Correlation between dosimetric effect and intrafraction motion during prostate treatments delivered with helical tomotherapy

Katja M. Langen, Weiguo Lu, Wilfred Ngwa, Twyla R. Willoughby, Bhavin Chauhan, Sanford L. Meeks, Patrick A. Kupelian, Gustavo Olivera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The dosimetric impact of intrafraction prostate motion was investigated for helical tomotherapy treatments. Measured motion tracks were used to calculate the dosimetric impact on delivered target dose distributions. A dynamic dose calculation engine was developed to facilitate this evaluation. It was found that the D95% (minimum dose to 95% of the volume) changes in the prostate were well correlated with D95% changes in the PTV. This means that the dosimetric impact of intrafraction motion is not restricted to the periphery of the target. The amount of motion was not well correlated with the dosimetric impact (measured in target D95% changes) of motion. The relationship between motion and its dosimetric impact is complex and depends on the timing and direction of the movement. These findings have implications for motion management techniques. It appears that the use of target margins is not an effective strategy to protect the prostate from the effects of observed intrafraction motion. The complex relationship between motion and its dosimetric effect renders simple threshold-based intervention schemes inefficient. Monitoring of actual prostate motion would allow the documentation of the dosimetric impact and implementation of corrective action if needed. However, when motion management techniques are evaluated, it should be kept in mind that the dosimetric impact of observed prostate motion is small for the majority of fractions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7073-7086
Number of pages14
JournalPhysics in Medicine and Biology
Volume53
Issue number24
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 21 2008

Fingerprint

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Prostate
Therapeutics
Documentation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Correlation between dosimetric effect and intrafraction motion during prostate treatments delivered with helical tomotherapy. / Langen, Katja M.; Lu, Weiguo; Ngwa, Wilfred; Willoughby, Twyla R.; Chauhan, Bhavin; Meeks, Sanford L.; Kupelian, Patrick A.; Olivera, Gustavo.

In: Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 53, No. 24, 21.12.2008, p. 7073-7086.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Langen, Katja M. ; Lu, Weiguo ; Ngwa, Wilfred ; Willoughby, Twyla R. ; Chauhan, Bhavin ; Meeks, Sanford L. ; Kupelian, Patrick A. ; Olivera, Gustavo. / Correlation between dosimetric effect and intrafraction motion during prostate treatments delivered with helical tomotherapy. In: Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2008 ; Vol. 53, No. 24. pp. 7073-7086.
@article{27ac14e4a17d4400a79d8a29a091961b,
title = "Correlation between dosimetric effect and intrafraction motion during prostate treatments delivered with helical tomotherapy",
abstract = "The dosimetric impact of intrafraction prostate motion was investigated for helical tomotherapy treatments. Measured motion tracks were used to calculate the dosimetric impact on delivered target dose distributions. A dynamic dose calculation engine was developed to facilitate this evaluation. It was found that the D95{\%} (minimum dose to 95{\%} of the volume) changes in the prostate were well correlated with D95{\%} changes in the PTV. This means that the dosimetric impact of intrafraction motion is not restricted to the periphery of the target. The amount of motion was not well correlated with the dosimetric impact (measured in target D95{\%} changes) of motion. The relationship between motion and its dosimetric impact is complex and depends on the timing and direction of the movement. These findings have implications for motion management techniques. It appears that the use of target margins is not an effective strategy to protect the prostate from the effects of observed intrafraction motion. The complex relationship between motion and its dosimetric effect renders simple threshold-based intervention schemes inefficient. Monitoring of actual prostate motion would allow the documentation of the dosimetric impact and implementation of corrective action if needed. However, when motion management techniques are evaluated, it should be kept in mind that the dosimetric impact of observed prostate motion is small for the majority of fractions.",
author = "Langen, {Katja M.} and Weiguo Lu and Wilfred Ngwa and Willoughby, {Twyla R.} and Bhavin Chauhan and Meeks, {Sanford L.} and Kupelian, {Patrick A.} and Gustavo Olivera",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1088/0031-9155/53/24/005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "7073--7086",
journal = "Physics in Medicine and Biology",
issn = "0031-9155",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "24",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correlation between dosimetric effect and intrafraction motion during prostate treatments delivered with helical tomotherapy

AU - Langen, Katja M.

AU - Lu, Weiguo

AU - Ngwa, Wilfred

AU - Willoughby, Twyla R.

AU - Chauhan, Bhavin

AU - Meeks, Sanford L.

AU - Kupelian, Patrick A.

AU - Olivera, Gustavo

PY - 2008/12/21

Y1 - 2008/12/21

N2 - The dosimetric impact of intrafraction prostate motion was investigated for helical tomotherapy treatments. Measured motion tracks were used to calculate the dosimetric impact on delivered target dose distributions. A dynamic dose calculation engine was developed to facilitate this evaluation. It was found that the D95% (minimum dose to 95% of the volume) changes in the prostate were well correlated with D95% changes in the PTV. This means that the dosimetric impact of intrafraction motion is not restricted to the periphery of the target. The amount of motion was not well correlated with the dosimetric impact (measured in target D95% changes) of motion. The relationship between motion and its dosimetric impact is complex and depends on the timing and direction of the movement. These findings have implications for motion management techniques. It appears that the use of target margins is not an effective strategy to protect the prostate from the effects of observed intrafraction motion. The complex relationship between motion and its dosimetric effect renders simple threshold-based intervention schemes inefficient. Monitoring of actual prostate motion would allow the documentation of the dosimetric impact and implementation of corrective action if needed. However, when motion management techniques are evaluated, it should be kept in mind that the dosimetric impact of observed prostate motion is small for the majority of fractions.

AB - The dosimetric impact of intrafraction prostate motion was investigated for helical tomotherapy treatments. Measured motion tracks were used to calculate the dosimetric impact on delivered target dose distributions. A dynamic dose calculation engine was developed to facilitate this evaluation. It was found that the D95% (minimum dose to 95% of the volume) changes in the prostate were well correlated with D95% changes in the PTV. This means that the dosimetric impact of intrafraction motion is not restricted to the periphery of the target. The amount of motion was not well correlated with the dosimetric impact (measured in target D95% changes) of motion. The relationship between motion and its dosimetric impact is complex and depends on the timing and direction of the movement. These findings have implications for motion management techniques. It appears that the use of target margins is not an effective strategy to protect the prostate from the effects of observed intrafraction motion. The complex relationship between motion and its dosimetric effect renders simple threshold-based intervention schemes inefficient. Monitoring of actual prostate motion would allow the documentation of the dosimetric impact and implementation of corrective action if needed. However, when motion management techniques are evaluated, it should be kept in mind that the dosimetric impact of observed prostate motion is small for the majority of fractions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149229422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149229422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/0031-9155/53/24/005

DO - 10.1088/0031-9155/53/24/005

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 7073

EP - 7086

JO - Physics in Medicine and Biology

JF - Physics in Medicine and Biology

SN - 0031-9155

IS - 24

ER -