Correlation of Level of Trauma Activation with Emergency Department Intervention

Michael C. Cooper, Geetanjali Srivastava

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background In-hospital trauma team activation criteria are formulated to identify severely injured patients requiring specialized multidisciplinary care. Efficacy of trauma activation (TA) criteria is commonly measured by emergency department (ED) disposition, injury severity score, and mortality. Necessity of critical ED interventions is another measure that has been proposed to evaluate the appropriateness of TA criteria. Methods Two-year retrospective cohort study of 1715 patients from our trauma registry at a Level 1 pediatric trauma center. We abstracted data on acute interventions, level and criterion of TA, ED disposition, and mortality. We report odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), positive predictive value, and frequency of acute interventions. Results Trauma activation was initiated for 947 (55%) of the 1715 patients. There were 426 ED interventions performed on 235 patients (14%); 67.8% were in level 1 activations; 17.6% in level 2, and 14.6% in level 3. Highest-level activations were highly associated with need for ED interventions (OR, 16.1; 95% CI, 11.5-22.4). The ORs for requiring an ED intervention were low for lower level activations (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.3-0.5), trauma service consults (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.4), and certain mechanism-based criteria. The ORs for ED intervention for isolated motor vehicle collision (0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.7), isolated all-terrain vehicle rollover (0.4; 95% CI, 0.1-1.7), and suspected spinal cord injury (0.5; 95% CI, 0.1-3.7) were significantly lower than 1. Conclusions Highest-level activation criteria correlate with high utilization of ED resources and interventions. Lower level activation criteria and trauma service consult criteria are not highly correlated with need for ED interventions. Downgrading isolated motor vehicle collision and all-terrain vehicle rollovers and suspected spinal cord injury to lower level activations could decrease the overtriage rate, and adding age-specific bradycardia as a physiologic criterion could improve our undertriage rate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)369-375
Number of pages7
JournalPediatric Emergency Care
Volume34
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Wounds and Injuries
Confidence Intervals
Off-Road Motor Vehicles
Odds Ratio
Motor Vehicles
Spinal Cord Injuries
Injury Severity Score
Mortality
Trauma Centers
Bradycardia
Registries
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Pediatrics

Keywords

  • pediatric trauma
  • Trauma
  • trauma activation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Correlation of Level of Trauma Activation with Emergency Department Intervention. / Cooper, Michael C.; Srivastava, Geetanjali.

In: Pediatric Emergency Care, Vol. 34, No. 6, 01.06.2018, p. 369-375.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{556947b3d416428b9be7faf8d28bc351,
title = "Correlation of Level of Trauma Activation with Emergency Department Intervention",
abstract = "Background In-hospital trauma team activation criteria are formulated to identify severely injured patients requiring specialized multidisciplinary care. Efficacy of trauma activation (TA) criteria is commonly measured by emergency department (ED) disposition, injury severity score, and mortality. Necessity of critical ED interventions is another measure that has been proposed to evaluate the appropriateness of TA criteria. Methods Two-year retrospective cohort study of 1715 patients from our trauma registry at a Level 1 pediatric trauma center. We abstracted data on acute interventions, level and criterion of TA, ED disposition, and mortality. We report odds ratio (OR) with 95{\%} confidence intervals (CIs), positive predictive value, and frequency of acute interventions. Results Trauma activation was initiated for 947 (55{\%}) of the 1715 patients. There were 426 ED interventions performed on 235 patients (14{\%}); 67.8{\%} were in level 1 activations; 17.6{\%} in level 2, and 14.6{\%} in level 3. Highest-level activations were highly associated with need for ED interventions (OR, 16.1; 95{\%} CI, 11.5-22.4). The ORs for requiring an ED intervention were low for lower level activations (OR, 0.4; 95{\%} CI, 0.3-0.5), trauma service consults (OR, 0.3; 95{\%} CI, 0.2-0.4), and certain mechanism-based criteria. The ORs for ED intervention for isolated motor vehicle collision (0.2; 95{\%} CI, 0.1-0.7), isolated all-terrain vehicle rollover (0.4; 95{\%} CI, 0.1-1.7), and suspected spinal cord injury (0.5; 95{\%} CI, 0.1-3.7) were significantly lower than 1. Conclusions Highest-level activation criteria correlate with high utilization of ED resources and interventions. Lower level activation criteria and trauma service consult criteria are not highly correlated with need for ED interventions. Downgrading isolated motor vehicle collision and all-terrain vehicle rollovers and suspected spinal cord injury to lower level activations could decrease the overtriage rate, and adding age-specific bradycardia as a physiologic criterion could improve our undertriage rate.",
keywords = "pediatric trauma, Trauma, trauma activation",
author = "Cooper, {Michael C.} and Geetanjali Srivastava",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PEC.0000000000001509",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "369--375",
journal = "Pediatric Emergency Care",
issn = "0749-5161",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correlation of Level of Trauma Activation with Emergency Department Intervention

AU - Cooper, Michael C.

