Contemporary results after sapheno-popliteal bypass for chronic femoral vein occlusion

Dawn M. Coleman, John E. Rectenwald, Frank C. Vandy, Thomas W. Wakefield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Chronic occlusion of the femoral or the proximal popliteal vein responsible for venous obstruction and the constellation of clinical sequelae that ensue remains a surgical challenge that carries notable patient morbidity. Sapheno-popliteal bypass (SPB) remains a surgical reconstructive option for select patients that demonstrate patency of the popliteal vein, great saphenous vein, saphenofemoral junction, and iliac veins. We sought to analyze our single-institution experience with this technique. Methods: A retrospective review of a single-center experience with SPB was performed. Preoperative risk factors and indications for intervention (ie, venous claudication, ulceration) were identified. Duration of follow-up and endpoints, including clinical improvement, wound healing, patency, and limb loss were assessed. A Kaplan-Meier analysis for primary and secondary patency was performed. Results: Seventeen patients underwent SPB for chronic lower extremity venous obstruction between July 1988 and August 2011. Median age at operation was 41 years (range, 23-69 years). There was a male predominance noted (n = 12; 71%). All patients had chronic edema and venous claudication. Five patients (29%) had evidence of venous ulceration preoperatively. Eight patients (47%) underwent a preceding venous intervention (ie, iliac stenting or venous thrombolysis). Three patients had a concomitant arteriovenous fistula, created at the time of bypass to enhance in-flow; three patients underwent concomitant femoral-femoral venous bypass. Four patients (24%) experienced hematoma postoperatively that required operative evacuation; in two patients, compression from this hematoma resulted in early graft occlusion. After a median follow-up of 103 months (range, 3-271 months), 82% of patients experienced near or complete resolution of venous claudication. Three of the five patients with venous ulceration healed their wounds (67%). Of the 16 patients that underwent Duplex scan follow-up, primary patency after a median follow-up of 103 months was 56%, primary-assisted patency was 69%, and secondary patency was 75%. One patient required amputation approximately 21 years after SPB and there were no deaths. This secondary patency rate exceeds previously published patency rates. Conclusions: SPB may be indicated for certain patients with chronic venous stasis disease secondary to femoral venous obstruction that have failed other standard therapies. SPB remains a satisfactory and reliable procedure that produces clinical improvement in a selected group of patients and should be considered in a contemporary venous surgical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-51
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Femoral Vein
Thigh
Popliteal Vein
Hematoma
Iliac Vein
Arteriovenous Fistula
Saphenous Vein
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Amputation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Contemporary results after sapheno-popliteal bypass for chronic femoral vein occlusion. / Coleman, Dawn M.; Rectenwald, John E.; Vandy, Frank C.; Wakefield, Thomas W.

In: Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders, Vol. 1, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 45-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coleman, Dawn M. ; Rectenwald, John E. ; Vandy, Frank C. ; Wakefield, Thomas W. / Contemporary results after sapheno-popliteal bypass for chronic femoral vein occlusion. In: Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 2013 ; Vol. 1, No. 1. pp. 45-51.
@article{ce4358091fd74520822200db29e54bbb,
title = "Contemporary results after sapheno-popliteal bypass for chronic femoral vein occlusion",
abstract = "Background: Chronic occlusion of the femoral or the proximal popliteal vein responsible for venous obstruction and the constellation of clinical sequelae that ensue remains a surgical challenge that carries notable patient morbidity. Sapheno-popliteal bypass (SPB) remains a surgical reconstructive option for select patients that demonstrate patency of the popliteal vein, great saphenous vein, saphenofemoral junction, and iliac veins. We sought to analyze our single-institution experience with this technique. Methods: A retrospective review of a single-center experience with SPB was performed. Preoperative risk factors and indications for intervention (ie, venous claudication, ulceration) were identified. Duration of follow-up and endpoints, including clinical improvement, wound healing, patency, and limb loss were assessed. A Kaplan-Meier analysis for primary and secondary patency was performed. Results: Seventeen patients underwent SPB for chronic lower extremity venous obstruction between July 1988 and August 2011. Median age at operation was 41 years (range, 23-69 years). There was a male predominance noted (n = 12; 71{\%}). All patients had chronic edema and venous claudication. Five patients (29{\%}) had evidence of venous ulceration preoperatively. Eight patients (47{\%}) underwent a preceding venous intervention (ie, iliac stenting or venous thrombolysis). Three patients had a concomitant arteriovenous fistula, created at the time of bypass to enhance in-flow; three patients underwent concomitant femoral-femoral venous bypass. Four patients (24{\%}) experienced hematoma postoperatively that required operative evacuation; in two patients, compression from this hematoma resulted in early graft occlusion. After a median follow-up of 103 months (range, 3-271 months), 82{\%} of patients experienced near or complete resolution of venous claudication. Three of the five patients with venous ulceration healed their wounds (67{\%}). Of the 16 patients that underwent Duplex scan follow-up, primary patency after a median follow-up of 103 months was 56{\%}, primary-assisted patency was 69{\%}, and secondary patency was 75{\%}. One patient required amputation approximately 21 years after SPB and there were no deaths. This secondary patency rate exceeds previously published patency rates. Conclusions: SPB may be indicated for certain patients with chronic venous stasis disease secondary to femoral venous obstruction that have failed other standard therapies. SPB remains a satisfactory and reliable procedure that produces clinical improvement in a selected group of patients and should be considered in a contemporary venous surgical practice.",
author = "Coleman, {Dawn M.} and Rectenwald, {John E.} and Vandy, {Frank C.} and Wakefield, {Thomas W.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvsv.2012.10.055",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "45--51",
journal = "Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders",
issn = "2213-333X",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contemporary results after sapheno-popliteal bypass for chronic femoral vein occlusion

AU - Coleman, Dawn M.

