Contraception or abortion? Inaccurate descriptions of emergency contraception in newspaper articles, 1992-2002

Sandi L. Pruitt, Patricia Dolan Mullen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Media portrayals of emergency contraception (EC) may influence public health policy and the public's acceptance of this reproductive health option. Objectives: We investigated the accuracy of newspaper coverage of EC, 1992-2002. Methods: We conducted a content analysis of a sample of 1077 articles in 113 newspapers discussing both EC and abortion and determined the frequency of confusion between the two. Results: Of all articles, 44.5% (n=479) included at least one instance of confusion between EC and medical abortion. Inaccurate portrayal of the mode of action of EC as medical abortion occurred in 31.8% (n=343) of articles; 13.1% (n=141) inappropriately applied terms such as "abortifacient postcoital contraceptives" for EC. Conclusions: Errors were prevalent, persisted over time and may have contributed to incorrect beliefs about a form of contraception that is used infrequently, despite its potential to deter unintended pregnancy and abortion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)14-21
Number of pages8
JournalContraception
Volume71
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2005

Fingerprint

Postcoital Contraception
Newspapers
Contraception
Postcoital Contraceptives
Abortifacient Agents
Reproductive Health
Public Policy
Health Policy
Public Health
Pregnancy

Keywords

  • Content analysis
  • Emergency contraception (EC)
  • Media
  • Medical abortion
  • Newspapers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Contraception or abortion? Inaccurate descriptions of emergency contraception in newspaper articles, 1992-2002. / Pruitt, Sandi L.; Mullen, Patricia Dolan.

In: Contraception, Vol. 71, No. 1, 01.2005, p. 14-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{69bea1dbc11d47debc3c33304897d11d,
title = "Contraception or abortion? Inaccurate descriptions of emergency contraception in newspaper articles, 1992-2002",
abstract = "Background: Media portrayals of emergency contraception (EC) may influence public health policy and the public's acceptance of this reproductive health option. Objectives: We investigated the accuracy of newspaper coverage of EC, 1992-2002. Methods: We conducted a content analysis of a sample of 1077 articles in 113 newspapers discussing both EC and abortion and determined the frequency of confusion between the two. Results: Of all articles, 44.5{\%} (n=479) included at least one instance of confusion between EC and medical abortion. Inaccurate portrayal of the mode of action of EC as medical abortion occurred in 31.8{\%} (n=343) of articles; 13.1{\%} (n=141) inappropriately applied terms such as {"}abortifacient postcoital contraceptives{"} for EC. Conclusions: Errors were prevalent, persisted over time and may have contributed to incorrect beliefs about a form of contraception that is used infrequently, despite its potential to deter unintended pregnancy and abortion.",
keywords = "Content analysis, Emergency contraception (EC), Media, Medical abortion, Newspapers",
author = "Pruitt, {Sandi L.} and Mullen, {Patricia Dolan}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.contraception.2004.07.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "14--21",
journal = "Contraception",
issn = "0010-7824",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contraception or abortion? Inaccurate descriptions of emergency contraception in newspaper articles, 1992-2002

AU - Pruitt, Sandi L.

AU - Mullen, Patricia Dolan

PY - 2005/1

Y1 - 2005/1

N2 - Background: Media portrayals of emergency contraception (EC) may influence public health policy and the public's acceptance of this reproductive health option. Objectives: We investigated the accuracy of newspaper coverage of EC, 1992-2002. Methods: We conducted a content analysis of a sample of 1077 articles in 113 newspapers discussing both EC and abortion and determined the frequency of confusion between the two. Results: Of all articles, 44.5% (n=479) included at least one instance of confusion between EC and medical abortion. Inaccurate portrayal of the mode of action of EC as medical abortion occurred in 31.8% (n=343) of articles; 13.1% (n=141) inappropriately applied terms such as "abortifacient postcoital contraceptives" for EC. Conclusions: Errors were prevalent, persisted over time and may have contributed to incorrect beliefs about a form of contraception that is used infrequently, despite its potential to deter unintended pregnancy and abortion.

AB - Background: Media portrayals of emergency contraception (EC) may influence public health policy and the public's acceptance of this reproductive health option. Objectives: We investigated the accuracy of newspaper coverage of EC, 1992-2002. Methods: We conducted a content analysis of a sample of 1077 articles in 113 newspapers discussing both EC and abortion and determined the frequency of confusion between the two. Results: Of all articles, 44.5% (n=479) included at least one instance of confusion between EC and medical abortion. Inaccurate portrayal of the mode of action of EC as medical abortion occurred in 31.8% (n=343) of articles; 13.1% (n=141) inappropriately applied terms such as "abortifacient postcoital contraceptives" for EC. Conclusions: Errors were prevalent, persisted over time and may have contributed to incorrect beliefs about a form of contraception that is used infrequently, despite its potential to deter unintended pregnancy and abortion.

KW - Content analysis

KW - Emergency contraception (EC)

KW - Media

KW - Medical abortion

KW - Newspapers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27144553759&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27144553759&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.07.012

DO - 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.07.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 15639066

AN - SCOPUS:27144553759

VL - 71

SP - 14

EP - 21

JO - Contraception

JF - Contraception

SN - 0010-7824

IS - 1

ER -