AU - Srivastava, Geetanjali

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Background In-hospital trauma team activation criteria are formulated to identify severely injured patients requiring specialized multidisciplinary care. Efficacy of trauma activation (TA) criteria is commonly measured by emergency department (ED) disposition, injury severity score, and mortality. Necessity of critical ED interventions is another measure that has been proposed to evaluate the appropriateness of TA criteria. Methods Two-year retrospective cohort study of 1715 patients from our trauma registry at a Level 1 pediatric trauma center. We abstracted data on acute interventions, level and criterion of TA, ED disposition, and mortality. We report odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), positive predictive value, and frequency of acute interventions. Results Trauma activation was initiated for 947 (55%) of the 1715 patients. There were 426 ED interventions performed on 235 patients (14%); 67.8% were in level 1 activations; 17.6% in level 2, and 14.6% in level 3. Highest-level activations were highly associated with need for ED interventions (OR, 16.1; 95% CI, 11.5-22.4). The ORs for requiring an ED intervention were low for lower level activations (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.3-0.5), trauma service consults (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.4), and certain mechanism-based criteria. The ORs for ED intervention for isolated motor vehicle collision (0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.7), isolated all-terrain vehicle rollover (0.4; 95% CI, 0.1-1.7), and suspected spinal cord injury (0.5; 95% CI, 0.1-3.7) were significantly lower than 1. Conclusions Highest-level activation criteria correlate with high utilization of ED resources and interventions. Lower level activation criteria and trauma service consult criteria are not highly correlated with need for ED interventions. Downgrading isolated motor vehicle collision and all-terrain vehicle rollovers and suspected spinal cord injury to lower level activations could decrease the overtriage rate, and adding age-specific bradycardia as a physiologic criterion could improve our undertriage rate.

AB - Background In-hospital trauma team activation criteria are formulated to identify severely injured patients requiring specialized multidisciplinary care. Efficacy of trauma activation (TA) criteria is commonly measured by emergency department (ED) disposition, injury severity score, and mortality. Necessity of critical ED interventions is another measure that has been proposed to evaluate the appropriateness of TA criteria. Methods Two-year retrospective cohort study of 1715 patients from our trauma registry at a Level 1 pediatric trauma center. We abstracted data on acute interventions, level and criterion of TA, ED disposition, and mortality. We report odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), positive predictive value, and frequency of acute interventions. Results Trauma activation was initiated for 947 (55%) of the 1715 patients. There were 426 ED interventions performed on 235 patients (14%); 67.8% were in level 1 activations; 17.6% in level 2, and 14.6% in level 3. Highest-level activations were highly associated with need for ED interventions (OR, 16.1; 95% CI, 11.5-22.4). The ORs for requiring an ED intervention were low for lower level activations (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.3-0.5), trauma service consults (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.4), and certain mechanism-based criteria. The ORs for ED intervention for isolated motor vehicle collision (0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.7), isolated all-terrain vehicle rollover (0.4; 95% CI, 0.1-1.7), and suspected spinal cord injury (0.5; 95% CI, 0.1-3.7) were significantly lower than 1. Conclusions Highest-level activation criteria correlate with high utilization of ED resources and interventions. Lower level activation criteria and trauma service consult criteria are not highly correlated with need for ED interventions. Downgrading isolated motor vehicle collision and all-terrain vehicle rollovers and suspected spinal cord injury to lower level activations could decrease the overtriage rate, and adding age-specific bradycardia as a physiologic criterion could improve our undertriage rate.

KW - pediatric trauma

KW - Trauma

KW - trauma activation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048734415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048734415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001509

DO - 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001509

M3 - Article

C2 - 29762335

AN - SCOPUS:85048734415

VL - 34

SP - 369

EP - 375

JO - Pediatric Emergency Care

JF - Pediatric Emergency Care

SN - 0749-5161

IS - 6

ER -