Copas-like selection model to correct publication bias in systematic review of diagnostic test studies

Jin Piao, Yulun Liu, Yong Chen, Jing Ning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The accuracy of a diagnostic test, which is often quantified by a pair of measures such as sensitivity and specificity, is critical for medical decision making. Separate studies of an investigational diagnostic test can be combined through meta-analysis; however, such an analysis can be threatened by publication bias. To the best of our knowledge, there is no existing method that accounts for publication bias in the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests involving bivariate outcomes. In this paper, we extend the Copas selection model from univariate outcomes to bivariate outcomes for the correction of publication bias when the probability of a study being published can depend on its sensitivity, specificity, and the associated standard errors. We develop an expectation-maximization algorithm for the maximum likelihood estimation under the proposed selection model. We investigate the finite sample performance of the proposed method through simulation studies and illustrate the method by assessing a meta-analysis of 17 published studies of a rapid diagnostic test for influenza.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2912-2923
Number of pages12
JournalStatistical Methods in Medical Research
Volume28
Issue number10-11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Publication Bias
Diagnostic Tests
Selection Model
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Meta-Analysis
Specificity
Sensitivity and Specificity
Influenza
Expectation-maximization Algorithm
Standard error
Maximum Likelihood Estimation
Human Influenza
Univariate
Decision Making
Simulation Study
Review

Keywords

  • Copas selection model
  • diagnostic test accuracy
  • linear mixed model
  • meta-analysis
  • systematic reviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

Copas-like selection model to correct publication bias in systematic review of diagnostic test studies. / Piao, Jin; Liu, Yulun; Chen, Yong; Ning, Jing.

In: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 28, No. 10-11, 01.11.2019, p. 2912-2923.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dcd35e0f09c1484cbb98cabeaf9cd882,
title = "Copas-like selection model to correct publication bias in systematic review of diagnostic test studies",
abstract = "The accuracy of a diagnostic test, which is often quantified by a pair of measures such as sensitivity and specificity, is critical for medical decision making. Separate studies of an investigational diagnostic test can be combined through meta-analysis; however, such an analysis can be threatened by publication bias. To the best of our knowledge, there is no existing method that accounts for publication bias in the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests involving bivariate outcomes. In this paper, we extend the Copas selection model from univariate outcomes to bivariate outcomes for the correction of publication bias when the probability of a study being published can depend on its sensitivity, specificity, and the associated standard errors. We develop an expectation-maximization algorithm for the maximum likelihood estimation under the proposed selection model. We investigate the finite sample performance of the proposed method through simulation studies and illustrate the method by assessing a meta-analysis of 17 published studies of a rapid diagnostic test for influenza.",
keywords = "Copas selection model, diagnostic test accuracy, linear mixed model, meta-analysis, systematic reviews",
author = "Jin Piao and Yulun Liu and Yong Chen and Jing Ning",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0962280218791602",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "2912--2923",
journal = "Statistical Methods in Medical Research",
issn = "0962-2802",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "10-11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Copas-like selection model to correct publication bias in systematic review of diagnostic test studies

AU - Piao, Jin

AU - Liu, Yulun

AU - Chen, Yong

AU - Ning, Jing

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - The accuracy of a diagnostic test, which is often quantified by a pair of measures such as sensitivity and specificity, is critical for medical decision making. Separate studies of an investigational diagnostic test can be combined through meta-analysis; however, such an analysis can be threatened by publication bias. To the best of our knowledge, there is no existing method that accounts for publication bias in the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests involving bivariate outcomes. In this paper, we extend the Copas selection model from univariate outcomes to bivariate outcomes for the correction of publication bias when the probability of a study being published can depend on its sensitivity, specificity, and the associated standard errors. We develop an expectation-maximization algorithm for the maximum likelihood estimation under the proposed selection model. We investigate the finite sample performance of the proposed method through simulation studies and illustrate the method by assessing a meta-analysis of 17 published studies of a rapid diagnostic test for influenza.

AB - The accuracy of a diagnostic test, which is often quantified by a pair of measures such as sensitivity and specificity, is critical for medical decision making. Separate studies of an investigational diagnostic test can be combined through meta-analysis; however, such an analysis can be threatened by publication bias. To the best of our knowledge, there is no existing method that accounts for publication bias in the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests involving bivariate outcomes. In this paper, we extend the Copas selection model from univariate outcomes to bivariate outcomes for the correction of publication bias when the probability of a study being published can depend on its sensitivity, specificity, and the associated standard errors. We develop an expectation-maximization algorithm for the maximum likelihood estimation under the proposed selection model. We investigate the finite sample performance of the proposed method through simulation studies and illustrate the method by assessing a meta-analysis of 17 published studies of a rapid diagnostic test for influenza.

KW - Copas selection model

KW - diagnostic test accuracy

KW - linear mixed model

KW - meta-analysis

KW - systematic reviews

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052312279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052312279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0962280218791602

DO - 10.1177/0962280218791602

M3 - Article

C2 - 30062910

AN - SCOPUS:85052312279

VL - 28

SP - 2912

EP - 2923

JO - Statistical Methods in Medical Research

JF - Statistical Methods in Medical Research

SN - 0962-2802

IS - 10-11

ER -