AU - Rectenwald, John E.

AU - Vandy, Frank C.

AU - Wakefield, Thomas W.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Background: Chronic occlusion of the femoral or the proximal popliteal vein responsible for venous obstruction and the constellation of clinical sequelae that ensue remains a surgical challenge that carries notable patient morbidity. Sapheno-popliteal bypass (SPB) remains a surgical reconstructive option for select patients that demonstrate patency of the popliteal vein, great saphenous vein, saphenofemoral junction, and iliac veins. We sought to analyze our single-institution experience with this technique. Methods: A retrospective review of a single-center experience with SPB was performed. Preoperative risk factors and indications for intervention (ie, venous claudication, ulceration) were identified. Duration of follow-up and endpoints, including clinical improvement, wound healing, patency, and limb loss were assessed. A Kaplan-Meier analysis for primary and secondary patency was performed. Results: Seventeen patients underwent SPB for chronic lower extremity venous obstruction between July 1988 and August 2011. Median age at operation was 41 years (range, 23-69 years). There was a male predominance noted (n = 12; 71%). All patients had chronic edema and venous claudication. Five patients (29%) had evidence of venous ulceration preoperatively. Eight patients (47%) underwent a preceding venous intervention (ie, iliac stenting or venous thrombolysis). Three patients had a concomitant arteriovenous fistula, created at the time of bypass to enhance in-flow; three patients underwent concomitant femoral-femoral venous bypass. Four patients (24%) experienced hematoma postoperatively that required operative evacuation; in two patients, compression from this hematoma resulted in early graft occlusion. After a median follow-up of 103 months (range, 3-271 months), 82% of patients experienced near or complete resolution of venous claudication. Three of the five patients with venous ulceration healed their wounds (67%). Of the 16 patients that underwent Duplex scan follow-up, primary patency after a median follow-up of 103 months was 56%, primary-assisted patency was 69%, and secondary patency was 75%. One patient required amputation approximately 21 years after SPB and there were no deaths. This secondary patency rate exceeds previously published patency rates. Conclusions: SPB may be indicated for certain patients with chronic venous stasis disease secondary to femoral venous obstruction that have failed other standard therapies. SPB remains a satisfactory and reliable procedure that produces clinical improvement in a selected group of patients and should be considered in a contemporary venous surgical practice.

AB - Background: Chronic occlusion of the femoral or the proximal popliteal vein responsible for venous obstruction and the constellation of clinical sequelae that ensue remains a surgical challenge that carries notable patient morbidity. Sapheno-popliteal bypass (SPB) remains a surgical reconstructive option for select patients that demonstrate patency of the popliteal vein, great saphenous vein, saphenofemoral junction, and iliac veins. We sought to analyze our single-institution experience with this technique. Methods: A retrospective review of a single-center experience with SPB was performed. Preoperative risk factors and indications for intervention (ie, venous claudication, ulceration) were identified. Duration of follow-up and endpoints, including clinical improvement, wound healing, patency, and limb loss were assessed. A Kaplan-Meier analysis for primary and secondary patency was performed. Results: Seventeen patients underwent SPB for chronic lower extremity venous obstruction between July 1988 and August 2011. Median age at operation was 41 years (range, 23-69 years). There was a male predominance noted (n = 12; 71%). All patients had chronic edema and venous claudication. Five patients (29%) had evidence of venous ulceration preoperatively. Eight patients (47%) underwent a preceding venous intervention (ie, iliac stenting or venous thrombolysis). Three patients had a concomitant arteriovenous fistula, created at the time of bypass to enhance in-flow; three patients underwent concomitant femoral-femoral venous bypass. Four patients (24%) experienced hematoma postoperatively that required operative evacuation; in two patients, compression from this hematoma resulted in early graft occlusion. After a median follow-up of 103 months (range, 3-271 months), 82% of patients experienced near or complete resolution of venous claudication. Three of the five patients with venous ulceration healed their wounds (67%). Of the 16 patients that underwent Duplex scan follow-up, primary patency after a median follow-up of 103 months was 56%, primary-assisted patency was 69%, and secondary patency was 75%. One patient required amputation approximately 21 years after SPB and there were no deaths. This secondary patency rate exceeds previously published patency rates. Conclusions: SPB may be indicated for certain patients with chronic venous stasis disease secondary to femoral venous obstruction that have failed other standard therapies. SPB remains a satisfactory and reliable procedure that produces clinical improvement in a selected group of patients and should be considered in a contemporary venous surgical practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878048941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878048941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvsv.2012.10.055

DO - 10.1016/j.jvsv.2012.10.055

M3 - Article

C2 - 26993893

AN - SCOPUS:84878048941

VL - 1

SP - 45

EP - 51

JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders

JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders

SN - 2213-333X

IS - 1

ER -