Contrast-induced nephropathy: Current practices among cardiologists

Mohamad N. Alhosaini, Shadi Latta, Kamran Riaz, Tamim Hamdi, Bassel Jallad, Fayez Kheir, Sook Park, Nkemakolam Iroegbu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a serious complication of diagnostic and therapeutic coronary angiography. There are an increasing number of guidelines in the literature to help lessen this complication. Practice patterns in the cardiology community remain relatively unknown. This survey is an effort to better understand such practices. Methods: Questions were written based on the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) guidelines to identify cardiologist background and experience. The survey was emailed to 5000 randomly chosen cardiologists in December 2009. Results: A total of 291 responses were received. Among these, 97% reported checking renal function in all patients prior to angiography, 45% checked both estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine (SCr), 31% checked SCr alone, 19% checked eGFR alone, and 2% checked albumin-to-creatinine (A-C) ratio. Among responding cardiologists, 70% considered eGFR level less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 a high risk for CIN whereas 25% considered a level less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 a high risk. Thirty percent used only isosmolar media in high-risk patients, 33% used only low osmolar media, and 37% used either one. Conclusions: There is significant diversity in the measures taken by cardiologists to prevent CIN. More studies and clearer guidelines are needed to unify the practices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)928-934
Number of pages7
JournalRenal Failure
Volume32
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

Glomerular Filtration Rate
Creatinine
Guidelines
Angiography
Cardiology
Coronary Angiography
Serum
Albumins
Kidney
Cardiologists
Surveys and Questionnaires
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Contrast-induced nephropathy
  • Coronary angiography
  • Guidelines
  • Prevention
  • Screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Alhosaini, M. N., Latta, S., Riaz, K., Hamdi, T., Jallad, B., Kheir, F., ... Iroegbu, N. (2010). Contrast-induced nephropathy: Current practices among cardiologists. Renal Failure, 32(8), 928-934. https://doi.org/10.3109/0886022X.2010.502280

Contrast-induced nephropathy : Current practices among cardiologists. / Alhosaini, Mohamad N.; Latta, Shadi; Riaz, Kamran; Hamdi, Tamim; Jallad, Bassel; Kheir, Fayez; Park, Sook; Iroegbu, Nkemakolam.

In: Renal Failure, Vol. 32, No. 8, 09.2010, p. 928-934.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Alhosaini, MN, Latta, S, Riaz, K, Hamdi, T, Jallad, B, Kheir, F, Park, S & Iroegbu, N 2010, 'Contrast-induced nephropathy: Current practices among cardiologists', Renal Failure, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 928-934. https://doi.org/10.3109/0886022X.2010.502280
Alhosaini, Mohamad N. ; Latta, Shadi ; Riaz, Kamran ; Hamdi, Tamim ; Jallad, Bassel ; Kheir, Fayez ; Park, Sook ; Iroegbu, Nkemakolam. / Contrast-induced nephropathy : Current practices among cardiologists. In: Renal Failure. 2010 ; Vol. 32, No. 8. pp. 928-934.
@article{29a9b4aa34bb46fba898f292295d2f65,
title = "Contrast-induced nephropathy: Current practices among cardiologists",
abstract = "Objective: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a serious complication of diagnostic and therapeutic coronary angiography. There are an increasing number of guidelines in the literature to help lessen this complication. Practice patterns in the cardiology community remain relatively unknown. This survey is an effort to better understand such practices. Methods: Questions were written based on the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) guidelines to identify cardiologist background and experience. The survey was emailed to 5000 randomly chosen cardiologists in December 2009. Results: A total of 291 responses were received. Among these, 97{\%} reported checking renal function in all patients prior to angiography, 45{\%} checked both estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine (SCr), 31{\%} checked SCr alone, 19{\%} checked eGFR alone, and 2{\%} checked albumin-to-creatinine (A-C) ratio. Among responding cardiologists, 70{\%} considered eGFR level less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 a high risk for CIN whereas 25{\%} considered a level less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 a high risk. Thirty percent used only isosmolar media in high-risk patients, 33{\%} used only low osmolar media, and 37{\%} used either one. Conclusions: There is significant diversity in the measures taken by cardiologists to prevent CIN. More studies and clearer guidelines are needed to unify the practices.",
keywords = "Contrast-induced nephropathy, Coronary angiography, Guidelines, Prevention, Screening",
author = "Alhosaini, {Mohamad N.} and Shadi Latta and Kamran Riaz and Tamim Hamdi and Bassel Jallad and Fayez Kheir and Sook Park and Nkemakolam Iroegbu",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.3109/0886022X.2010.502280",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "928--934",
journal = "Renal Failure",
issn = "0886-022X",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contrast-induced nephropathy

T2 - Current practices among cardiologists

AU - Alhosaini, Mohamad N.

AU - Latta, Shadi

AU - Riaz, Kamran

AU - Hamdi, Tamim

AU - Jallad, Bassel

AU - Kheir, Fayez

AU - Park, Sook

AU - Iroegbu, Nkemakolam

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - Objective: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a serious complication of diagnostic and therapeutic coronary angiography. There are an increasing number of guidelines in the literature to help lessen this complication. Practice patterns in the cardiology community remain relatively unknown. This survey is an effort to better understand such practices. Methods: Questions were written based on the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) guidelines to identify cardiologist background and experience. The survey was emailed to 5000 randomly chosen cardiologists in December 2009. Results: A total of 291 responses were received. Among these, 97% reported checking renal function in all patients prior to angiography, 45% checked both estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine (SCr), 31% checked SCr alone, 19% checked eGFR alone, and 2% checked albumin-to-creatinine (A-C) ratio. Among responding cardiologists, 70% considered eGFR level less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 a high risk for CIN whereas 25% considered a level less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 a high risk. Thirty percent used only isosmolar media in high-risk patients, 33% used only low osmolar media, and 37% used either one. Conclusions: There is significant diversity in the measures taken by cardiologists to prevent CIN. More studies and clearer guidelines are needed to unify the practices.

AB - Objective: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a serious complication of diagnostic and therapeutic coronary angiography. There are an increasing number of guidelines in the literature to help lessen this complication. Practice patterns in the cardiology community remain relatively unknown. This survey is an effort to better understand such practices. Methods: Questions were written based on the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) guidelines to identify cardiologist background and experience. The survey was emailed to 5000 randomly chosen cardiologists in December 2009. Results: A total of 291 responses were received. Among these, 97% reported checking renal function in all patients prior to angiography, 45% checked both estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine (SCr), 31% checked SCr alone, 19% checked eGFR alone, and 2% checked albumin-to-creatinine (A-C) ratio. Among responding cardiologists, 70% considered eGFR level less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 a high risk for CIN whereas 25% considered a level less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 a high risk. Thirty percent used only isosmolar media in high-risk patients, 33% used only low osmolar media, and 37% used either one. Conclusions: There is significant diversity in the measures taken by cardiologists to prevent CIN. More studies and clearer guidelines are needed to unify the practices.

KW - Contrast-induced nephropathy

KW - Coronary angiography

KW - Guidelines

KW - Prevention

KW - Screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955967465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955967465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/0886022X.2010.502280

DO - 10.3109/0886022X.2010.502280

M3 - Article

C2 - 20722559

AN - SCOPUS:77955967465

VL - 32

SP - 928

EP - 934

JO - Renal Failure

JF - Renal Failure

SN - 0886-022X

IS - 8

ER -