. In: American Journal of Surgery. 2006 ; Vol. 191, No. 1. pp. 28-32.
@article{70e3f77a95e9498e92164f3ddaa687bb,
title = "Construct validity of the LapSim laparoscopic surgical simulator",
abstract = "Background: Computer-aided simulators may increase the safety and efficiency of training in laparoscopic surgery. Before implementation of the Immersion LapSim (Gaithersburg, MD) simulator in our training curriculum, we wished to determine its construct validity (ie, whether the simulator could differentiate laparoscopic novices from trainees with greater experience). Methods: Subjects were medical students (MS), residents (RES), and laparoscopic faculty (FAC). Subjects performed 10 repetitions of 6 LapSim tasks. The LapSim measured performance in 6 to 10 parameters per task, and performance was compared between groups. Post hoc t tests were used to make pair-wise comparisons among the 3 groups using the Bonferroni technique. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. Results: The degree of prior laparoscopic experience was reflected in performance on at least 1 parameter for each task. Several patterns of performance between MS, RES, and FAC were observed. Conclusions: The LapSim has performance parameters that reliably differentiate between subjects with varying laparoscopic experience. However, some performance parameters do not differentiate between groups. To accurately measure a trainee's skill level, only parameters that sensitively measure the true level of performance should be used.",
keywords = "Construct validity, Laparoscopic simulator, Laparoscopy, LapSim TM, Simulation, Surgical education, Virtual reality",
author = "Woodrum, {Derek T.} and Andreatta, {Pamela B.} and Yellamanchilli, {Rajani K.} and Lauren Feryus and Gauger, {Paul G.} and Minter, {Rebecca M.}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.10.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "191",
pages = "28--32",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Construct validity of the LapSim laparoscopic surgical simulator

AU - Woodrum, Derek T.

AU - Andreatta, Pamela B.

AU - Yellamanchilli, Rajani K.

AU - Feryus, Lauren

AU - Gauger, Paul G.

AU - Minter, Rebecca M.

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Background: Computer-aided simulators may increase the safety and efficiency of training in laparoscopic surgery. Before implementation of the Immersion LapSim (Gaithersburg, MD) simulator in our training curriculum, we wished to determine its construct validity (ie, whether the simulator could differentiate laparoscopic novices from trainees with greater experience). Methods: Subjects were medical students (MS), residents (RES), and laparoscopic faculty (FAC). Subjects performed 10 repetitions of 6 LapSim tasks. The LapSim measured performance in 6 to 10 parameters per task, and performance was compared between groups. Post hoc t tests were used to make pair-wise comparisons among the 3 groups using the Bonferroni technique. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. Results: The degree of prior laparoscopic experience was reflected in performance on at least 1 parameter for each task. Several patterns of performance between MS, RES, and FAC were observed. Conclusions: The LapSim has performance parameters that reliably differentiate between subjects with varying laparoscopic experience. However, some performance parameters do not differentiate between groups. To accurately measure a trainee's skill level, only parameters that sensitively measure the true level of performance should be used.

AB - Background: Computer-aided simulators may increase the safety and efficiency of training in laparoscopic surgery. Before implementation of the Immersion LapSim (Gaithersburg, MD) simulator in our training curriculum, we wished to determine its construct validity (ie, whether the simulator could differentiate laparoscopic novices from trainees with greater experience). Methods: Subjects were medical students (MS), residents (RES), and laparoscopic faculty (FAC). Subjects performed 10 repetitions of 6 LapSim tasks. The LapSim measured performance in 6 to 10 parameters per task, and performance was compared between groups. Post hoc t tests were used to make pair-wise comparisons among the 3 groups using the Bonferroni technique. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. Results: The degree of prior laparoscopic experience was reflected in performance on at least 1 parameter for each task. Several patterns of performance between MS, RES, and FAC were observed. Conclusions: The LapSim has performance parameters that reliably differentiate between subjects with varying laparoscopic experience. However, some performance parameters do not differentiate between groups. To accurately measure a trainee's skill level, only parameters that sensitively measure the true level of performance should be used.

KW - Construct validity

KW - Laparoscopic simulator

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - LapSim TM

KW - Simulation

KW - Surgical education

KW - Virtual reality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29944443933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29944443933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.10.018

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.10.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 16399102

AN - SCOPUS:29944443933

VL - 191

SP - 28

EP - 32

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 1

ER -