Cost-effectiveness of cinacalcet hydrochloride for hemodialysis patients with severe secondary hyperparathyroidism in Japan

Hirotaka Komaba, Kensuke Moriwaki, Shunsuke Goto, Shunsuke Yamada, Masatomo Taniguchi, Takatoshi Kakuta, Isao Kamae, Masafumi Fukagawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Cinacalcet effectively reduces elevated levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), even those with severe disease for whom parathyroidectomy can be the treatment of choice. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of cinacalcet treatment in hemodialysis patients with severe SHPT in Japan. Study Design: Cost-effectiveness analysis. Setting & Population: Patients with severe SHPT (intact PTH >500 pg/mL) who were receiving hemodialysis in Japan. Model, Perspective, & Timeframe: A Markov model was constructed from the health care system perspective in Japan. Patients were followed up over their lifetime. Dialysis costs were not included in the base case. Intervention: Cinacalcet as an addition to conventional treatment compared to conventional treatment alone. In both arms, patients underwent parathyroidectomy if intact PTH level was >500 pg/mL for 6 months and they were eligible for surgery. Outcomes: Costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Results: ICERs for cinacalcet for those who were eligible for surgery and those who were not were $352,631/QALY gained and $21,613/QALY gained, respectively. Sensitivity and scenario analyses showed that results were fairly robust to variations in model parameters and assumptions. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, cinacalcet was cost-effective in only 0.9% of simulations for those eligible for surgery, but in more than 99.9% of simulations for those ineligible for surgery, if society would be willing to pay $50,000 per additional QALY. Limitations: Data for the long-term effect of cinacalcet on patient-level outcomes are limited. The model predicted rates for clinical events using data for the surrogate biochemical end points. Conclusions: The use of cinacalcet to treat severe SHPT is likely to be cost-effective for only those who cannot undergo parathyroid surgery for medical or personal reasons.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)262-271
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2012

Keywords

  • Cinacalcet hydrochloride
  • cost-effectiveness
  • hemodialysis
  • secondary hyperparathyroidism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-effectiveness of cinacalcet hydrochloride for hemodialysis patients with severe secondary hyperparathyroidism in Japan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this