Coronary vessel wall contrast enhancement imaging as a potential direct marker of coronary involvement: Integration of findings from CAD and SLE patients

Niharika Varma, Rocio Hinojar, David D'Cruz, Eduardo Arroyo Ucar, Andreas Indermuehle, Sarah Peel, Gerald Greil, Nicholas Gaddum, Phil Chowienczyk, Eike Nagel, Rene M. Botnar, Valentina O. Puntmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives This study investigated the feasibility of visual and quantitative assessment of coronary vessel wall contrast enhancement (CE) for detection of symptomatic atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD) and subclinical coronary vasculitis in autoimmune inflammatory disease (systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE]), as well as the association with aortic stiffness, an established marker of risk. Background Coronary CE by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is a novel noninvasive approach to visualize gadolinium contrast uptake within the coronary artery vessel wall. Methods A total of 75 subjects (CAD: n = 25; SLE: n = 27; control: n = 23) underwent CMR imaging using a 3-T clinical scanner. Coronary arteries were visualized by a T2-prepared steady state free precession technique. Coronary wall CE was visualized using inversion-recovery T1 weighted gradient echo sequence 40 min after administration of 0.2 mmol/kg gadobutrol. Proximal coronary segments were visually examined for distribution of CE and quantified for contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and total CE area. Results Coronary CE was prevalent in patients (93%, n = 42) with a diffuse pattern for SLE and a patchy/regional distribution in CAD patients. Compared with control subjects, CNR values and total CE area in patients with CAD and SLE were significantly higher (mean CNR: 3.9 ± 2.5 vs. 6.9 ± 2.5 vs. 6.8 ± 2.0, respectively; p < 0.001; total CE area: median 0.8 [interquartile range (IQR): 0.6 to 1.2] vs. 3.2 [IQR: 2.6 to 4.0] vs. 3.3 [IQR: 1.9 to 4.5], respectively; p < 0.001). Both measures were positively associated with aortic stiffness (CNR: r = 0.61, p < 0.01; total CE area: 0.36, p = 0.03), hypercholesterolemia (r = 0.68, p < 0.001; r = 0.61, p < 0.001) and hypertension (r = 0.40, p < 0.01; r = 0.32, p < 0.05). Conclusions We demonstrate that quantification of coronary CE by CNR and total CE area is feasible for detection of subclinical and clinical uptake of gadolinium within the coronary vessel wall. Coronary vessel wall CE may become an instrumental novel direct marker of vessel wall injury and remodeling in subpopulations at risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)762-770
Number of pages9
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
Volume7
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2014

Keywords

  • cardiac magnetic resonance
  • contrast-to-noise ratio
  • coronary enhancement
  • vessel wall remodeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Coronary vessel wall contrast enhancement imaging as a potential direct marker of coronary involvement: Integration of findings from CAD and SLE patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Varma, N., Hinojar, R., D'Cruz, D., Arroyo Ucar, E., Indermuehle, A., Peel, S., Greil, G., Gaddum, N., Chowienczyk, P., Nagel, E., Botnar, R. M., & Puntmann, V. O. (2014). Coronary vessel wall contrast enhancement imaging as a potential direct marker of coronary involvement: Integration of findings from CAD and SLE patients. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 7(8), 762-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.03.012