Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography

Tej Sheth, Jonathan D. Dodd, Udo Hoffmann, Suhny Abbara, Aloke Finn, Herman K. Gold, Thomas J. Brady, Ricardo C. Cury

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the assessability of contemporary stent platforms by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). Methods: Patients undergoing coronary stenting were included in a prospective protocol of MDCT imaging within 48 hr of stent implantation. MDCT data were acquired using a "Sensation 64" MDCT scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany). Stent assessability was assessed by two independent blinded observers and disagreement was resolved by a third observer. Assessability was defined at visualization of the in-stent lumen without influence of partial volume effects, beam hardening, motion, calcification, or contrast to noise limitations. Results: Fifty four stents (Cypher n = 25, Vision/Minivision n = 19, Taxus Express n = 8, Liberie n = 1, Driver n = 1) in 44 patients were included in the study. The two independent observers classified 30 of 54 stents (56%) as assessable. Interobserver reproducibility was good with κ = 0.66. Stent size was the most important determinant of assessability. Consistently assessable stents were 3.0 mm or larger (85%), whereas those under 3 mm were mostly nonassessable (26%). Conclusions: Contemporary stent designs evaluated on a 64-slice MDCT scanner showed artifact free assessability only in larger stents. Increase in spatial resolution of MDCT scanners or modifications in stent design will be necessary to noninvasive evaluate stents <3 mm in diameter, where in-stent restenosis is more frequent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)933-938
Number of pages6
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume69
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2007

Fingerprint

Stents
Tomography
X-Ray Computed Tomography Scanners
Taxus
Artifacts
Germany
Noise

Keywords

  • Computed tomography
  • Coronary stents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography. / Sheth, Tej; Dodd, Jonathan D.; Hoffmann, Udo; Abbara, Suhny; Finn, Aloke; Gold, Herman K.; Brady, Thomas J.; Cury, Ricardo C.

In: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, Vol. 69, No. 7, 01.06.2007, p. 933-938.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sheth, T, Dodd, JD, Hoffmann, U, Abbara, S, Finn, A, Gold, HK, Brady, TJ & Cury, RC 2007, 'Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography', Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 933-938. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.21130
Sheth, Tej ; Dodd, Jonathan D. ; Hoffmann, Udo ; Abbara, Suhny ; Finn, Aloke ; Gold, Herman K. ; Brady, Thomas J. ; Cury, Ricardo C. / Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography. In: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2007 ; Vol. 69, No. 7. pp. 933-938.
@article{a03a2b17146d4c8385ff2f50e903901b,
title = "Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography",
abstract = "Background: We evaluated the assessability of contemporary stent platforms by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). Methods: Patients undergoing coronary stenting were included in a prospective protocol of MDCT imaging within 48 hr of stent implantation. MDCT data were acquired using a {"}Sensation 64{"} MDCT scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany). Stent assessability was assessed by two independent blinded observers and disagreement was resolved by a third observer. Assessability was defined at visualization of the in-stent lumen without influence of partial volume effects, beam hardening, motion, calcification, or contrast to noise limitations. Results: Fifty four stents (Cypher n = 25, Vision/Minivision n = 19, Taxus Express n = 8, Liberie n = 1, Driver n = 1) in 44 patients were included in the study. The two independent observers classified 30 of 54 stents (56{\%}) as assessable. Interobserver reproducibility was good with κ = 0.66. Stent size was the most important determinant of assessability. Consistently assessable stents were 3.0 mm or larger (85{\%}), whereas those under 3 mm were mostly nonassessable (26{\%}). Conclusions: Contemporary stent designs evaluated on a 64-slice MDCT scanner showed artifact free assessability only in larger stents. Increase in spatial resolution of MDCT scanners or modifications in stent design will be necessary to noninvasive evaluate stents <3 mm in diameter, where in-stent restenosis is more frequent.",
keywords = "Computed tomography, Coronary stents",
author = "Tej Sheth and Dodd, {Jonathan D.} and Udo Hoffmann and Suhny Abbara and Aloke Finn and Gold, {Herman K.} and Brady, {Thomas J.} and Cury, {Ricardo C.}",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ccd.21130",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "933--938",
journal = "Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions",
issn = "1522-1946",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography

AU - Sheth, Tej

AU - Dodd, Jonathan D.

AU - Hoffmann, Udo

AU - Abbara, Suhny

AU - Finn, Aloke

AU - Gold, Herman K.

AU - Brady, Thomas J.

AU - Cury, Ricardo C.

PY - 2007/6/1

Y1 - 2007/6/1

N2 - Background: We evaluated the assessability of contemporary stent platforms by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). Methods: Patients undergoing coronary stenting were included in a prospective protocol of MDCT imaging within 48 hr of stent implantation. MDCT data were acquired using a "Sensation 64" MDCT scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany). Stent assessability was assessed by two independent blinded observers and disagreement was resolved by a third observer. Assessability was defined at visualization of the in-stent lumen without influence of partial volume effects, beam hardening, motion, calcification, or contrast to noise limitations. Results: Fifty four stents (Cypher n = 25, Vision/Minivision n = 19, Taxus Express n = 8, Liberie n = 1, Driver n = 1) in 44 patients were included in the study. The two independent observers classified 30 of 54 stents (56%) as assessable. Interobserver reproducibility was good with κ = 0.66. Stent size was the most important determinant of assessability. Consistently assessable stents were 3.0 mm or larger (85%), whereas those under 3 mm were mostly nonassessable (26%). Conclusions: Contemporary stent designs evaluated on a 64-slice MDCT scanner showed artifact free assessability only in larger stents. Increase in spatial resolution of MDCT scanners or modifications in stent design will be necessary to noninvasive evaluate stents <3 mm in diameter, where in-stent restenosis is more frequent.

AB - Background: We evaluated the assessability of contemporary stent platforms by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). Methods: Patients undergoing coronary stenting were included in a prospective protocol of MDCT imaging within 48 hr of stent implantation. MDCT data were acquired using a "Sensation 64" MDCT scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany). Stent assessability was assessed by two independent blinded observers and disagreement was resolved by a third observer. Assessability was defined at visualization of the in-stent lumen without influence of partial volume effects, beam hardening, motion, calcification, or contrast to noise limitations. Results: Fifty four stents (Cypher n = 25, Vision/Minivision n = 19, Taxus Express n = 8, Liberie n = 1, Driver n = 1) in 44 patients were included in the study. The two independent observers classified 30 of 54 stents (56%) as assessable. Interobserver reproducibility was good with κ = 0.66. Stent size was the most important determinant of assessability. Consistently assessable stents were 3.0 mm or larger (85%), whereas those under 3 mm were mostly nonassessable (26%). Conclusions: Contemporary stent designs evaluated on a 64-slice MDCT scanner showed artifact free assessability only in larger stents. Increase in spatial resolution of MDCT scanners or modifications in stent design will be necessary to noninvasive evaluate stents <3 mm in diameter, where in-stent restenosis is more frequent.

KW - Computed tomography

KW - Coronary stents

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250176499&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250176499&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ccd.21130

DO - 10.1002/ccd.21130

M3 - Article

C2 - 17421013

AN - SCOPUS:34250176499

VL - 69

SP - 933

EP - 938

JO - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

SN - 1522-1946

IS - 7

ER -