Craniofacial Flash: Minimizing Radiation Dose in Pediatric Craniofacial Computed Tomography

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

RESULTS: The conventional CT group included 175 patients (mean age 6.38 years) with a median dose length product of 243.00 mGy·cm. The Craniofacial-Flash CT group included 208 patients (mean age 3.31 years) with median dose length product of 27.60 mGy·cm. Image quality was equivalent for bone, with coefficient of variation values of 0.20 for the conventional CT group and 0.21 for the Craniofacial-Flash group. Soft tissues coefficients of variation were disparate at 0.07 for conventional CT and 0.14 for Craniofacial-Flash protocol.

CONCLUSION: The Craniofacial-Flash protocol reliably generates craniofacial bone images adequate for routine use in craniofacial practice, while reducing the radiation dose by 88.87% compared with a conventional craniofacial CT scan, and eliminating the need for sedation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The routine use of computed tomography (CT) in evaluation of pediatric craniofacial abnormalities is controversial. While there are benefits to preoperative imaging, there are risks related to ionizing radiation and sedation/anesthesia. In this study, the authors describe their experience with a new craniofacial CT protocol (Craniofacial-Flash) that provides bone detail equivalent to conventional CT, while delivering a substantially lower radiation dose and reducing the scan time to obviate the requirement of sedation/anesthesia.

METHODS: Following IRB approval, dose identification and image analysis were conducted retrospectively on all patients who underwent craniofacial CT using either the conventional protocol or Craniofacial-Flash protocol between November 2013 and September 2015. Image analysis consisted of automated segmentation of bone and soft tissue, followed by noise interpretation of each study segment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1751-1754
Number of pages4
JournalThe Journal of craniofacial surgery
Volume29
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Tomography
Radiation
Pediatrics
Bone and Bones
Anesthesia
Craniofacial Abnormalities
Research Ethics Committees
Ionizing Radiation
Noise

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

@article{ad94828273b945d39f237e93200d80da,
title = "Craniofacial Flash: Minimizing Radiation Dose in Pediatric Craniofacial Computed Tomography",
abstract = "RESULTS: The conventional CT group included 175 patients (mean age 6.38 years) with a median dose length product of 243.00 mGy·cm. The Craniofacial-Flash CT group included 208 patients (mean age 3.31 years) with median dose length product of 27.60 mGy·cm. Image quality was equivalent for bone, with coefficient of variation values of 0.20 for the conventional CT group and 0.21 for the Craniofacial-Flash group. Soft tissues coefficients of variation were disparate at 0.07 for conventional CT and 0.14 for Craniofacial-Flash protocol.CONCLUSION: The Craniofacial-Flash protocol reliably generates craniofacial bone images adequate for routine use in craniofacial practice, while reducing the radiation dose by 88.87{\%} compared with a conventional craniofacial CT scan, and eliminating the need for sedation.BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The routine use of computed tomography (CT) in evaluation of pediatric craniofacial abnormalities is controversial. While there are benefits to preoperative imaging, there are risks related to ionizing radiation and sedation/anesthesia. In this study, the authors describe their experience with a new craniofacial CT protocol (Craniofacial-Flash) that provides bone detail equivalent to conventional CT, while delivering a substantially lower radiation dose and reducing the scan time to obviate the requirement of sedation/anesthesia.METHODS: Following IRB approval, dose identification and image analysis were conducted retrospectively on all patients who underwent craniofacial CT using either the conventional protocol or Craniofacial-Flash protocol between November 2013 and September 2015. Image analysis consisted of automated segmentation of bone and soft tissue, followed by noise interpretation of each study segment.",
author = "Stewart, {Neil M.} and Hallac, {Rami R.} and Chou, {Pang Yun} and Korgun Koral and Tim Blackburn and Kane, {Alex A.} and Seaward, {James R.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SCS.0000000000004755",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "1751--1754",
journal = "Journal of Craniofacial Surgery",
issn = "1049-2275",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Craniofacial Flash

T2 - Minimizing Radiation Dose in Pediatric Craniofacial Computed Tomography

AU - Stewart, Neil M.

AU - Hallac, Rami R.

AU - Chou, Pang Yun

AU - Koral, Korgun

AU - Blackburn, Tim

AU - Kane, Alex A.

AU - Seaward, James R.

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - RESULTS: The conventional CT group included 175 patients (mean age 6.38 years) with a median dose length product of 243.00 mGy·cm. The Craniofacial-Flash CT group included 208 patients (mean age 3.31 years) with median dose length product of 27.60 mGy·cm. Image quality was equivalent for bone, with coefficient of variation values of 0.20 for the conventional CT group and 0.21 for the Craniofacial-Flash group. Soft tissues coefficients of variation were disparate at 0.07 for conventional CT and 0.14 for Craniofacial-Flash protocol.CONCLUSION: The Craniofacial-Flash protocol reliably generates craniofacial bone images adequate for routine use in craniofacial practice, while reducing the radiation dose by 88.87% compared with a conventional craniofacial CT scan, and eliminating the need for sedation.BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The routine use of computed tomography (CT) in evaluation of pediatric craniofacial abnormalities is controversial. While there are benefits to preoperative imaging, there are risks related to ionizing radiation and sedation/anesthesia. In this study, the authors describe their experience with a new craniofacial CT protocol (Craniofacial-Flash) that provides bone detail equivalent to conventional CT, while delivering a substantially lower radiation dose and reducing the scan time to obviate the requirement of sedation/anesthesia.METHODS: Following IRB approval, dose identification and image analysis were conducted retrospectively on all patients who underwent craniofacial CT using either the conventional protocol or Craniofacial-Flash protocol between November 2013 and September 2015. Image analysis consisted of automated segmentation of bone and soft tissue, followed by noise interpretation of each study segment.

AB - RESULTS: The conventional CT group included 175 patients (mean age 6.38 years) with a median dose length product of 243.00 mGy·cm. The Craniofacial-Flash CT group included 208 patients (mean age 3.31 years) with median dose length product of 27.60 mGy·cm. Image quality was equivalent for bone, with coefficient of variation values of 0.20 for the conventional CT group and 0.21 for the Craniofacial-Flash group. Soft tissues coefficients of variation were disparate at 0.07 for conventional CT and 0.14 for Craniofacial-Flash protocol.CONCLUSION: The Craniofacial-Flash protocol reliably generates craniofacial bone images adequate for routine use in craniofacial practice, while reducing the radiation dose by 88.87% compared with a conventional craniofacial CT scan, and eliminating the need for sedation.BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The routine use of computed tomography (CT) in evaluation of pediatric craniofacial abnormalities is controversial. While there are benefits to preoperative imaging, there are risks related to ionizing radiation and sedation/anesthesia. In this study, the authors describe their experience with a new craniofacial CT protocol (Craniofacial-Flash) that provides bone detail equivalent to conventional CT, while delivering a substantially lower radiation dose and reducing the scan time to obviate the requirement of sedation/anesthesia.METHODS: Following IRB approval, dose identification and image analysis were conducted retrospectively on all patients who underwent craniofacial CT using either the conventional protocol or Craniofacial-Flash protocol between November 2013 and September 2015. Image analysis consisted of automated segmentation of bone and soft tissue, followed by noise interpretation of each study segment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054437688&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054437688&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004755

DO - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004755

M3 - Article

C2 - 30095568

AN - SCOPUS:85054437688

VL - 29

SP - 1751

EP - 1754

JO - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

JF - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

SN - 1049-2275

IS - 7

ER -